Cluster planting of shortleaf pine, along with various site preparation and release treatments, were tested to restore mixed shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.)–hardwood stands in areas where the shortleaf pine has diminished in recent years. Shortleaf pine–hardwood mixtures were once a common forest type throughout the Cumberland Mountains and Plateau physiographic regions of the southeastern United States. Knowledge of how to restore shortleaf pine–hardwood mixtures is limited throughout shortleaf pine’s large native range. The objectives of this study were to compare planted shortleaf pine and natural hardwood regeneration survival, growth, and composition following various site preparation and early release treatments. Cluster planting and partial timber harvesting were used to reintroduce shortleaf pine and create two-aged stands in the Cumberland Mountains of Tennessee, USA. Results indicated that shortleaf pine survival, basal diameter, and height growth did not differ following four growing seasons among treatments. Natural regeneration stem densities and heights within shortleaf pine clusters did not differ significantly by treatment. Natural regeneration stem densities differed by species group and height class across the site, while the treatment × species interaction term was also significant. At this early stage of stand development, the brown-and-burn treatment appears poised for greater shortleaf pine growth rates than the other treatments. The herbicide treatment had the fewest regenerating hardwoods per hectare and the most desirable hardwood species composition.

Global change has resulted in chronic shifts in fire regimes, increasing fire frequency in some regions and decreasing it in others. Predicting the response of ecosystems to changing fire frequencies is challenging because of the multi-decadal timescales over which fire effects emerge and the variability in environmental conditions, fire types, and plant composition across biomes. Here, we address these challenges using surveys of tree communities across 29 sites that experienced multi-decadal alterations in fire frequencies spanning ecosystems and environmental conditions. Relative to unburned plots, more frequently burned plots had lower tree basal area and stem densities that compounded over multiple decades: average fire frequencies reduced basal area by only 4% after 16 years but 57% after 64 years, relative to unburned plots. Fire frequency had the largest effects on basal area in savanna ecosystems and in sites with strong wet seasons. Analyses of tree functional-trait data across North American sites revealed that frequently burned plots had tree communities dominated by species with low biomass nitrogen and phosphorus content and with more efficient nitrogen acquisition through ectomycorrhizal symbioses (rising from 85% to nearly 100%). Our data elucidate the impact of long-term fire regimes on tree community structure and composition, with the magnitude of change depending on climate, vegetation type, and fire history. The effects of widespread changes in fire regimes underway today will manifest in decades to come and have long-term consequences for carbon storage and nutrient cycling.

Surveys of forestry professionals who actively manage, or advise upon the management of, forest lands were conducted to determine their opinions of the usefulness of a forest management decision support model. The surveys were aimed at evaluating attitudes and concerns about the eYield model, which was developed to assist in the examination of management options for eastern United States forests. The coronavirus issue that began in 2020 necessitated a virtual workshop environment to illustrate the potential usefulness of the eYield model. Pre- and post-workshop assessment surveys suggested that there was an interest by land managers in tools like eYield that are straightforward to use. The results suggested that the instructions associated with eYield were generally clearly presented, and the outcomes produced by eYield were generally representative of real-world conditions. The surveys also indicated that people represented by the sample frame were willing to consider new technology that may be used to address complex forest land management issues. Improvements suggested by survey participants may result in greater user interaction with Internet-based decision support systems that focus on the management of land.

Trees that grow in close proximity to other trees are subject to crown and branch abrasion, causing mechanical injury. The loss of branch tips and buds through abrasion can affect the architecture and growth of tree crowns. This research quantifies the impacts of crown abrasion between neighboring trees of several deciduous species and how crown abrasion may influence stand dynamics. Tree interactions were evaluated during the dormant and growing seasons to determine how wind-generated movement affects crowns under foliated and un-foliated conditions. Branch elongation was measured in tree crowns where growth was both inhibited and uninhibited by adjacent trees. Bud durability was evaluated by growing season for species with determinate and indeterminate shoot growth forms using a pendulum impact tester. Crown movement during wind events was assessed by using three-axial accelerometers in the outermost points of tree crowns. Accelerometers logged the movement of branches in the tree crown. By using both the crown sway acceleration and associated bud durability and mass data, the possible force necessary to break or abrade buds and branches was calculated at different wind speeds. Branch elongation was greater for most species on the exposed side of the crown that was not affected by adjacent trees. Preformed buds from the determinate growth form were determined to have greater durability than sustained growth or indeterminant buds. Acceleration from wind gusts increased more rapidly as wind speed intensified in the growing season when leaves were on the tree than in the dormant season. This research suggests that crown abrasion contributes to the development of mixed species stands by reducing crown size and growth therefore allowing slower-growing species with determinant growth to stratify above faster growing trees with indeterminant growth.

A crop tree management study targeting green ash ( Fraxinus pennsylvanica Marsh.) was established in a 16-year-old, naturally regenerated, mixed-species, bottomland hardwood stand in southwest Tennessee. The goal was to maintain or improve ascendance of green ash into the overstory of a developing stand that otherwise might not occur. Three treatments were examined: a complete crown-touching release; the same release treatment along with a one-time, fertilizer application; and a control. Initial diameters, heights and crown size parameters were measured in 1996 and 18 years later. The two release treatments did not differ significantly in diameter and height growth response, but statistically outperformed the control treatment. Similarly, crown class scores did not differ between the two release treatments, but were significantly improved from the control. Both release treatments displayed a greater percentage of crop trees successfully competing for upper canopy status compared to the control. Using initial tree diameter as a reflection of crown size and position of crop trees, diameters of 12.5 to 20 cm were more likely to be a component of the overstory 18 years following crop tree treatments. Crop trees less than 12.5 cm in diameter were likely to remain in the subordinate crown classes. Trees greater than 20 cm in diameter were already in the overstory and maintained their upper canopy position. These results suggest that crop tree management can be an effective management tool for improving growth as well as improving overstory presence of green ash in pole-sized, mixed-species, bottomland hardwood stands.