Myasthenia gravis is an antibody-mediated autoimmune condition characterized by defects in cholinergic transmission at the neuromuscular junction. In AchR antibody-positive patients, complement activation plays a prominent role in the disease process, which appears to be mediated by the activation of the membrane attack complex. Since IgG4 is not a good complement activator, the role of complement in MuSK antibody-positive myasthenia gravis patients is negligible. Experimental animal models of myasthenia gravis have shown promise with the antagonism of different elements of the complement cascade, with positive clinical outcomes. This has led to the development of the first C5 inhibitors approved for myasthenia gravis with AchR antibodies: eculizumab, ravulizumab, and zilucoplan. Other clinical trials are currently in progress, investigating the potential therapeutic role of other targets, including the Factor B inhibition or hepatic synthesis of the C5 protein. Other proposed potential targets that have not yet been clinically tested are also discussed in this review article.

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (iCPI) in the treatment of multiple cancers has gained prominence due to their high efficacy. However, neurological immune-related adverse events (irAEs) such as myasthenia gravis (MG) have been associated with iCPI therapy. Most of these neurological irAEs are rare, and in many cases, their diagnoses and management can be challenging. We present a case of a 70-year-old woman with stage IIIC melanoma who developed a new onset of gradually progressive dyspnea, diplopia, and bilateral ptosis following treatment with one cycle of nivolumab and ipilimumab (Nivo+Ipi). She was diagnosed with MG via positive serum acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies. She had developed a severe dyspnea at rest, which was refractory to multiple immune-suppressive therapies including prednisone, pyridostigmine, and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Subsequently, she was treated with rituximab 375 mg/m² monthly every four weeks with significant improvement of her symptoms within 48 hours each time. As the implementation of immunotherapy increases in medical practice, irAEs may become more apparent. When first-line therapies are not adequate, other alternative therapies should be explored. This case of MG as an irAE shows that rituximab can provide a potential benefit to treating patients with immunotherapy-induced MG who are refractory to other standard treatments. Prospective studies are needed to further evaluate the efficacy of rituximab in the management of irAEs.

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Metastases in the brain are a common hallmark of advanced stages of the disease, contributing to a dismal prognosis. Lung cancer can be broadly classified as either small cell lung cancer (SCLC) or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). NSCLC represents the most predominant histology subtype of lung cancer, accounting for the majority of lung cancer cases. Recent advances in molecular genetics, coupled with innovations in small molecule drug discovery strategies, have facilitated both the molecular classification and precision targeting of NSCLC based on oncogenic driver mutations. Furthermore, these precision-based strategies have demonstrable efficacy across the blood–brain barrier, leading to positive outcomes in patients with brain metastases. This review provides an overview of the clinical features of lung cancer brain metastases, as well as the molecular mechanisms that drive NSCLC oncogenesis. We also explore how precision medicine-based strategies can be leveraged to improve NSCLC brain metastases.

Brain metastases are the most commonly diagnosed type of central nervous system tumor, yet the mechanisms of their occurrence are still widely unknown. Lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma are the most common etiologies, but renal and colorectal cancers have also been described as metastasizing to the brain. Regardless of their origin, there are common mechanisms for progression to all types of brain metastases, such as the creation of a suitable tumor microenvironment in the brain, priming of tumor cells, adaptations to survive spreading in lymphatic and blood vessels, and development of mechanisms to penetrate the blood–brain barrier. However, there are complex genetic and molecular interactions that are specific to every type of primary tumor, making the understanding of the metastatic progression of tumors to the brain a challenging field of study. In this review, we aim to summarize current knowledge on the pathophysiology of brain metastases, from specific genetic characteristics of commonly metastatic tumors to the molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in progression to the central nervous system. We also briefly discuss current challenges in targeted therapies for brain metastases and how there is still a gap in knowledge that needs to be overcome to improve patient outcomes.

Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) are defined as remote neurologic immune-mediated effects triggered by underlying systemic tumors. While recognizing specific syndromes can aid early cancer detection, overutilization of paraneoplastic assays in the absence of a classic syndrome can precipitate overdiagnosis and overtreatment. PNS involve autoantibodies targeting intracellular or extracellular antigens, with variable immunotherapy responses based on antigen type. Diagnosing PNS is challenging, requiring exclusion of other differential diagnoses. New diagnostic criteria classify PNS into high-risk and intermediate-risk phenotypes based on clinical phenotype, neuronal antibodies, and cancer presence. Patients with cell surface antibodies respond better to immunotherapies compared to those with intracellular antigen targets. Understanding PNS syndromes, serological markers, and oncological features guides management, which facilitates initiation of immunosuppression for PNS alongside treatment of the underlying neoplasm, thereby improving neurologic and oncologic outcomes. Initial treatments often include intravenous methylprednisolone, plasma exchange, or intravenous immunoglobulins. Second-line immunosuppressants like rituximab or cyclophosphamide may be necessary if initial treatments fail. Specific therapies vary based on antibody target. Here, we summarize the current approach to the investigation, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with suspected PNS. ^* Co–first authors Article published online: 06 January 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

Patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) typically present with non‑focal neurological symptoms, including disorientation, poor balance and memory loss with unifocal or multifocal periventricular lesions seen on MRI. Deviations from these characteristic findings can delay diagnosis and lead to additional diagnostic tests being needed. The present study reports a 68‑year‑old man with a recent varicella zoster infection and history of acetylcholine receptor antibody‑positive myasthenia gravis who received mycophenolate mofetil for 22 years. He presented with left eye vision changes and cognitive memory deficits. A brain MRI showed an enhancing lesion within his left medulla extending to the cerebellum. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis was positive for Epstein‑Barr virus (EBV) and negative for malignancy. He was diagnosed with varicella zoster virus vasculopathy. At 3 months later, a repeat brain MRI showed multiple new enhancing lesions developing bilaterally along the periventricular white matter. Soon after, he presented to a local ER with acute left‑sided blurry vision and worsening memory loss, and he began receiving steroids. Because of rapid symptom progression, he underwent resection of the left frontal lesion, which showed EBV‑induced diffuse large B‑cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Mycophenolate mofetil was discontinued, and within 24 h of one dose of intravenous 500 mg/m2 rituximab, he had a dramatic improvement in left eye vision and memory loss. He experienced mixed responses to rituximab after 3 cycles. Following one dose of high‑dose methotrexate, he developed subsequent chronic kidney disease and required dialysis. He received whole‑brain radiation therapy with craniospinal radiation and is currently in complete remission. An EBV‑induced DLBCL diagnosis should be highly considered for patients with periventricular lesions and EBV‑positive cerebrospinal fluid. Misdiagnosis or delay in PCNSL diagnosis because of atypical features in disease presentation and radiographic findings could lead to PCNSL progression and worsening neurological deficits.