William A Bower

Dr. William A Bower

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 December 2015 in MMWR. Recommendations and Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PBPrepared By
Prepared By
WBWilliam A Bower
William A Bower
KHKatherine Hendricks
Katherine Hendricks
SPSatish Pillai
Satish Pillai
JGJulie Guarnizo
Julie Guarnizo
DMDana Meaney-Delman
Dana Meaney-Delman
In 2014, CDC published updated guidelines for the prevention and treatment of anthrax (Hendricks KA, Wright ME, Shadomy SV, et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention expert panel meetings on prevention and treatment of anthrax in adults. Emerg Infect Dis 2014;20[2]. Available at http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/20/2/13-0687_article.htm). These guidelines provided recommended best practices for the diagnosis and treatment of persons with naturally occurring or bioterrorism-related anthrax in conventional medical settings. An aerosolized release of Bacillus anthracis spores over densely populated areas could become a mass-casualty incident. To prepare for this possibility, the U.S. government has stockpiled equipment and therapeutics (known as medical countermeasures [MCMs]) for anthrax prevention and treatment. However, previously developed, publicly available clinical recommendations have not addressed the use of MCMs or clinical management during an anthrax mass-casualty incident, when the number of patients is likely to exceed the ability of the health care infrastructure to provide conventional standards of care and supplies of MCMs might be inadequate to meet the demand required. To address this gap, in 2013, CDC conducted a series of systematic reviews of the scientific literature on anthrax to identify evidence that could help clinicians and public health authorities set guidelines for intravenous antimicrobial and antitoxin use, diagnosis of anthrax meningitis, and management of common anthrax-specific complications in the setting of a mass-casualty incident. Evidence from these reviews was presented to professionals with expertise in anthrax, critical care, and disaster medicine during a series of workgroup meetings that were held from August 2013 through March 2014. In March 2014, a meeting was held at which 102 subject matter experts discussed the evidence and adapted the existing best practices guidance to a clinical use framework for the judicious, efficient, and rational use of stockpiled MCMs for the treatment of anthrax during a mass-casualty incident, which is described in this report. This report addresses elements of hospital-based acute care, specifically antitoxins and intravenous antimicrobial use, and the diagnosis and management of common anthrax-specific complications during a mass-casualty incident. The recommendations in this report should be implemented only after predefined triggers have been met for shifting from conventional to contingency or crisis standards of care, such as when the magnitude of cases might lead to impending shortages of intravenous antimicrobials, antitoxins, critical care resources (e.g., chest tubes and chest drainage systems), or diagnostic capability. This guidance does not address primary triage decisions, anthrax postexposure prophylaxis, hospital bed or workforce surge capacity, or the logistics of dispensing MCMs. Clinicians, hospital administrators, state and local health officials, and planners can use these recommendations to assist in the development of crisis protocols that will ensure national preparedness for an anthrax mass-casualty incident.

1 February 2014 in Emerging Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KHKatherine A. Hendricks
Katherine A. Hendricks
MWMary E. Wright
Mary E. Wright
SSSean V. Shadomy
Sean V. Shadomy
JBJohn S. Bradley
John S. Bradley
MMMeredith G. Morrow
Meredith G. Morrow
TGThe Workgroup On Anthrax Clinical Guidelines
The Workgroup On Anthrax Clinical Guidelines
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention convened panels of anthrax experts to review and update guidelines for anthrax postexposure prophylaxis and treatment. The panels included civilian and military anthrax experts and clinicians with experience treating anthrax patients. Specialties represented included internal medicine, pediatrics, obstetrics, infectious disease, emergency medicine, critical care, pulmonology, hematology, and nephrology. Panelists discussed recent patients with systemic anthrax; reviews of published, unpublished, and proprietary data regarding antimicrobial drugs and anthrax antitoxins; and critical care measures of potential benefit to patients with anthrax. This article updates antimicrobial postexposure prophylaxis and antimicrobial and antitoxin treatment options and describes potentially beneficial critical care measures for persons with anthrax, including clinical procedures for infected nonpregnant adults. Changes from previous guidelines include an expanded discussion of critical care and clinical procedures and additional antimicrobial choices, including preferred antimicrobial drug treatment for possible anthrax meningitis.

1 July 2000 in The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WBWilliam A Bower
William A Bower
ONOmana V. Nainan
Omana V. Nainan
XHXiaohua Han
Xiaohua Han
HMHarold S. Margolis
Harold S. Margolis
The duration of viremia and time course for development of IgM antibodies were determined prospectively in natural and experimental hepatitis A virus

13 December 2019 in MMWR. Recommendations and Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WBWilliam A Bower
William A Bower
JSJarad Schiffer
Jarad Schiffer
RARobert L. Atmar
Robert L. Atmar
WKWendy A. Keitel
Wendy A. Keitel
AFArthur M. Friedlander
Arthur M. Friedlander
KHKatherine Hendricks
Katherine Hendricks
This report provides anthrax vaccine recommendations for the United States.

17 November 2023 in MMWR. Recommendations and Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
WBWilliam A Bower
William A Bower
YYYon Yu
Yon Yu
MPMarissa K. Person
Marissa K. Person
CPCorinne M. Parker
Corinne M. Parker
JKJordan L. Kennedy
Jordan L. Kennedy
KHKatherine A. Hendricks
Katherine A. Hendricks
This report describes updated guidelines and recommendations for prevention and treatment of anthrax.

16 June 2022 in Pathogens
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WBWilliam A Bower
William A Bower
KHKatherine A. Hendricks
Katherine A. Hendricks
AVAntonio R. Vieira
Antonio R. Vieira
RTRita Mae Traxler
Rita Mae Traxler
ZWZachary Patrick Weiner
Zachary Patrick Weiner
AHAlex R. Hoffmaster
Alex R. Hoffmaster
Anthrax has been feared for its high mortality in animals and humans for centuries. The etiologic agent is considered a potentially devastating bioweapon, and since 1876―when Robert Koch demonstrated that Bacillus anthracis caused anthrax―it has been considered the sole cause of the disease. Anthrax is, however, a toxin-mediated disease. The toxins edema toxin and lethal toxin are formed from protein components encoded for by the pXO1 virulence plasmid present in pathogenic B. anthracis strains. However, other members of the Bacillus cereus group, to which B. anthracis belongs, have recently been shown to harbor the pXO1 plasmid and produce anthrax toxins. Infection with these Bacillus cereus group organisms produces a disease clinically similar to anthrax. This suggests that anthrax should be defined by the exotoxins encoded for by the pXO1 plasmid rather than the bacterial species it has historically been associated with, and that the definition of anthrax should be expanded to include disease caused by any member of the B. cereus group containing the toxin-producing pXO1 plasmid or anthrax toxin genes specifically.