The decongestion ability in response to diuretic treatment plays a crucial role in the treatment of acute heart failure. This effectiveness is evaluated through the assessment of sodium concentration and urine volume, which are also treatment goals themselves. However, the bidirectional interconnection between these factors remains not fully understood. The objective of this study is to provide mechanistic insights into the correlation between spot urine sodium concentrations (UNa+) and urine dilution. This aims to better understand of the decongestive abilities in acute heart failure (AHF). The study was single-center, prospective, conducted on a group of 50 AHF patients. Each participant received a standardized furosemide dose of 1 mg per kg of body weight. Hourly diuresis was measured in the first 6 h of the study, and urine composition was assessed at predefined timepoints. The study group presented the exponential (rather than linear) pattern of relationship between UNa+ and 6-h urine volume, whereas relationship between eGFR and 6-h urine volume was linear (r = 0.61, p < 0.001). The relationship between UNa+ and all other analyzed indices of urine dilution, including the change from baseline in urine creatinine concentration, urine osmolarity, and urine osmolarity corrected for urine sodium, also exhibited an exponential relationship. Patients who were chronically exposed to furosemide demonstrated a significantly lower urine dilution (1.78 [1.18–3.54] vs 11.58 [3.9–17.88]; p < 0.001) in comparison to naïve individuals. In conclusion, it should be noted that in AHF higher UNa+ is associated with disproportionally higher urine dilution, and patients naïve to furosemide have significantly greater ability to dilute urine when compare to chronic furosemide users.
Despite the progress of its management, COVID-19 maintains an ominous condition which constitutes a threat, especially for the susceptible population. The cardiac injury occurs in approximately 30% of COVID-19 infections and is associated with a worse prognosis. The clinical presentation of cardiac involvement can be COVID-19-related myocarditis. Our review aims to summarise current evidence about that complication. The research was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42022338397). We performed a systematic analysis using five different databases, including i.a. MEDLINE. Further, the backward snowballing technique was applied to identify additional papers. Inclusion criteria were: full-text articles in English presenting cases of COVID-19-related myocarditis diagnosed by the ESC criteria and patients over 18 years old. The myocarditis had to occur after the COVID-19 infection, not vaccination. Initially, 1588 papers were screened from the database search, and 1037 papers were revealed in the backward snowballing process. Eventually, 59 articles were included. Data about patients’ sex, age, ethnicity, COVID-19 confirmation technique and vaccination status, reported symptoms, physical condition, laboratory and radiological findings, applied treatment and patient outcome were investigated and summarised. COVID-19-related myocarditis is associated with the risk of sudden worsening of patients’ clinical status, thus, knowledge about its clinical presentation is essential for healthcare workers.
Aims: Sodium excretion is a well-defined marker used to assess diuretic response in acute heart failure (AHF). Despite a strong pathophysiological background, the role of urine chloride excretion has not been described and established yet. We aimed to evaluate chloride trajectory during intensive diuretic treatment in AHF patients and examine its potential role in predicting poor diuretic response. Methods: The study was conducted on 50 AHF patients. Participants were included within the first 36 h of hospitalization. They received furosemide dose adjusted for body weight (half in bolus, half in 2 h infusion). Post-diuretic hourly urine collection with biochemical analysis was performed. Results: In general, the concentrations of urine chloride (uCl−) and sodium (uNa+) at the baseline samples exhibited a comparable level (71 ± 39 vs. 70 ± 44 mmol/L, respectively; P = 0.99), but across all post-furosemide study timepoints, uCl− remained significantly higher than uNa+ since 1 to 6 h of the study. In this course, both ions (uCl− and uNa+) reached peak values in 2 h (114 ± 28 vs. 97 ± 34 mmol/L, respectively; P < 0.01). The pattern of uCl− dominance over uNa+ concentration was also observed in separate analyses of patients naïve to furosemide and those chronically exposed to furosemide. Regardless of these patterns, naïve to furosemide individuals excreted more ions (both uCl− and uNa+) than chronically exposed patients at all timepoints. Additionally, a strong, linear correlation between uCl− and uNa+ was observed in each post-furosemide timepoint (the strongest in 1 h r = 0.87; P < 0.001). Both interdependent ions concentration was almost parallel when analysed in chronic furosemide users and those naïve to furosemide separately [uCl− = 0.85 * uNa+ + 28.82, P < 0.001, R2 = 0.83 for chronic furosemide users, and uCl− = 0.72 * uNa+ + 41.55, P < 0.001, R2 = 0.65 for naïves to furosemide (linear regression model)]. Moreover, uCl− (with cutoff point: 72 mmol/L) was a satisfactory predictive factor for poor diuretic response (<100 mL/h in 6 h since the beginning of furosemide infusion) [odds ratio (OR) 95% confidence interval (CI): 39.0 (3.8–405.00)]. It presented those properties also after adjusting for urine creatinine [cutoff point: 0.296 mmol/mg—OR (95% CI): 81.0 (8.0–816.0)]. Conclusions: Urine chloride and sodium are highly interrelated during decongestion of AHF patients. The uCl− (cutoff 72 mmol/L) exhibits better prognostic abilities to identify poor diuretic response than uNa+.
