The use of magnet compression to endoscopically create an esophageal anastomosis is an intriguing approach to esophageal atresia repair, but published cases with an existing available device have demonstrated mixed success. One major shortcoming has been the formation of subsequent severe, recalcitrant strictures after primary repair. To address the limitations of the existing device, we recently introduced and reported success with specially designed bi-radial magnets that exhibit a novel geometry and unique tissue compression profile. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes using our novel device (novel group, NG) with those of previous reports which utilized the historical device (historic group, HG) in a PRISMA-compliant systematic review. Seven studies were eligible for further analysis. Additionally, one of our previously unreported cases was included in the analysis. Esophageal pouch approximation prior to primary repair was performed more frequently in the NG than in the HG (100% NG vs. 21% HG; p = 0.003). There was no difference in the overall postoperative appearance of postoperative stricture (95% HG vs. 100% NG; p = 0.64). The number of postoperative dilatations trended lower in the NG (mean 4.25 NG vs. 9.5 HG; p = 0.051). In summary, magnetic compression anastomosis adds a new promising treatment option for patients with complex esophageal atresia. Prior approximation of pouches and a novel magnet design have the potential to lower the rate of stricture formation.

Background: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) repair can be challenging, particularly when a larger defect is present. Barbed sutures prevent the suture from slipping back after approximation of the tissues. Although introduced almost 2 decades ago, barbed sutures have not been widely used for CDH repair. We report our initial experience and pitfalls. Methods: All patients presenting with CDH from 2021 onward underwent repair using barbed sutures. Demographics, operative parameters, complications, and outcomes were prospectively recorded. Results: A total of 13 patients underwent CDH repair during the study interval (median age 6 days, range 3 days to 5.75 years). Median operative time was 89 min (range 46 to 288 min). Five thoracoscopic and eight open procedures were performed. Severe pulmonary hypertension and ECMO (extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) were considered contraindications for thoracoscopic repair. The included patients were compared to a historic controlled group performed without barbed sutures. The barbed suture facilitated easy and quick closure of the defects in most cases and obviated the need for knot tying. One patient in the thoracoscopic group had a patch placed due to high tension after the barbed sutures tore the diaphragm. At a median follow-up time of 15 months (range 2 to 34 months), one patient had died, and one patient with complete diaphragmatic agenesis was home-ventilated. There were no recurrences. Median operative time trended lower (89 min) than in the historic control group repaired without barbed sutures (119 min, p < 0.06) after eliminating outliers with large, complex patch repairs. Conclusions: Barbed sutures simplify congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair regardless of whether a minimal-invasive or open approach is performed. Patch repair is not a contraindication for using barbed sutures. The resulting potential time savings make them particularly useful in patients with cardiac or other severe co-morbidities in which shorter operative times are essential. In cases with high tension, though, the barbs may tear through and produce a “saw” effect on the tissue with subsequent damage.

Background: Anorectal malformations comprise a broad spectrum of disease. We developed a percutaneous anorectoplasty (PARP) technique as a minimal-invasive option for repair of amenable types of lesions. Methods: Patients who underwent PARP at five institutions from 2008 through 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic information, details of the operative procedure, and perioperative complications and outcomes were collected. Results: A total of 10 patients underwent the PARP procedure during the study interval. Patients either had low perineal malformations or no appreciable fistula. Most procedures were guided by ultrasound, fluoroscopy, or endoscopy. Median age at PARP was 3 days (range 1 to 311) days; eight patients were male. Only one intraoperative complication occurred, prompting conversion to posterior sagittal anorectoplasty. Functional outcomes in most children were highly satisfactory in terms of continence and functionality. Conclusions: The PARP technique is an excellent minimal-invasive alternative for boys born with perineal fistulae, as well as patients of both sexes without fistulae. The optimal type of guidance (ultrasound, fluoroscopy, or endoscopy) depends on the anatomy of the lesion and the presence of a colostomy at the time of repair.

