Background: Vertebral fractures are the most common osteoporotic fractures in older individuals. Recent studies suggest that the performance of artificial intelligence is equal to humans in detecting osteoporotic fractures, such as fractures of the hip, distal radius, and proximal humerus. However, whether artificial intelligence performs as well in the detection of vertebral fractures on plain lateral spine radiographs has not yet been reported. Questions/purposes: (1) What is the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and interobserver reliability (kappa value) of an artificial intelligence model in detecting vertebral fractures, based on Genant fracture grades, using plain lateral spine radiographs compared with values obtained by human observers? (2) Do patients’ clinical data, including the anatomic location of the fracture (thoracic or lumbar spine), T-score on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, or fracture grade severity, affect the performance of an artificial intelligence model? (3) How does the artificial intelligence model perform on external validation? Methods: Between 2016 and 2018, 1019 patients older than 60 years were treated for vertebral fractures in our institution. Seventy-eight patients were excluded because of missing CT or MRI scans (24% [19]), poor image quality in plain lateral radiographs of spines (54% [42]), multiple myeloma (5% [4]), and prior spine instrumentation (17% [13]). The plain lateral radiographs of 941 patients (one radiograph per person), with a mean age of 76 ± 12 years, and 1101 vertebral fractures between T7 and L5 were retrospectively evaluated for training (n = 565), validating (n = 188), and testing (n = 188) of an artificial intelligence deep-learning model. The gold standard for diagnosis (ground truth) of a vertebral fracture is the interpretation of the CT or MRI reports by a spine surgeon and a radiologist independently. If there were any disagreements between human observers, the corresponding CT or MRI images would be rechecked by them together to reach a consensus. For the Genant classification, the injured vertebral body height was measured in the anterior, middle, and posterior third. Fractures were classified as Grade 1 (< 25%), Grade 2 (26% to 40%), or Grade 3 (> 40%). The framework of the artificial intelligence deep-learning model included object detection, data preprocessing of radiographs, and classification to detect vertebral fractures. Approximately 90 seconds was needed to complete the procedure and obtain the artificial intelligence model results when applied clinically. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, interobserver reliability (kappa value), receiver operating characteristic curve, and area under the curve (AUC) were analyzed. The bootstrapping method was applied to our testing dataset and external validation dataset. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were used to investigate whether fracture anatomic location or T-score in dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry report affected the performance of the artificial intelligence model. The receiver operating characteristic curve and AUC were used to investigate the relationship between the performance of the artificial intelligence model and fracture grade. External validation with a similar age population and plain lateral radiographs from another medical institute was also performed to investigate the performance of the artificial intelligence model. Results: The artificial intelligence model with ensemble method demonstrated excellent accuracy (93% [773 of 830] of vertebrae), sensitivity (91% [129 of 141]), and specificity (93% [644 of 689]) for detecting vertebral fractures of the lumbar spine. The interobserver reliability (kappa value) of the artificial intelligence performance and human observers for thoracic and lumbar vertebrae were 0.72 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.80; p < 0.001) and 0.77 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.83; p < 0.001), respectively. The AUCs for Grades 1, 2, and 3 vertebral fractures were 0.919, 0.989, and 0.990, respectively. The artificial intelligence model with ensemble method demonstrated poorer performance for discriminating normal osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae, with a specificity of 91% (260 of 285) compared with nonosteoporotic lumbar vertebrae, with a specificity of 95% (222 of 234). There was a higher sensitivity 97% (60 of 62) for detecting osteoporotic (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry T-score ≤ -2.5) lumbar vertebral fractures, implying easier detection, than for nonosteoporotic vertebral fractures (83% [39 of 47]). The artificial intelligence model also demonstrated better detection of lumbar vertebral fractures compared with detection of thoracic vertebral fractures based on the external dataset using various radiographic techniques. Based on the dataset for external validation, the overall accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity on bootstrapping method were 89%, 83%, and 95%, respectively. Conclusion: The artificial intelligence model detected vertebral fractures on plain lateral radiographs with high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, especially for osteoporotic lumbar vertebral fractures (Genant Grades 2 and 3). The rapid reporting of results using this artificial intelligence model may improve the efficiency of diagnosing vertebral fractures. The testing model is available at http://140.113.114.104/vght_demo/corr/. One or multiple plain lateral radiographs of the spine in the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine format can be uploaded to see the performance of the artificial intelligence model. Level of Evidence: Level II, diagnostic study.

