Asbestos is a class 1 carcinogen, and it has become clear that it harms the human body. Its use has been banned in many countries, and now the investigation and removal of installed asbestos has become a very important social issue. Accordingly, many social costs are expected to occur, and an efficient asbestos investigation method is required. So far, the examination of asbestos slates was performed through visual inspection. With recent advances in deep learning technology, it is possible to distinguish objects by discovering patterns in numerous training data. In this study, we propose the use of drone images and a faster region-based convolutional neural network (Faster R-CNN) to identify asbestos slates in target sites. Furthermore, the locations of detected asbestos slates were estimated using orthoimages and compiled cadastral maps. A total of 91 asbestos slates were detected in the target sites, and 91 locations were estimated from a total of 45 addresses. To verify the estimated locations, an on-site survey was conducted, and the location estimation method obtained an accuracy of 98.9%. The study findings indicate that the proposed method could be a useful research method for identifying asbestos slate roofs.

Active research on crack detection technology for structures based on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) has attracted considerable attention. Most of the existing research on localization of cracks using UAVs mounted the Global Positioning System (GPS)/Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) on the UAVs to obtain location information. When such absolute position information is used, several studies confirmed that positioning errors of the UAVs were reflected and were in the order of a few meters. To address these limitations, in this study, without using the absolute position information, localization of cracks was defined using relative position between objects in UAV-captured images to significantly reduce the error level. Through aerial photography, a total of 97 images were acquired. Using the point cloud technique, image stitching, and homography matrix algorithm, 5 cracks and 3 reference objects were defined. Importantly, the comparative analysis of estimated relative position values and ground truth values through field measurement revealed that errors in the range 24–84 mm and 8–48 mm were obtained on the x- and y-directions, respectively. Also, RMSE errors of 37.95–91.24 mm were confirmed. In the future, the proposed methodology can be utilized for supplementing and improving the conventional methods for visual inspection of infrastructures and facilities.

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have been employed to perform aerial surveys in many industries owing to their versatility, relatively low cost, and efficiency. Ground control points (GCPs) are used for georeferencing to ensure orthophoto geolocation/positioning accuracy. In this study, we investigate the impact of the number and distribution of GCPs on the accuracy of orthophoto production based on images acquired by UAVs. A test site was selected based on regulatory requirements, and several scenarios were developed considering the specifications of the UAVs used in this study. The locations of GCPs were varied to obtain the results. Based on the results obtained for different numbers of GCPs per unit area and distribution of GCPs, it is shown that UAV-based platforms can be more extensively utilized in a range of applications. The findings of this study will significantly impact the development process of GCP automation algorithms and enable a more cost-effective approach when determining target sites for UAV-based orthophoto production.

The detection of asbestos roof slate by drone is necessary to avoid the safety risks and costs associated with visual inspection. Moreover, the use of deep-learning models increases the speed as well as reduces the cost of analyzing the images provided by the drone. In this study, we developed a comprehensive learning model using supervised and unsupervised classification techniques for the accurate classification of roof slate. We ensured the accuracy of our model using a low altitude of 100 m, which led to a ground sampling distance of 3 cm/pixel. Furthermore, we ensured that the model was comprehensive by including images captured under a variety of light and meteorological conditions and from a variety of angles. After applying the two classification methods to develop the learning dataset and employing the as-developed model for classification, 12 images were misclassified out of 475. Visual inspection and an adjustment of the classification system were performed, and the model was updated to precisely classify all 475 images. These results show that supervised and unsupervised classification can be used together to improve the accuracy of a deep-learning model for the detection of asbestos roof slate.

This study aimed to identify the factors that can be used to evaluate the performance standards of fire-fighting drones employed in various fire-fighting missions. For this purpose, several common and uncommon performance factors were obtained by analyzing prior data from domestic and foreign research, analyses, and evaluations and three rounds of Delphi surveys were conducted. Through the consensus of a panel of experts, a total of 32 fire drone performance evaluations were classified into four evaluation categories: airframe (basic performance), battery, Ground Control System and controller, and mission equipment. This study identifies metrics for assessing the performance of fire-fighting drones and provides recommendations for their evaluation. The outcome of this study is expected to significantly contribute in future to the development of drone performance evaluation manuals with established criteria and methods for each item.