Commonly consumed foods and beverages can contain chemicals with reported carcinogenic activity in rodent models. Moreover, exposures to some of these substances have been associated with increased cancer risks in humans. Food-borne carcinogens span a range of chemical classes and can arise from natural or anthropogenic sources, as well as form endogenously. Important considerations include the mechanism(s) of action (MoA), their relevance to human biology, and the level of exposure in diet. The MoAs of carcinogens have been classified as either DNA-reactive (genotoxic), involving covalent reaction with nuclear DNA, or epigenetic, involving molecular and cellular effects other than DNA reactivity. Carcinogens are generally present in food at low levels, resulting in low daily intakes, although there are some exceptions. Carcinogens of the DNA-reactive type produce effects at lower dosages than epigenetic carcinogens. Several food-related DNA-reactive carcinogens, including aflatoxins, aristolochic acid, benzene, benzo[a]pyrene and ethylene oxide, are recognized by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as causes of human cancer. Of the epigenetic type, the only carcinogen considered to be associated with increased cancer in humans, although not from low-level food exposure, is dioxin (TCDD). Thus, DNA-reactive carcinogens in food represent a much greater risk than epigenetic carcinogens.

MicroRNA-152-mediated dysregulation of hepatic transferrin receptor 1 in liver carcinogenesis

In the deliberations over many years on the question of thresholds for the carcinogenicity of chemicals, the dominant paradigm has been the linear no-threshold (LNT) model, derived from concepts formulated in radiation mutagenicity. Based on the analogy with radiation, the key mechanistic assumption underlying the assessment of the dose-effect of chemical-induced carcinogenicity has been that any dose, no matter how low, can lead to induction of mutations, which will result in some risk of neoplasia. The LNT assumption, however, was never well founded and, its application to chemical carcinogens, does not allow for differences in their disposition or mechanisms of action. These mechanisms include DNA-reactivity and epigenetic effects, resulting from very different properties of carcinogens, leading to different dose effects. This review of the research on dose effects of chemical carcinogens administered by repeat dosing for long duration reveals that only some experiments involving what are now recognized as DNA-reactive carcinogens yielded dose effects for induction of tumors which were consistent with the absence of a threshold (for 6/14 chemicals). None of these studies, however, included low doses documented not to produce genetic or other cellular toxicities that underlie carcinogenicity. Otherwise, most dose-effect experiments, including all with epigenetic agents (7), revealed no-observed-effect-levels for tumors, indicative of subthreshold doses. Based on highly informative experimental data, including relevant mechanistic data, it is concluded that no-effect-levels exist for both carcinogen-induced precursor effects and neoplasia. Accordingly, we conclude that, at non-toxic dosages, thresholds exist for the induction of experimental cancer by all types of carcinogens.

Certain alkenylbenzenes (AB), flavoring chemicals naturally occurring in spices and herbs, are established to be cytotoxic and hepatocarcinogenic in rodents. The purpose of the present study was to determine the DNA damaging potential of key representatives of this class using the Turkey Egg Genotoxicity Assay. Medium white turkey eggs with 22- to 24-day-old fetuses received three injections of nine AB with different carcinogenic potentials: safrole (1, 2 mg/egg), methyl eugenol (2, 4 mg/egg), estragole (20, 40 mg/egg), myristicin (25, 50 mg/egg), elemicin (20, 50 mg/egg), anethole (5, 10 mg/egg), methyl isoeugenol (40, 80 mg/egg), eugenol (1, 2.5 mg/egg), and isoeugenol (1, 4 mg/egg). Three hours after the last injection, fetal livers were harvested for measurement of DNA strand breaks, using the comet assay and DNA adducts formation, using the nucleotide ³²P-postlabeling assay. Estragole, myristicin, and elemicin induced DNA stand breaks. These compounds as well as safrole, methyl eugenol and anethole, at the highest doses tested, induced DNA adduct formation. Methyl isoeugenol, eugenol, and isoeugenol did not induce genotoxicity. The genotoxic AB all had the structural features of either a double bond in the alkenyl side chain at the terminal 2′,3′-position, favorable to formation of proximate carcinogenic 1′-hydroxymetabolite or terminal epoxide, or the absence of a free phenolic hydroxyl group crucial for formation of a nontoxic glucuronide conjugate. In contrast, methyl isoeugenol, eugenol and isoeugenol, which were nongenotoxic, possessed chemical features, unfavorable to activation.

The presence of furan in common cooked foods along with evidence from experimental studies that lifetime exposure to furan causes liver tumors in rats and mice has caused concern to regulatory public health agencies worldwide; however, the mechanisms of the furan-induced hepatocarcinogenicity remain unclear. The goal of the present study was to investigate whether or not long-term exposure to furan causes epigenetic alterations in rat liver. Treating of male Fisher 344 rats by gavage 5 days per week with 0, 0.92, 2.0, or 4.4 mg furan/kg body weight (bw)/day resulted in dose- and time-dependent epigenetic changes consisting of alterations in DNA methylation and histone lysine methylation and acetylation, altered expression of chromatin modifying genes, and gene-specific methylation. Specifically, exposure to furan at doses 0.92, 2.0, or 4.4 mg furan/kg bw/day caused global DNA demethylation after 360 days of treatment. There was also a sustained decrease in the levels of histone H3 lysine 9 and H4 lysine 20 trimethylation after 180 and 360 days of furan exposure, and a marked reduction of histone H3 lysine 9 and H3 lysine 56 acetylation after 360 days at 4.4 mg/kg bw/day. These histone modification changes were accompanied by a reduced expression of Suv39h1, Prdm2, and Suv4-20h2 histone methyltransferases and Ep300 and Kat2a histone acetyltransferases. Additionally, furan at 2.0 and 4.4 mg/kg bw/day induced hypermethylation-dependent down-regulation of the Rassf1a gene in the livers after 180 and 360 days. These findings indicate possible involvement of dose- and time-dependent epigenetic modifications in the furan hepatotoxicity and carcinogenicity. Key words: Furan; liver; rat; epigenetic changes.

Chemicals with carcinogenic activity in either animals or humans produce increases in neoplasia through diverse mechanisms. One mechanism is reaction with nuclear DNA. Other mechanisms consist of epigenetic effects involving either modifications of regulatory macromolecules or perturbation of cellular regulatory processes. The basis for distinguishing between carcinogens that have either DNA reactivity or an epigenetic activity as their primary mechanism of action is detailed in this review. In addition, important applications of information on these mechanisms of action to carcinogenicity testing and human risk assessment are discussed.