Minimally invasive esophageal atresia (EA) repair is deemed one of the most demanding procedures in pediatric surgery. Open repair is considered the gold standard and learning opportunities for minimally invasive repairs remain scarce. “Telemedical Interdisciplinary Care for Patients with Esophageal Atresia (TIC-PEA)” offers free access to an interdisciplinary network of experts for telemedical consultation (telementoring). The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in TIC-PEA patients compared to the general population. TIC-PEA patients were matched and compared to controls regarding the use of MIS, patient characteristics, and complications. Patients (n = 31) were included at a mean age of 62.8 days (95%-CI: 41.4–84.3, 77% after the primary esophageal repair). The odds-ratio to have MIS was 4.03 (95%-confidence interval: 0.79–20.55) for esophageal anastomosis and 4.60 (95%-confidence interval: 0.87–24.22) for tracheoesophageal fistula-repair in the TIC-PEA group. Telementoring offered the chance to select the ideal candidate for MIS, plan the procedure, and review intraoperative images and videos with the expert. Telementoring as offered is ideal to promote MIS for EA and helps to address the individual learning curve. In order to maximize benefits, patients need to be included prior to the first esophageal procedure.

Recent studies show that at least three-quarters of surgeons who perform minimally invasive surgery suffer from musculoskeletal pain and discomfort. This problem may compromise surgical performance, patient outcomes, and career longevity. Because of small patient dimensions, pediatric surgery is associated with a different set of ergonomic challenges than adult surgery. A 59-item questionnaire was sent to all practicing pediatric surgeons in Germany. It contained a general assessment of demographics, practice setting, operative volume, types of operations performed, and compensatory interventions, followed by the validated Nordic Questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms (NMQ). Responses were collected and statistically evaluated to identify risk factors for musculoskeletal complications. A total of 152 pediatric surgeons participated in the survey. Among the participants, 21% were trainees, 58% attendings, and 21% chiefs of service. The median time in practice was 18 years (range: 0 to 38 years). Musculoskeletal pain was reported by 75%, and was most prevalent in the neck/cervical (80%), shoulder (56%), and lower back/lumbar region (71%). Footrests or steps were used by 88%, intraoperative breaks were employed by 49%, and 96% of respondents sometimes operated in a sitting position. The only significant factor for musculoskeletal pain was number of years in practice. Musculoskeletal pain among pediatric surgeons is common and increases with years in practice. Although many pediatric surgeons incorporate ergonomic measures in their daily activities, these are far from being implemented universally. More awareness and research on the prevention of long-term musculoskeletal sequelae in pediatric surgery is necessary.

Background: Esophageal magnetic compression anastomosis (EMCA) represents an innovative minimally invasive approach for establishing esophageal continuity for patients with esophageal atresia, especially when comorbidities increase the risk of a thoracoscopic or open operation. Over the last 5 years, we have demonstrated favorable outcomes in our patients, but have also encountered cases in which EMCA was not successful. This report is an in-depth analysis of the failed EMCA attempts. Methods: A retrospective chart review of all patients who were scheduled for EMCA was performed. All patients who failed magnet placement and underwent conventional repair instead were identified and presented as case series. Patient characteristics, intra- and postoperative data, reasons for failure, and follow-up data were analyzed. Results: From 2021 through 2024, EMCA was attempted in a total of 15 patients by our team on an intention-to-treat basis under compassionate care ethics. Placement of the magnets failed in 3 patients (20%). Every case showed specific characteristics that prohibited magnet coupling. In case 1, metal clips that had been placed during a prior lengthening procedure precluded mating of the magnets. In case 2, an atretic lower pouch was present and therefore the magnet could not be advanced toward the proximal end of the distal pouch. In the third case, an atypical bronchus was interposed between the two esophageal pouches, resulting in distance and tissue between the upper and lower pouch. Conclusion: EMCA is a minimally invasive approach for endoscopic esophageal anastomosis creation in complex cases of esophageal atresia, or patients with comorbidities that confer a very high surgical risk. Careful patient selection and preparation is crucial to maximize the chance of success. Based on our current experience and case series, we propose certain anatomic variants and pre-existing factors as contraindications for EMCA.