Muhammad Hafiz Aini

Mr. Muhammad Hafiz Aini

Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 May 2022 in Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RHRakhmad Hidayat
Rakhmad Hidayat
AMAlyssa Putri Mustika
Alyssa Putri Mustika
FAFhathia Avisha
Fhathia Avisha
ZDZlatikha Djuliannisaa
Zlatikha Djuliannisaa
DWDinisa Diah Winari
Dinisa Diah Winari
AGAstuti Giantini
Astuti Giantini
Facing the rising cases of with higher fatalities COVID-19, some countries decided to give the third dose of vaccine as a booster. As of 9 January 2022, 90.31% of health workers in Indonesia have received the third dose vaccine. This study aims to provide an evaluation of adverse events following immunization (AEFI) in a single center in Indonesia to form a basis for ensuring safety for booster administration nationally. A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted using an online survey. Demographic data, AEFI complaints, and factors influencing AEFIs were evaluated. In this study, there were a total of 311 subjects were gathered. The most common AEFI symptoms found at onset <24 h to 28 days were pain at the injection site, fever, shoulder pain, and headache. Most of the AEFI severity of <24 h to 28 days post-vaccination was grade 1 (reduced or uninterrupted daily activities). There was a significant correlation between AEFI and several factors, such as the history of drug allergy, exercise after vaccination, age, BMI < 25, history of symptoms after the first and second vaccinations, and history of COVID-19. There was no anaphylactic reaction in this study. Several AEFI should be considered for the third dose of COVID-19 vaccine administration.

24 August 2022 in Journal of Environmental and Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RHRakhmad Hidayat
Rakhmad Hidayat
ZDZlatikha Djuliannisaa
Zlatikha Djuliannisaa
AMAlyssa Putri Mustika
Alyssa Putri Mustika
GFGemia Clarisa Fathi
Gemia Clarisa Fathi
MAMuhammad Hafiz Aini
Muhammad Hafiz Aini
MPMuhammad Arza Putra
Muhammad Arza Putra
When the outbreak of the COVID‐19 delta variant occurred in June 2021, there was a marked increase in Indonesia’s number of self‐isolated patients. The Universitas Indonesia Hospital provided a One‐Stop Service (OSS) to monitor COVID‐19 patients on self‐isolation. This study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of the self‐isolation monitoring performed by hospitals and the factors that determined the outcomes of patients on self‐isolation. This study was conducted using a cross‐sectional method based on secondary data from electronic medical records. Data analysis was performed by determining the relationship of patient risk factors and characteristics with COVID‐19 outcomes. The study found that poorer symptoms, administration of antibiotics, absence of shortness of breath, and normal ALT levels significantly improved the outcome of OSS patients. The study also suggested that during monitoring of patients on COVID‐19 self‐isolation, chest/thorax radiography is necessary. The self‐isolation monitoring program is essential to observe the patient’s condition and evaluate the possibility of deteriorating conditions that could lead to admission decisions in the early or middle stages of the program. This will be beneficial during pandemic emergencies.

1 April 2024 in Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSharifah Shakinah
Sharifah Shakinah
MAMuhammad Hafiz Aini
Muhammad Hafiz Aini
RSRini Sekartini
Rini Sekartini
SOSoedjatmiko
Soedjatmiko
BMBernie Endyarni Medise
Bernie Endyarni Medise
FSFikrianti Surachman
Fikrianti Surachman
Background: COVID-19 is one of the most devastating pandemics of the 21st century. Vaccination is one of the most effective prevention methods in combating COVID-19, and one type of vaccine being developed was the protein subunit recombinant vaccine. We evaluated the efficacy of the CoV2-IB 0322 vaccine in Depok, Indonesia. Methods: This study aimed to assess the humoral and cellular immune response of the CoV2-IB 0322 vaccine compared to an active control vaccine (COVOVAX™ Vaccine). A total of 120 subjects were enrolled and randomized into two groups, with 60 subjects in each group. Participants received either two doses of the CoV2-IB 0322 vaccine or two doses of the control vaccine with a 28-day interval between doses. Safety assessments were conducted through onsite monitoring and participant-reported adverse events. Immunogenicity was evaluated by measuring IgG anti-RBD SARS-CoV-2 and IgG-neutralizing antibodies. Cellular immunity was assessed by specific T-cell responses. Whole blood samples were collected at baseline, 14 days, 6 months, and 12 months after the second dose for cellular immunity evaluation. Results: Both vaccines showed high seropositive rates, with neutralizing antibody and IgG titers peaking 14 days after the second dose and declining by 12 months. The seroconversion rate of anti-S IgG was 100% in both groups, but the rate of neutralizing antibody seroconversion was lower in the CoV2-IB 0322 vaccine group at 14 days after the second dose (p = 0.004). The CoV2-IB 0322 vaccine showed higher IgG GMT levels 6 and 12 months after the second dose (p < 0.001 and p = 0.01). T-cell responses, evaluated by IFN-γ, IL-2, and IL-4 production by CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells, showed similar results without significant differences between both groups, except for %IL-2/CD4+ cells 6 months after the second dose (p = 0.038). Conclusion: Both vaccines showed comparable B- and T-cell immunological response that diminish over time.