Background: COVID-19 pandemic required a marked re-allocation of healthcare resources, including at Breast Units. A patient-tailored program was developed to assess its efficacy regarding prevention of COVID-19 infection among patients with breast cancer undergoing surgery and healthcare workers (HCWs). Patients and Methods: From March 9th to April 9th 2020, 91 patients were selected for elective surgery by means of: i) Pre-hospital screening aimed at avoiding hospitalization of symptomatic or suspicious COVID-19 patients, and ii) prioritisation of surgical procedure according to specific disease features. Results: Eighty-five patients (93.4%) were fit for surgery, while five patients (5.5%) were temporarily excluded through ‘telephone triage’; another two patients were excluded at in-hospital triage. A total of 71 out of 85 patients (83.5%) were diagnosed with invasive cancer, most of whom were undergoing breast-conserving surgery (61 out of 85 patients, 71.8%). The mean in-hospital stay was 2.2 days (SD=0.7 days). After hospital discharge, no patient needed re-admission due to post-operative complications; moreover, no COVID-19 infection among patients or HCWs was detected. Conclusion: Safe breast cancer surgery was accomplished for both patients and HCWs by means of a careful preoperative selection of patients and in-hospital preventative measures. This screening program can be transferred to high-volume Breast Units and it may be useful in implementing European Community recommendations for prevention of COVID-19 infection.

Background/Aim: Clinicopathological features of patients undergoing margin enlargement after lumpectomy for early breast cancer with positive/close excision margins were analyzed in order to define whether a re-operative procedure could have been avoided. Furthermore, a standardized protocol of specimen orientation was adopted in order to optimize both the widening procedure as well as the oncologic outcome. Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed including pre-, peri-, and post-operative parameters, and a predictive score by means of a multivariate model was developed using all clinically and statistically significant variables associated with residual disease (RD). Results: RD was significantly related to positive tumor margins, hormone receptor negative, HER2-positive, and tumors with high Ki67 proliferation index (p3, only 2 patients (2.0%) had RD, while in 81 patients with a score ≤3, 55 patients (67.9%) had RD (p<0.001). Conclusion: This predictive model might aid in clinical-decision making of patients with positive margins who actually require a widening procedure after intraoperative and/or definitive histology.

Background/Aim: A retrospective study was performed in 246 breast cancer patients to define whether tumor-to-nipple distance (TND) assessment by breast MRI may select patients eligible to nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) as compared to permanent section assessment of retroareolar margin. Patients and Methods: Pre- and post-operative parameters including imaging data, histology of the primary tumor, biologic prognostic factors, and adjuvant regimens were retrieved; patients with close/positive retroareolar margins underwent nipple or NAC excision. The primary endpoint was loco-regional recurrence (LRR). Results: Patients with TND ≤2 cm had a significantly higher rate of invasive ductal carcinoma (p<0.003) and excision margins less than 2 mm (p<0.000). Eleven retroareolar specimens were positive at definitive pathology; final re-excision specimen examination showed residual disease in seven patients (63.6%). At a median follow-up of 31 to 33 months, no NAC recurrence did occur; disease-free survival was more than 96%, and LRR was homogeneously distributed among TND subgroups. Conclusion: Therapeutic NSM is a safe procedure independently of TND assessed at preoperative breast MRI. Permanent section assessment of retroareolar tissue is more accurate and cost-effective than frozen section. Furthermore, delayed nipple and/or NAC excision did not impair local disease control.

Background: The tumescent mastectomy technique has been used to facilitate dissection of subcutaneous tissue and mammary gland in order to reduce intraoperative bleeding and speed the operation. Patients and Methods: A prospective clinical study was performed on 30 female patients undergoing immediate breast reconstructions after skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) or nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) in order to assess early postoperative complications, pain, and final esthetic outcome of skin flaps related to tumescent anesthesia (TA). Results: TA significantly speeded-up the operative procedure (131±49.99 vs. 180.5±67.15 min; p=0.03) achieving less skin damage compared to patients who did not have TA (p=0.045); moreover, no significant difference occurred with regard to the length of in-hospital stay and overall lymphatic drainage. Conclusion: The length of the operation as well as the final cosmetic outcome of skin flaps was significantly improved due to TA, with no appreciable side-effects.

Background/Aim: A retrospective analysis of 388 patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) was performed in order to test the correlation of clearance margin of resection and other host-, tumor- and treatment-related factors with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). Materials and Methods: The pathological analysis was performed according to a standardized protocol: positive margins had DCIS at the inked margin; close margins had tumor between 0.1 to 0.9 mm, or 1 to 1.9 mm, and negative margins were ≥2 mm. Results: At a median follow-up of 90 months there were 26 IBTR (10 invasive and 16 DCIS). Both in univariate and multivariate analysis a significant difference was observed in IBTR by comparing positive versus close/negative margins of excision (p=0.05) and the number of re-operations (p=0.000). Moreover, the actuarial IBTR rates were significantly different in patients with a positive compared to close/negative margins (log-rank test, p=0.042) while the stratification by the margin width (0.1-0.9 mm; 1.0-1.9 mm; ≥2 mm) was not significant (log-rank test, p=0.243). Conclusion: The policy of “no ink on the tumor” can be translated from invasive to DCIS, because the actuarial IBTR rates were significantly different only in patients with a positive, compared to close/negative margins.