Acute heart failure (AHF) is a life-threatening, heterogeneous disease requiring urgent diagnosis and treatment. The clinical severity and medical procedures differ according to a complex interplay between the deterioration cause, underlying cardiac substrate, and comorbidities. This study aimed to analyze the natural phenotypic heterogeneity of the AHF population and evaluate the possibilities offered by clustering (unsupervised machine-learning technique) in a medical data assessment. We evaluated data from 381 AHF patients. Sixty-three clinical and biochemical features were assessed at the admission of the patients and were included in the analysis after the preprocessing. The K-medoids algorithm was implemented to create the clusters, and optimization, based on the Davies-Bouldin index, was used. The clustering was performed while blinded to the outcome. The outcome associations were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional-hazards regressions. The algorithm distinguished six clusters that differed significantly in 58 variables concerning i.e., etiology, clinical status, comorbidities, laboratory parameters and lifestyle factors. The clusters differed in terms of the one-year mortality (p = 0.002). Using the clustering techniques, we extracted six phenotypes from AHF patients with distinct clinical characteristics and outcomes. Our results can be valuable for future trial constructions and customized treatment.
The perception of acute heart failure (AHF) as a single entity is increasingly outdated, as distinct patient profiles can be discerned. Key heart failure (HF) studies have previously highlighted the difference in both the course and prognosis of de novo AHF and acute decompensated chronic HF (ADHF). Accordingly, distinct AHF profiles with differing underlying pathophysiologies of disease progression can be shown. We compared a range of selected biomarkers in order to better describe the profile of de novo AHF and ADHF, including the inter alia—serum lactate, bilirubin, matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP-9), follistatin, intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), lipocalin and galectin-3. The study comprised 248 AHF patients (de novo = 104), who were followed up for one year. The biomarker data of the de novo AHF and ADHF profiles was then compared in order to link biomarkers to their prognosis. Our study demonstrated that, although there are similarities between each patient profile, key biomarker differences do exist—predominantly in terms of NTproBNP, serum lactate, bilirubin, ICAM-1, follistatin, ferritin and sTfR (soluble transferrin receptor). ADHF tended to have compromised organ function and higher risks of both one-year mortality and composite endpoint (one-year mortality or rehospitalization for heart failure) hazard ratios (HR) (95% CI): 3.4 (1.8–6.3) and 2.8 (1.6–4.6), respectively, both p < 0.0001. Among the biomarkers of interest: sTfR HR (95% CI): 1.4 (1.04–1.8), NGAL(log) (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin) HR (95% CI): 2.0 (1.3–3.1) and GDF-15(log) (growth/differentiation factor-15) HR (95% CI): 4.0 (1.2–13.0) significantly impacted the one-year survival, all p < 0.05.
Heart failure (HF) constitutes a significant clinical problem and is associated with a sizeable burden for the healthcare system. Numerous novel techniques, including device interventions, are investigated to improve clinical outcome. A review of the most notable currently studied devices targeting pathophysiological processes in HF was performed. Interventions regarding autonomic nervous system imbalance, i.e., baroreflex activation therapy; vagus, splanchnic and cardiopulmonary nerves modulation; respiratory disturbances, i.e., phrenic nerve stimulation and synchronized diaphragmatic therapy; decongestion management, i.e., the Reprieve system, transcatheter renal venous decongestion system, Doraya, preCardia, WhiteSwell and Aquapass, are presented. Each segment is divided into subsections: potential pathophysiological target, existing evidence and weaknesses or unexplained issues. Novel therapeutic devices represent great potential in HF therapy management; however, further evidence is necessary to fully evaluate their utility.