Over recent decades, several publications have described optimization procedures for antibiotic therapy in the individual patient based on antimicrobial MIC values. Most methods include therapeutic drug monitoring and use a single MIC determination plus the relevant pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics to adjust the dose to optimize antimicrobial drug exposure and antibacterial effects. However, the use of an MIC obtained by a single MIC determination is inappropriate. First, routine clinical laboratories cannot determine MICs with sufficient accuracy to guide dosage owing to the inherent assay variation in the MIC test. Second, the variation in any MIC determination, whatever method is used, must be accounted for. If dose adjustments are made based on therapeutic drug monitoring and include MIC determinations, MIC variation must be considered to prevent potential underdosing of patients. We present the problems and some approaches that could be used in clinical practice.

Nitrofurantoin's use has increased exponentially since recent guidelines repositioned it as first-line therapy for uncomplicated lower urinary tract infection (UTI). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess nitrofurantoin's efficacy and toxicity in the treatment of lower UTI. We performed a systematic review of all human controlled clinical trials published from 1946 to 2014 and assessing short-term (≤14 days) nitrofurantoin for lower UTI. Meta-analyses assessing efficacy and adverse events were conducted on randomized trials. Twenty-seven controlled trials including 4807 patients fulfilled entry criteria; most were conducted between the 1970s and 1990s and were at increased risk for various biases. Nitrofurantoin appears to have good clinical and microbiological efficacy for UTI caused by common uropathogens, with clinical cure rates varying between 79% and 92%. The most methodologically robust studies surveyed indicate overall equivalence between nitrofurantoin when given for 5 or 7 days and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin and amoxicillin. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials confirmed equivalence in clinical cure, but indicated a slight advantage to comparator drugs in microbiological efficacy (risk ratio 0.93, 95% CI 0.89–0.97). If given for only 3 days, nitrofurantoin's clinical efficacy was diminished (61%–70%). Toxicity was infrequent (5%–16% in the 17 reporting studies), mild, reversible and predominantly gastrointestinal; meta-analyses confirmed no difference between nitrofurantoin and comparators. Hypersensitivity reactions such as pulmonary fibrosis and hepatotoxicity were not observed. Acquisition of resistance to nitrofurantoin is still relatively rare. When given short term for lower UTI, nitrofurantoin has good clinical and microbiological efficacy; toxicity is mild and predominantly gastrointestinal.

Nitrofurantoin and nitroxoline are oral antibiotics for the treatment or prophylaxis of acute urinary tract infections. New interest in both these drugs is increasing because of the emergence of resistance to other antibiotics, but knowledge of their pharmacokinetics (PK) is lacking since they were developed before the advent of standardized research for drug approval. The aims of this review were to (i) summarize the PK data reported in the literature and (ii) to identify PK knowledge gaps. The current body of PK knowledge of both drugs appears to be poor and mainly based on old studies. Nitrofurantoin PK values were obtained from studies using many variables, e.g. formulations, crystal sizes and analytical methods, resulting in high interindividual variability in PK parameters and no uniform PK profile. Clinical experience and PK data for nitroxoline are even more limited since the drug is registered in only Germany and a few (Eastern European) countries. Clinical studies in relevant patient populations are needed with commercially available nitrofurantoin and nitroxoline formulations at approved dosing regimens to more fully characterize their PK profiles, and to investigate the influence of patient characteristics on these profiles in order to optimize efficacy and avoid toxicity and emergence of resistance. Only with this updated knowledge and efficacy data from well-structured trials can both drugs maintain their antimicrobial activity against uropathogens.

Objectives The %fT > MIC of ceftazidime has been shown to correlate with microbiological outcome of Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) in preclinical studies. However, clinical data are still lacking. We explored the relationship of ceftazidime exposure and outcome in patients with nosocomial pneumonia using data from a recent randomized, double-blind Phase 3 clinical trial. Patients and methods Pharmacokinetic (PK) and demographic data from three clinical trials were used to construct a population PK model using non-linear mixed-effects modelling. Individual concentration–time curves and PK/pharmacodynamic indices were determined for individual patients. The MICs used in the analyses were the highest MICs for any GNB cultured at baseline or end of therapy. Results A two-compartment model best fit the data, with creatinine clearance as covariate on clearance and age on the central compartment. Classification and regression tree analysis showed a breakpoint value of 44.9% (P < 0.0001) for GNB in 154 patients. The Emax model showed a good fit (R² = 0.93). The benefit of adequate treatment increased from an eradication rate of 0.4848 at %fT > MIC of 0% to 0.9971 at 100%. The EC₅₀ was 46.8% and the EC₉₀ was 95.5% for %fT > MIC. Exposure correlated significantly with both microbiological and clinical outcome at test-of-cure. Conclusions We conclude that exposures to ceftazidime predict microbiological as well as clinical outcome, and the %fT > MIC required to result in a likely favourable outcome is >45% of the dosing interval. This value is similar to that observed in animal models and underscores the principle that adequate dosing can be predicted and is beneficial to patient care.