Nina Langkabel

Dr. Nina Langkabel

Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2015 in Poultry Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NLNina Langkabel
Nina Langkabel
MBMaximilian P. O. Baumann
Maximilian P. O. Baumann
AFAnnika Feiler
Annika Feiler
ASArsooth Sanguankiat
Arsooth Sanguankiat
RFReinhard Fries
Reinhard Fries
During the catching of broilers for slaughter, 2 to 3 birds are grabbed per hand at one leg at the same time. From an animal welfare point of view, this procedure is under critical observation from animal welfare administration and the general public.

23 August 2023 in Food Control
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AOAbbey Olsen
Abbey Olsen
SBSilvia Bonardi
Silvia Bonardi
LBLisa Barco
Lisa Barco
MSMarianne Sandberg
Marianne Sandberg
NLNina Langkabel
Nina Langkabel
EKEija Kaukonen
Eija Kaukonen

2 December 2022 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RIRudi Isbrandt
Rudi Isbrandt
MWMechthild Wiegard
Mechthild Wiegard
DMDiana Meemken
Diana Meemken
NLNina Langkabel
Nina Langkabel
Animal welfare is a high social and political priority and is enshrined in European and national legislation. This systematic literature review (funded by the German Ministry of Food and Agriculture; grant no. 2817806A18) was conducted to find animal and management-based indicators that could be influenced by changes in pig handling and management procedures on the day of slaughter and, therefore, will directly result in improved animal welfare. For this systematic literature review, following the PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a structured literature search using the databases PubMed®, Web of ScienceTM, and LIVIVO with set search terms and their combinations in German and English. Only peer-reviewed original articles from European countries from 2009 until 2022 that dealt with welfare during transport and/or slaughter of fattening pigs and offered potential measurable indicators on the basis of the animal or management, and either directly or indirectly recommended handling practices were included. We used the literature management system EndNoteTM, and after duplicate removal, a total of 1099 records were found for further analysis. After analysis and discussion in the review team, which consisted of three experts in total, 105 articles underwent full-text screening. Finally, 39 articles were included in the results for this systematic literature review. According to this systematic literature review, the following procedures have a positive impact on the animal welfare of pigs on the day of slaughter. Calm—rather than rough—handling of pigs was the most influential factor. This can be achieved by using animal-friendly driving aids. Loud noise should be avoided in general or reduced as far as possible. Transport time is not always influenceable, but shorter transport duration with stocking density as stated by the European regulations as a maximum will reduce stress in pigs. Our review showed that there are differing scientific results about lairage duration, although this should be set in relation to prior stress and transport time. Knowledge of good stunning parameters, such as gas concentration, exposure time to the gas, recommended amperage, and current flow duration is essential. If electrical stunning is performed, the correct attachment of electrodes is crucial. The control of stunning effectiveness is extremely important to avoid suffering and pain, with the proviso that it is assessed on the basis of multiple parameters. The corneal reflex, regular gasping, and the up-righting reflex could be assessed together. Certificates of competence and continuing educational programmes for the personnel form the basis of animal-friendly handling and a stressless slaughter routine. It can be assumed that the results of this systematic literature review reflect the state of current research of pig welfare during transport and slaughter in the European Union, even though it must be assumed that not all relevant points were covered by the review, which can be seen as a limitation at the same time because important non-European or older publications could not be included.

13 June 2023 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SNSvea Nicolaisen
Svea Nicolaisen
NLNina Langkabel
Nina Langkabel
CTChrista Thöne-Reineke
Christa Thöne-Reineke
MWMechthild Wiegard
Mechthild Wiegard
Literature related to European transport and slaughter processes were included in this systematic review. The publication period is limited to the past twelve years since the European Animal Welfare Transport Regulation was enacted in 2009. Three different databases were used. The final screening resulted in the inclusion of 19 articles in this review. When handling cattle during transport and slaughter, personnel have an important impact and may inflict stress on the animals. Other factors, such as the group composition and health status prior to transport, can have a strong negative effect on animal welfare. At the abattoir, constructional conditions and the resulting environmental influences can have a negative impact on welfare as well. These include increased noise levels due to the lack of noise dampening and changing light conditions. Stress in cattle can be assessed, e.g., by measuring stress hormones or heart rate. Effective stunning is an important welfare-relevant step in the slaughtering process. Some signs of unconsciousness, such as immediate body collapse or absence of the corneal reflex, can be easily assessed. Expertise and continuous training of all personnel involved are important measures in stress reduction.

14 June 2024 in Food Control
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JCJoão B Cota
João B Cota
NLNina Langkabel
Nina Langkabel
LBLisa Barco
Lisa Barco
AOAbbey Olsen
Abbey Olsen
SBSilvia Bonardi
Silvia Bonardi
EKEija Kaukonen
Eija Kaukonen

20 July 2022 in Research in Veterinary Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Madalena Vieira-PintoMadalena Vieira-Pinto
Madalena Vieira-Pinto
NLNina Langkabel
Nina Langkabel
SSSusana Santos
Susana Santos
LALis Alban
Lis Alban
Jaime Gómez LagunaJaime Gómez Laguna
Jaime Gómez Laguna
RLRiikka Laukkanen-Ninios
Riikka Laukkanen-Ninios
Meat inspection (MI) is essential to verify compliance with legal requirements related to human and animal health and animal welfare protections. Judgement criteria applied during MI, resulting in condemnation data of importance, among other things, for livestock producers and for benchmarking reasons. However, although the Meat Inspection Regulation sets out judgement criteria, most are generic, favouring flexibility, but also subjectivity. To address the degree of variation on total condemnation (TC) criteria applied during post-mortem inspection (PMI) of finishing pigs, an online survey was prepared aiming to collect this information from several European countries. The focus was on TC criteria regarding the following PMI findings: abscesses, arthritis, cachexia, erysipelas, icterus, Mycobacterium-like lesions, osteomyelitis, peritonitis, pleuritis and pneumonia. From September to November 2020, a total of 44 completed questionnaires were obtained from 26 European countries. The results showed a substantial variation in the TC criteria in place in the participating countries. One of the main reasons for the variability seen in the respondents' reported answers was related to the indicators used to define a generalised condition related to the 10 PMI findings addressed, making harmonisation a challenge and avoiding to draw conclusions when comparing condemnation causes between abattoirs. This implies that it would make sense to look into how a generalised condition can be identified/described and how it should be judged. The results should be used as inspiration towards possible harmonisation, improving decision-making, and permitting comparative analysis between different reports to allow trend analyses and benchmarking.