Prior research has shown that for specific periods, vegetation indices from PlanetScope and Sentinel-2 (used as a reference) must be aligned to benefit from the experience of Sentinel-2 and utilize techniques such as data fusion. Even during the worst-case scenario, it is possible through histogram matching to calibrate PlanetScope indices to achieve the same values as Sentinel-2 (useful also for proxy). Based on these findings, the authors examined the effectiveness of linear regression in aligning individual bands prior to computing indices to determine if the bands are shifted differently. The research was conducted on five important bands: Red, Green, Blue, NIR, and RedEdge. These bands allow for the computation of well-known vegetation indices like NDVI and NDRE, and soil indices like Iron Oxide Ratio and Coloration Index. Previous research showed that linear regression is not sufficient by itself to align indices in the worst-case scenario. However, this paper demonstrates its efficiency in achieving accurate band alignment. This finding highlights the importance of considering specific scaling requirements for bands obtained from different satellite sensors, such as PlanetScope and Sentinel-2. Contemporary images acquired by the two sensors during May and July demonstrated different behaviors in their bands; however, linear regression can align the datasets even during the problematic month of May.

Rice farming in Italy accounts for about 50% of the EU’s rice area and production. Precision agriculture has entered the scene to enhance sustainability, cut pollution, and ensure food security. Various studies have used remote sensing tools like satellites and drones for multispectral imaging. While Sentinel-2 is highly regarded for precision agriculture, it falls short for specific applications, like at the “Riserva San Massimo” (Gropello Cairoli, Lombardia, Northern Italy) rice farm, where irregularly shaped crops need higher resolution and frequent revisits to deal with cloud cover. A prior study that compared Sentinel-2 and the higher-resolution PlanetScope constellation for vegetative indices found a seasonal miscalibration in the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and in the Normalized Difference Red Edge Index (NDRE). Dr. Agr. G.N. Rognoni, a seasoned agronomist working with this farm, stresses the importance of studying the radiometric intercalibration between the PlanetScope and Sentinel-2 vegetative indices to leverage the knowledge gained from Sentinel-2 for him to apply variable rate application (VRA). A high-resolution SkySat image, taken almost simultaneously with a pair of Sentinel-2 and PlanetScope images, offered a chance to examine if the irregular distribution of vegetation and barren land within rice fields might be a factor in the observed miscalibration. Using an unsupervised pixel-based image classification technique on SkySat imagery, it is feasible to split rice into two subclasses and intercalibrate them separately. The results indicated that combining histograms and agronomists’ expertise could confirm SkySat classification. Moreover, the uneven spatial distribution of rice does not affect the seasonal miscalibration object of past studies, which can be adjusted using the methods described here, even with images taken four days apart: the first method emphasizes accuracy using linear regression, histogram shifting, and histogram matching; whereas the second method is faster and utilizes only histogram matching.

This paper examines how to align PlanetScope and Sentinel-2 vegetation indices, focusing on the Normalized Difference Red Edge (NDRE) index, which is commonly used in precision agriculture for prescription maps. While Sentinel-2 is popular for crop monitoring, its low spatial resolution limits use in small or irregular fields. PlanetScope provides higher-resolution, more frequent imagery, but its sensor differs from the Sentinel-2, limiting compatibility with current research and tools. By testing three adjustment methods, the study shows that it is possible to align PlanetScope NDRE values with Sentinel-2: M1 (Linear Regression + Histogram Shifting + Histogram Matching), M2 (Histogram Matching), and M3 (per-band linear regression before index calculation). Two dates from 2022 were selected as representative seasonal extremes from the broader 2021–2023 dataset of 56 image pairs (Baldin, 2025), which was further analyzed through time-series methods. Resampling direction (PS→10 m, S2→3 m) minimally affects RMSE/MAE but significantly alters spatial structure and Moran’s I values; downscaling PS to 10 m decreases Moran’s I. M2 is suitable for standard applications, whereas M3 is preferable when preservation of spatial structure is important. Across the four examined scenarios, all methods reduce RMSE below the 0.07 agronomic threshold, with calibrated RMSE ranging from 0.02 to 0.05 (up to 0.06 across the full 56-pair dataset). M3’s advantage lies in how effectively it reduces spatial autocorrelation mismatch: a 43.4% reduction in Moran’s I (versus ~18.2% with M1 and M2) in the four example scenarios, and 39.5% versus 28.4% (M1) and 28.2% (M2) reduction over the full dataset.

Ground-level air temperature (Tair) is an essential variable for climate monitoring, agricultural management, and hazard prevention. Conventional ground-based measurements often fail to capture the fine-scale spatial variability, especially in regions with complex terrain. Land Surface Temperature (LST) remote sensing offers a complementary solution, providing spatially continuous and temporally frequent observations. This study evaluates the potential of MODIS and Landsat-8 LST products to estimate Tair in a heterogeneous agricultural landscape. We developed spatiotemporal regression models linking satellite-derived LST to ground observations from meteorological stations over the five years 2018–2022. MODIS data provided high temporal coverage through 8- day composites, while Landsat-8 offered higher spatial resolution LST via the Statistical Mono-Window algorithm. The models were validated using Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation, achieving high predictive accuracy for MODIS-based Tair estimation (R² = 0.981, RMSE = 1.1 °C), whereas Landsat-8 captured finer spatial variability (R² = 0.859, RMSE = 3.4 °C). Our results demonstrate that integrating multi-resolution LST products enables accurate, dense mapping of Tair, supporting operational forecasting for precision agriculture. The study also discusses limitations related to land-cover heterogeneity, temporal representativeness, and potential extensions using spatial correlation methods or radar-derived crop-structure information.