In recent years, several types of molecular markers and new microscale skeletal characters have shown potential as powerful tools for phylogenetic reconstructions and higher-level taxonomy of scleractinian corals. Nonetheless, discrimination of closely related taxa is still highly controversial in scleractinian coral research. Here we used newly sequenced complete mitochondrial genomes and 30 microsatellites to define the genetic divergence between two closely related azooxanthellate taxa of the family Caryophylliidae: solitary Desmophyllum dianthus and colonial Lophelia pertusa. In the mitochondrial control region, an astonishing 99.8 % of nucleotides between L. pertusa and D. dianthus were identical. Variability of the mitochondrial genomes of the two species is represented by only 12 non-synonymous out of 19 total nucleotide substitutions. Microsatellite sequence (37 loci) analysis of L. pertusa and D. dianthus showed genetic similarity is about 97 %. Our results also indicated that L. pertusa and D. dianthus show high skeletal plasticity in corallum shape and similarity in skeletal ontogeny, micromorphological (septal and wall granulations) and microstructural characters (arrangement of rapid accretion deposits, thickening deposits). Molecularly and morphologically, the solitary Desmophyllum and the dendroid Lophelia appear to be significantly more similar to each other than other unambiguous coral genera analysed to date. This consequently leads to ascribe both taxa under the generic name Desmophyllum (priority by date of publication). Findings of this study demonstrate that coloniality may not be a robust taxonomic character in scleractinian corals.

Phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary patterns in the genus Barbus were examined through the analysis of the complete sequences of three mitochondrial genes: ATPases 8 and 6, which overlap slightly, and cytochrome b. This complex genus includes diploid as well as tetraploid and hexaploid species that are distributed throughout the Palaearctic, Ethiopian and Asiatic biogeographical regions. Given that genome duplication is an important evolutionary mechanism in eukaryotes, in the present report we attempt to describe its role in the evolution of the genus Barbus, as well as drawing systematic and phylogenetic conclusions. The phylogenetic results indicated the splitting of the current Barbus genus into five main mitochondrial lineages corresponding to (i) the genus Barbus sensu stricto (tetraploid, which is subdivided into the subgenera Barbus and Luciobarbus), (ii) the hexaploid species, (iii) the Ethiopian tetraploid species, (iv) the African diploid species, and (v) the Asian diploid species. The branching of 'foreign' genera as sister groups of some of these monophyletic assemblages (such as Aulopyge is to Barbus sensu stricto or Varicorhinus is to the hexaploid barbels) demonstrates the polyphyly of the group. Moreover, the relationships between the proposed lineages also show that genome duplication may be considered as a homoplasic character since it must have occurred over at least three independent periods and/or in three independent areas. In relation to the possible saltational evolutionary model for the polyploid species examined here, it was found that, although feasible at the nuclear level, the mitochondrial markers looked at do not appear to have undergone this type of evolution. Rather, they seem to have experienced more or less constant change through time.