Background - Non-pulmonary vein (NPV) trigger has been reported as an important predictor of recurrence post-atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Elimination of NPV triggers can reduce the recurrence of post-ablation AF. Deep learning was applied to pre-ablation pulmonary vein computed tomography (PVCT) geometric slices to create a prediction model for NPV triggers in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Methods - We retrospectively analyzed 521 PAF patients who underwent catheter ablation of PAF. Among them, PVCT geometric slices from 358 non-recurrent AF patients (1-3 mm interspace per slice, 20-200 slices for each patient, ranging from the upper border of the left atrium to the bottom of the heart, for a total of 23683 images of slices) were used in the deep learning process, the ResNet34 of the neural network, to create the prediction model of the NPV trigger. There were 298 (83.2%) patients with only pulmonary vein (PV) triggers and 60 (16.8%) patients with NPV triggers +/- PV triggers. The patients were randomly assigned to either training, validation or test groups and their data was allocated according to those sets. The image datasets were split into training (n=17340), validation (n=3491), and testing (n=2852) groups, which had completely independent sets of patients. Results - The accuracy of prediction in each PVCT image for NPV trigger was up to 82.4±2.0%. The sensitivity and specificity were 64.3±5.4% and 88.4±1.9%, respectively. For each patient, the accuracy of prediction for a NPV trigger was 88.6±2.3%. The sensitivity and specificity were 75.0±5.8% and 95.7±1.8%, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) for each image and patient were 0.82±0.01 and 0.88±0.07, respectively. Conclusions - The deep learning model using pre-ablation PVCT can be applied to predict the trigger origins in PAF patients receiving catheter ablation. The application of this model may identify patients with a high risk of NPV trigger before ablation.

Queue dissipation has been extensively studied about traffic signalization, work zone operations, and ramp metering. Various methods for estimating the intersection’s queue length and dissipation time have been reported in the literature, including the use of car-following models with simulation, vehicle trajectories from GPS, shock-wave theory, statistical estimation from traffic flow patterns, and artificial neural networks (ANN). However, most of such methods cannot account for the impacts of interactions between different vehicle types and their spatial distributions in the queue length on the initial discharge time and the resulting total dissipation duration. As such, this study presents a system, named TrafficTalk, that applies a deep learning-based method to reliably capture the queue characteristics of mixed traffic flows, and produce a robust estimate of the dissipating duration for the design of the optimal signal plan. The proposed TrafficTalk, featuring the effectiveness in transforming video-imaged traffic conditions into vehicle density maps, has proved its performance under extensive field evaluations. For instance, compared with the benchmark model, XGBoost in the literature, it has reduced the MAPE from 25.8% to 10.4%., and from 31.3% to 10.4% if the queue discharging stream comprises motorcycles.

Automated glaucoma detection using deep learning may increase the diagnostic rate of glaucoma to prevent blindness, but generalizable models are currently unavailable despite the use of huge training datasets. This study aims to evaluate the performance of a convolutional neural network (CNN) classifier trained with a limited number of high-quality fundus images in detecting glaucoma and methods to improve its performance across different datasets. A CNN classifier was constructed using EfficientNet B3 and 944 images collected from one medical center (core model) and externally validated using three datasets. The performance of the core model was compared with (1) the integrated model constructed by using all training images from the four datasets and (2) the dataset-specific model built by fine-tuning the core model with training images from the external datasets. The diagnostic accuracy of the core model was 95.62% but dropped to ranges of 52.5–80.0% on the external datasets. Dataset-specific models exhibited superior diagnostic performance on the external datasets compared to other models, with a diagnostic accuracy of 87.50–92.5%. The findings suggest that dataset-specific tuning of the core CNN classifier effectively improves its applicability across different datasets when increasing training images fails to achieve generalization.

Background: Traditional methods for investigating work hours rely on an employee’s physical presence at the worksite. However, accurately identifying break times at the worksite and distinguishing remote work outside the worksite poses challenges in work hour estimations. Machine learning has the potential to differentiate between human-smartphone interactions at work and off work. Objective: In this study, we aimed to develop a novel approach called “probability in work mode,” which leverages human-smartphone interaction patterns and corresponding GPS location data to estimate work hours. Methods: To capture human-smartphone interactions and GPS locations, we used the “Staff Hours” app, developed by our team, to passively and continuously record participants’ screen events, including timestamps of notifications, screen on or off occurrences, and app usage patterns. Extreme gradient boosted trees were used to transform these interaction patterns into a probability, while 1-dimensional convolutional neural networks generated successive probabilities based on previous sequence probabilities. The resulting probability in work mode allowed us to discern periods of office work, off-work, breaks at the worksite, and remote work. Results: Our study included 121 participants, contributing to a total of 5503 person-days (person-days represent the cumulative number of days across all participants on which data were collected and analyzed). The developed machine learning model exhibited an average prediction performance, measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, of 0.915 (SD 0.064). Work hours estimated using the probability in work mode (higher than 0.5) were significantly longer (mean 11.2, SD 2.8 hours per day) than the GPS-defined counterparts (mean 10.2, SD 2.3 hours per day; P<.001). This discrepancy was attributed to the higher remote work time of 111.6 (SD 106.4) minutes compared to the break time of 54.7 (SD 74.5) minutes. Conclusions: Our novel approach, the probability in work mode, harnessed human-smartphone interaction patterns and machine learning models to enhance the precision and accuracy of work hour investigation. By integrating human-smartphone interactions and GPS data, our method provides valuable insights into work patterns, including remote work and breaks, offering potential applications in optimizing work productivity and well-being.