In mammals, type I IFNs (mainly IFN-α/β) are primarily regulated by transcription factors of the IFN regulatory factor (IRF) family. Fish IFNs do not show a one-to-one orthologous relationship with mammalian type I IFN homologues. Using a bacterial one-hybrid reporter screening system and an overexpression approach to explore the molecular mechanism underlying fish IFN induction, we identified zebrafish Danio rerio IRF (DrIRF)1 as a positive regulator of the fish IFN antiviral response. Among 12 zebrafish IRF family genes, DrIRF1 is most abundant in zebrafish immune tissues, including head kidney and spleen; upon virus infection, it is one of most significantly induced genes. Overexpression of DrIRF1 induces the expression of IFN and IFN-stimulated genes, hence protecting epithelioma papulosum cyprini cells against spring viremia of carp virus infection. As a transcription factor with constitutively nuclear retention, DrIRF1 directly binds to the IFN-stimulated regulatory element/IRF-binding element sites of zebrafish IFN promoters, which are dependent on four conserved amino acids of the N-terminal DNA-binding domain helix α3 motif. Mutation of either residue reveals a differential requirement for DrIRF1-mediated activation of zebrafish IFNϕ1 and IFNϕ3 promoters. Notably, C-terminal phosphorylation of DrIRF1 is observed and is not required for in vitro binding of DrIRF1 to fish IFN promoters. Unlike DrIRF3 and DrIRF7, which are responsible for differential expression of zebrafish IFNϕ1 and IFNϕ3 through the retinoic acid–inducible gene I–like receptor pathway, DrIRF1 works in concert with MyD88 to activate zebrafish IFNϕ3 but not IFNϕ1. These results provide insights into the evolving function of IRF1 as a positive IFN regulator.

In mammals, IFN regulatory factor (IRF)1, IRF3, and IRF7 are three critical transcription factors that are pivotal for cooperative regulation of the type I IFN response. In this study, we explored the relative contribution of zebrafish (Danio rerio) IRF1 (DrIRF1), IRF3 (DrIRF3), and IRF7 (DrIRF7) (DrIRF1/3/7) to zebrafish IFNΦ1 (DrIFNΦ1) and IFNΦ3 (DrIFNΦ3) (DrIFNΦ1/3) activation. Following spring viremia of carp virus infection, DrIFNΦ1/3 and DrIRF1/3/7 transcripts are significantly induced in zebrafish tissues, which correlates with the replication of spring viremia of carp virus. DrIRF1/3/7 selectively bind to the IRF-binding element/IFN-stimulated regulatory element sites of DrIFNΦ1/3 promoters, with the exception that DrIRF3 has no preference for two IRF-binding element/IFN-stimulated regulatory element motifs within the DrIFNΦ3 promoter. Consistently, DrIRF3 alone activates DrIFNΦ1, but not DrIFNΦ3; DrIRF7 predominantly stimulates DrIFNΦ3; and DrIRF1 has similar potential to DrIFNΦ1 and DrIFNΦ3. Strikingly, DrIRF3 facilitates the binding of DrIRF1 and DrIRF7 to both zebrafish IFN promoters, and so does DrIRF7 for the binding of DrIRF1, particularly to the DrIFNΦ3 promoter. These binding properties correlate with differential responses of DrIFNΦ1 and DrIFNΦ3 to the combinatory stimulation of DrIRF1/3/7, depending on their relative amounts. Similar to the dual roles of human IRF3 in regulating IRF7-activated IFNα genes, DrIRF3 exerts dual effects on DrIRF1-mediated DrIFNΦ3 gene expression: an inhibitory effect at lower concentrations and a synergistic effect at higher concentrations. These data provide evidence that fish and mammals have evolved a similar IRF-dependent regulatory mechanism fine-tuning IFN gene activation.

The double-stranded RNA (dsRNA)-dependent protein kinase (PKR) inhibits protein synthesis by phosphorylating eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2α (eIF2α). In fish species, in addition to PKR, there exists a PKR-like protein kinase containing Z-DNA binding domains (PKZ). However, the antiviral role of fish PKZ and the functional relationship between fish PKZ and PKR remain unknown. Here we confirmed the coexpression of fish PKZ and PKR proteins in Carassius auratus blastula embryonic (CAB) cells and identified them as two typical interferon (IFN)-inducible eIF2α kinases, both of which displayed an ability to inhibit virus replication. Strikingly, fish IFN or all kinds of IFN stimuli activated PKZ and PKR to phosphorylated eIF2α. Overexpression of both fish kinases together conferred much more significant inhibition of virus replication than overexpression of either protein, whereas morpholino knockdown of both made fish cells more vulnerable to virus infection than knockdown of either. The antiviral ability of fish PKZ was weaker than fish PKR, which correlated with its lower ability to phosphorylate eIF2α than PKR. Moreover, the independent association of fish PKZ or PKR reveals that each of them formed homodimers and that fish PKZ phosphorylated eIF2α independently on fish PKR and vice versa. These results suggest that fish PKZ and PKR play a nonredundant but cooperative role in IFN antiviral response.

In mammals, RIG-I like receptors (RLRs) RIG-I and melanoma differentiation–associated gene 5 (MDA5) sense cytosolic viral RNA, leading to IFN antiviral response; however, LGP2 exhibits controversial functions. The same happens to fish LGP2. In this study we report that three zebrafish LGP2 splicing transcripts, a full-length LGP2, and two truncating variants, LGP2v1 and LGP2v2, play distinct roles during IFN antiviral response. Overexpression of the full-length LGP2 not only potentiates IFN response through the RLR pathway, in the absence or presence of poly(I:C) at limited concentrations, but also inhibits IFN response by relative high concentrations of poly(I:C) through functional attenuation of signaling factors involved in the RLR pathway; however, LGP2v1 and LGP2v2 only retain the inhibitory role. Consistently, LGP2 but not LGP2v1 and LGP2v2 confers protection on fish cells against spring viremia of carp virus (SVCV) infection and at limited expression levels, LGP2 exerts more significant protection than either RIG-I or MDA5. Further data suggest that in the early phase of SVCV infection, LGP2 functions as a positive regulator but along with SVCV replicating in cells up to a certain titer, which leads to a far more robust expression of IFN, LGP2 switches to a negative role. These in vitro results suggest an ingenious mechanism where the three zebrafish LGP2 splicing transcripts work cooperatively to shape IFN antiviral responses.