Alessandra Angelucci

Prof. Alessandra Angelucci

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake Ciy, UT 84112, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2002 in The Journal of Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Alessandra AngelucciAlessandra Angelucci
Alessandra Angelucci
JLJonathan B. Levitt
Jonathan B. Levitt
EWEmma J. S. Walton
Emma J. S. Walton
JHJean-Michel Hupé
Jean-Michel Hupé
JBJean Bullier
Jean Bullier
JLJennifer S. Lund
Jennifer S. Lund
Contrast-dependent changes in spatial summation and contextual modulation of primary visual cortex (V1) neuron responses to stimulation of their receptive field reveal long-distance integration of visual signals within V1, well beyond the classical receptive field (cRF) of single neurons. To identify the cortical circuits mediating these long-distance computations, we have used a combination of anatomical and physiological recording methods to determine the spatial scale and retinotopic logic of intra-areal V1 horizontal connections and inter-areal feedback connections to V1. We have then compared the spatial scales of these connectional systems to the spatial dimensions of the cRF, spatial summation field (SF), and modulatory surround field of macaque V1 neurons. We find that monosynaptic horizontal connections within area V1 are of an appropriate spatial scale to mediate interactions within the SF of V1 neurons and to underlie contrast-dependent changes in SF size. Contrary to common beliefs, these connections cannot fully account for the dimensions of the surround field. The spatial scale of feedback circuits from extrastriate cortex to V1 is, instead, commensurate with the full spatial range of center–surround interactions. Thus these connections could represent an anatomical substrate for contextual modulation and global-to-local integration of visual signals. Feedback projections connect corresponding and equal-sized regions of the visual field in striate and extrastriate cortices and cover anisotropic parts of visual space, unlike V1 horizontal connections that are isotropic in the macaque. V1 isotropic connectivity demonstrates that anisotropic horizontal connections are not necessary to generate orientation selectivity. Anisotropic feedback connections may play a role in contour completion.


25 July 2017 in Annual Review of Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Alessandra AngelucciAlessandra Angelucci
Alessandra Angelucci
MBMaryam Bijanzadeh
Maryam Bijanzadeh
LNLauri Nurminen
Lauri Nurminen
FFFrederick Federer
Frederick Federer
SMSam Merlin
Sam Merlin
PBPaul C. Bressloff
Paul C. Bressloff
Surround modulation (SM) is a fundamental property of sensory neurons in many species and sensory modalities. SM is the ability of stimuli in the surround of a neuron's receptive field (RF) to modulate (typically suppress) the neuron's response to stimuli simultaneously presented inside the RF, a property thought to underlie optimal coding of sensory information and important perceptual functions. Understanding the circuit and mechanisms for SM can reveal fundamental principles of computations in sensory cortices, from mouse to human. Current debate is centered over whether feedforward or intracortical circuits generate SM, and whether this results from increased inhibition or reduced excitation. Here we present a working hypothesis, based on theoretical and experimental evidence, that SM results from feedforward, horizontal, and feedback interactions with local recurrent connections, via synaptic mechanisms involving both increased inhibition and reduced recurrent excitation. In particular, strong and balanced recurrent excitatory and inhibitory circuits play a crucial role in the computation of SM.

1 March 2003 in Journal of Physiology-Paris
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Alessandra AngelucciAlessandra Angelucci
Alessandra Angelucci
JBJean Bullier
Jean Bullier

11 June 2018 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LNLauri Nurminen
Lauri Nurminen
SMSam Merlin
Sam Merlin
MBMaryam Bijanzadeh
Maryam Bijanzadeh
FFFrederick Federer
Frederick Federer
Alessandra AngelucciAlessandra Angelucci
Alessandra Angelucci
Sensory information travels along feedforward connections through a hierarchy of cortical areas, which, in turn, send feedback connections to lower-order areas. Feedback has been implicated in attention, expectation, and sensory context, but the mechanisms underlying these diverse feedback functions are unknown. Using specific optogenetic inactivation of feedback connections from the secondary visual area (V2), we show how feedback affects neural responses in the primate primary visual cortex (V1). Reducing feedback activity increases V1 cells’ receptive field (RF) size, decreases their responses to stimuli confined to the RF, and increases their responses to stimuli extending into the proximal surround, therefore reducing surround suppression. Moreover, stronger reduction of V2 feedback activity leads to progressive increase in RF size and decrease in response amplitude, an effect predicted by a recurrent network model. Our results indicate that feedback modulates RF size, surround suppression and response amplitude, similar to the modulatory effects of visual spatial attention.

6 September 2006 in Journal of Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LSLars Schwabe
Lars Schwabe
KOKlaus Obermayer
Klaus Obermayer
Alessandra AngelucciAlessandra Angelucci
Alessandra Angelucci
PBPaul C. Bressloff
Paul C. Bressloff
The responses of neurons in sensory cortices are affected by the spatial context within which stimuli are embedded. In the primary visual cortex (V1), orientation-selective responses to stimuli in the receptive field (RF) center are suppressed by similarly oriented stimuli in the RF surround. Surround suppression, a likely neural correlate of perceptual figure–ground segregation, is traditionally thought to be generated within V1 by long-range horizontal connections. Recently however, it has been shown that these connections are too short and too slow to mediate fast suppression from distant regions of the RF surround. We use an anatomically and physiologically constrained recurrent network model of macaque V1 to show how interareal feedback connections, which are faster and longer-range than horizontal connections, can generate “far” surround suppression. We provide a novel solution to the puzzle of how surround suppression can arise from excitatory feedback axons contacting predominantly excitatory neurons in V1. The basic mechanism involves divergent feedback connections from the far surround targeting pyramidal neurons sending monosynaptic horizontal connections to excitatory and inhibitory neurons in the RF center. One of several predictions of our model is that the “suppressive far surround” is not always suppressive, but can facilitate the response of the RF center, depending on the amount of excitatory drive to the local inhibitors. Our model provides a general mechanism of how top-down feedback signals directly contribute to generating cortical neuron responses to simple sensory stimuli.