The long-acting antiretroviral cabotegravir and rilpivirine combination has just received FDA, EMA and Health Canada approval. This novel drug delivery approach is about to revolutionize the therapy of people living with HIV, decreasing the 365 daily pill burden to only six intramuscular injections per year. In addition, islatravir, a first-in-class nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor, is intended to be formulated as an implant with a dosing interval of 1 year or more. At present, long-acting antiretroviral therapies (LA-ARTs) are given at fixed standard doses, irrespectively of the patient’s weight and BMI, and without consideration for host genetic and non-genetic factors likely influencing their systemic disposition. Despite a few remaining challenges related to administration (e.g. pain, dedicated medical procedure), the development and implementation of LA-ARTs can overcome long-term adherence issues by improving patients’ privacy and reducing social stigma associated with the daily oral intake of anti-HIV treatments. Yet, the current ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach does not account for the recognized significant inter-individual variability in LA-ART pharmacokinetics. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), an important tool for precision medicine, may provide physicians with valuable information on actual drug exposure in patients, contributing to improve their management in real life. The present review aims to update the current state of knowledge on these novel promising LA-ARTs and discusses their implications, particularly from a clinical pharmacokinetics perspective, for the future management and prevention of HIV infection, issues of ongoing importance in the absence of curative treatment or an effective vaccine.

The efficacy and tolerability of long-acting cabotegravir and rilpivirine were demonstrated in Phase III trials. However, low concentrations combined with other risk factors have been associated with an increased risk of virologic failure. This study aims to verify whether drug concentrations measured in a real-world setting are consistent with those previously reported. SHCS-879 is a nationwide observational study within the Swiss HIV Cohort Study for the monitoring of people with HIV (PWH) on long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine. Samples were collected from March 2022 to March 2023. Overall, 725 samples were obtained from 186 PWH. Our data show a large inter-individual variability in cabotegravir and rilpivirine concentrations, with some individuals exhibiting repeatedly low concentrations. Rilpivirine trough concentrations were consistent with those from Phase III trials, while cabotegravir concentrations were lower. The first concentrations quartile was only slightly above the target of 664 ng/mL. Exploratory statistical analyses found 35% (p < 0·01) lower cabotegravir trough in males compared to females. Overall, 172 PWH (92%) remained suppressed and three experienced virologic failures (1·6%), of those, two had sub-optimal drug exposure. No association was found between low trough levels and detectable viral load. Real-world cabotegravir concentrations are substantially lower than previously reported. However, these concentrations appear sufficient to ensure sustained virological suppression in almost every PWH. These reassuring data challenge the rather conservative thresholds adopted to date, which may raise unnecessary concerns. Yet, our study reveals that some PWH have repeatedly very low drug levels, for reasons that remain to be elucidated. This work was funded by the 10.13039/501100001711 Swiss National Science Foundation , grant number N^◦ 324730_192449. This study received no support from pharmaceutical industries. This study was performed within the framework of the Swiss HIV Cohort Study, supported by the 10.13039/501100001711 Swiss National Science Foundation (grant #201369), by SHCS project #879, and by the SHCS research foundation. The SHCS data were gathered by the Five Swiss University Hospitals, two Cantonal Hospitals, 15 affiliated hospitals and 36 private physicians (listed in http://www.shcs.ch/180-health-care-providers).

HIV cure has been reported for five individuals who received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) from CCR5Δ32 homozygous donors. In contrast, viral rebound has occurred in other people living with HIV who interrupted antiretroviral treatment after receiving allo-HSCT, mostly from wild-type CCR5 donors. Here, we report the case of a male who has achieved durable HIV remission following allo-HSCT from an unrelated HLA-matched (9/10 matching for HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1 and -DQB1 alleles) wild-type CCR5 donor to treat an extramedullary myeloid tumor. To date, plasma viral load has remained undetectable for 32 months after the interruption of antiretroviral treatment. Treatment with ruxolitinib has been maintained during this period to treat chronic graft versus host disease. Low levels of proviral DNA were detected sporadically post-allo-HSCT, including defective but not intact HIV DNA. No virus could be amplified in cultures of CD4 + T cells obtained post antiretroviral treatment interruption, while CD4 + T cells remained susceptible to HIV-1 infection in vitro. Decline of HIV antibodies and undetectable HIV-specific T cell responses further corroborate the absence of viral rebound after antiretroviral treatment interruption. These results suggest that HIV remission could be achieved in the context of allo-HSCT with wild-type CCR5.

The interpretation of long-acting cabotegravir and rilpivirine concentrations is complicated by the lack of consensus on the threshold to consider. Building on real-world therapeutic drug monitoring data and documented virologic failures, this article provides a reappraisal of the existing thresholds and guidance for the interpretation of cabotegravir and rilpivirine concentrations.

SHCS#879 is an ongoing Switzerland-wide multicenter observational study conducted within the Swiss HIV Cohort Study (SHCS) for the prospective follow-up of people living with HIV (PLWH) receiving long-acting injectable cabotegravir-rilpivirine (LAI-CAB/RPV). All adults under LAI-CAB/RPV and part of SHCS are enrolled in the project. The study addresses an integrated strategy of treatment monitoring outside the stringent frame of controlled clinical trials, based on relevant patient characteristics, clinical factors, potential drug-drug interactions, and measurement of circulating blood concentrations. So far, 91 blood samples from 46 PLWH have been collected. Most individuals are less than 50 years old, with relatively few comorbidities and comedications. The observed concentrations are globally in accordance with the available values reported in the randomized clinical trials. Yet, low RPV concentrations not exceeding twice the reported protein-adjusted 90% inhibitory concentration have been observed. Data available at present confirm a considerable between-patient variability overall. Based on the growing amount of PK data accumulated during this ongoing study, population pharmacokinetic analysis will characterize individual concentration-time profiles of LAI-CAB/RPV along with their variability in a real-life setting and their association with treatment response and tolerability, thus bringing key data for therapeutic monitoring and precision dosage adjustment of this novel long-acting therapy.

Background: Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) combines population pharmacokinetic knowledge with therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to optimize dosage adjustment. It could improve target concentration attainment over empirical TDM, still widely practised for broad-spectrum antibiotics. Objectives: To evaluate the respective performance of TDM and MIPD in achieving target piperacillin exposure. Methods: Measurements from 80 courses of intermittent piperacillin infusions, each with two TDM samples, were retrospectively submitted to our MIPD software TUCUXI. We considered six dosage adjustment strategies: identical dosage for all (4000 mg q8h), actual initial dosage (chart-based), actual empirical adjustment following first TDM, a priori MIPD-based dosage, a posteriori MIPD-based adjustment after first TDM and MIPD including both TDM measurements. Dosing strategies were compared regarding daily dosage, trough levels distribution and PTA (with target trough 8–32 mg/L). Results: Median trough concentration fell within 8–32 mg/L for all strategies except a priori MIPD-based dosage (42 mg/L). Distributions of trough concentrations predicted with the six dosage adjustment strategies showed significant differences, with both a posteriori MIPD-based strategies best reducing their standard deviation (P < 0.001). PTA of 32%, 32%, 55%, 29%, 83% and 94% were estimated, respectively for the six strategies (P < 0.001). Poor performance of a priori MIPD-based dosage did not hinder a posteriori MIPD-based strategies from significantly improving target attainment. Conclusions: Whilst empirical TDM improves exposure standardization and target attainment compared with no TDM, MIPD can still bring further improvement. Prospective trials remain warranted to confirm MIPD benefits not only on target attainment but also on clinical endpoints.