Mesenchymal stem/stromal cell small extracellular vesicles (MSC−sEVs) have shown promise in treating a wide range of animal models of various human diseases, which has led to their consideration for clinical translation. However, the possibility of contraindication for MSC−sEV use is an important consideration. One concern is that MSC−sEVs have been shown to induce M2 macrophage polarization, which is known to be pro−fibrotic, potentially indicating contraindication in fibrotic diseases such as liver fibrosis. Despite this concern, previous studies have shown that MSC−sEVs alleviate high−fat diet (HFD)−induced non−alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). To assess whether the pro−fibrotic M2 macrophage polarization induced by MSC−sEVs could worsen liver fibrosis, we first verified that our MSC−sEV preparations could promote M2 polarization in vitro prior to their administration in a mouse model of NASH. Our results showed that treatment with MSC−sEVs reduced or had comparable NAFLD Activity Scores and liver fibrosis compared to vehicle− and Telmisartan−treated animals, respectively. Although CD163⁺ M2 macrophages were increased in the liver, and serum IL−6 levels were reduced in MSC−sEV treated animals, our data suggests that MSC−sEV treatment was efficacious in reducing liver fibrosis in a mouse model of NASH despite an increase in pro−fibrotic M2 macrophage polarization.

The advent of the Omicron variant globally has hastened the requirement for a booster vaccination dose to confer continuous protection against symptomatic SARS-CoV2 infection. However, different vaccines are available in different countries, and individuals who had adverse reactions to certain vaccine types require heterologous vaccine boosters. To understand the efficacy of different vaccination regimens in inducing humoral responses to SARS-CoV2, we examined plasma antibodies and frequencies of Omicron RBD-specific B cells in individuals who had different priming-booster vaccination regimens. We found that individuals with three homologous doses of mRNA vaccines had higher levels of IgG of all subclasses against RBD of Omicron than individuals with three homologous doses of inactivated virus vaccine. A booster with mRNA vaccine resulted in significant increases in median levels of RBD-reactive IgG1 (17–19 fold) and IgG3 (2.3–3.3 fold) as compared to individuals receiving inactivated virus booster shots regardless of priming vaccine types. More importantly, individuals who received a booster dose of mRNA vaccine, irrespective of the priming vaccine, had antibodies with higher neutralizing capability against the Omicron variant than those who received a booster dose of inactivated virus vaccine. Corroborating the antibody results, boosting with the mRNA vaccine increased the frequencies of Omicron RBD-binding B cells by (1.5–3.3 fold) regardless of priming vaccine types. Together, our data demonstrate that an mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273) booster enhances humoral responses against the Omicron variant in individuals vaccinated with either two prior doses of mRNA or inactivated virus vaccine (CoronaVac or BBIBP-CorV), potentially providing more effective protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection, particularly by the Omicron variant.

Introduction: We compared the early total spike antibody (S-Ab) and neutralizing antibody (N-Ab) responses to two vaccines. Methods: We studied 96 Pfizer and 34 Sinovac vaccinees over a 14-month period from January 2021 to February 2022. All vaccinees received three doses of one type of vaccine. Antibody levels (Roche Elecsys total S-Ab and the Snibe N-Ab) were tested 10 days after the first dose, 20 days after the second dose, and 20 days after the booster dose. Results: At all time points, the mRNA vaccine generated higher S-Ab and N-Ab responses than the inactivated virus vaccine (S-Ab: first dose 2.48 vs. 0.4 BAU/mL, second dose 2174 vs. 98 BAU/mL, third dose 15,004 vs. 525 BAU/mL; N-Ab: first dose 0.05 vs. 0.02 µg/mL, second dose 3.48 vs. 0.38 µg/mL, third dose 19.8 vs. 0.89 µg/mL). mRNA vaccine recipients had a 6.2/22.2/28.6-fold higher S-Ab and 2.5/9.2/22.2-fold higher N-Ab response than inactivated virus vaccine recipients after the first/second/third inoculations, respectively. Mann–Whitney U analysis confirmed the significant difference in S-Ab and N-Ab titers between vaccination groups at each time point. Conclusions: The mRNA vaccines generated a more robust S-Ab and N-Ab response than the inactivated virus vaccine at all time points after the first, second, and third vaccinations.

Introduction: We documented the total spike antibody (S-Ab), IgG S-Ab and neutralizing antibody (N-Ab) responses of BNT162b2/CoronaVac vaccinees up to 90 days post-booster dose. Methods: We included 32 homologous regimen CoronaVac vaccinees and 136 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccinees. We tested their total S-Ab (Roche), IgG (Abbott) and N-Ab (Snibe) levels at set time points from January 2021 to April 2022. All subjects were deemed to be COVID-19-naïve either via clinical history (CoronaVac vaccinees) or nucleocapsid antibody testing (BNT162b2 vaccinees). Results: All antibodies peaked 20–30 days post-inoculation. In BNT162b2 vaccinees, all post-booster antibodies were significantly higher than second-dose peaks. In CoronaVac vaccinees, IgG showed no significant differences between peak third-/second-dose titers (difference of 56.0 BAU/mL, 95% CI of −17.1 to 129, p = 0.0894). The post-vaccination titers of all antibodies in BNT162b2 vaccinees were significantly higher than those in CoronaVac vaccinees at all time points. Post-booster, all antibodies declined in 90 days; the final total/IgG/N-Ab titers were 7536 BAU/mL, 1276 BAU/mL and 12.5 μg/mL in BNT162b2 vaccinees and 646 BAU/mL, 62.4 BAU/mL and 0.44 μg/mL in CoronaVac vaccinees. Conclusion: The mRNA vaccine generated more robust total S-Ab, IgG and N-Ab responses after the second and third vaccinations.

The germinal center (GC) dark zone (DZ) and light zone represent distinct anatomical regions in lymphoid tissue where B cell proliferation, immunoglobulin diversification, and selection are coordinated. Diffuse large B cell lymphomas (DLBCLs) with DZ-like gene expression profiles exhibit poor outcomes, though the reasons are unclear and are not directly related to proliferation. Physiological DZs exhibit an exclusion of T cells, prompting exploration of whether T cell paucity contributes to DZ-like DLBCL. We used spatial transcriptomic approaches to achieve higher resolution of T cell spatial heterogeneity in the GC and to derive potential pathways that underlie T cell exclusion. We showed that T cell exclusion from the DZ was linked to DNA damage response (DDR) and chromatin compaction molecular features characterizing the spatial DZ signature, and that these programs were independent of activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) activity. As ATR is a key regulator of DDR, we tested its role in the T cell inhibitory DZ transcriptional imprint. ATR inhibition reversed not only the DZ transcriptional signature, but also DZ T cell exclusion in DZ-like DLBCL in vitro microfluidic models and in in vivo samples of murine lymphoid tissue. These findings highlight that ATR activity underpins a physiological scenario of immune silencing. ATR inhibition may reverse the immune-silent state and enhance T cell–based immunotherapy in aggressive lymphomas with GC DZ–like characteristics.