Zoologic medicine practitioners take approved agents (veterinary or human) and extrapolate their use to nonapproved species. The decision on dose, duration, and interval is often made with limited species-specific pharmacokinetic information. Because of the monetary value of these animals or their status as endangered species, this method of "trial and error" for therapeutic dosage selection is inappropriate. In zoologic medicine, various methods have been used in an attempt to extrapolate or predict safe and effective dosage regimens. The simplest and typical method of extrapolating a dosage to a nondomestic species is to use a mg/kg dose established for another domestic species or humans. However, this calculation results in a linear increase in the amount of drug administered as body weight increases. Although common, this method tends to overdose large animals and underdose small animals. The second method is similar, except that it takes the approved dose in a specific species and makes an additional assumption that links the dosage to a physiologic function or anatomic feature. Examples are the use of basal metabolic rate or body-surface area as the basis for dosage extrapolation. Allometric scaling of pharmacokinetic parameters is the final method of dosage extrapolation between species. This is commonly used in the pharmaceutical industry to establish the first dosage in human drug investigations. Adaptation of this method for zoologic medicine may enhance our ability to estimate therapeutic dosages for nondomestic species. This review discusses and compares these three methods for dosage selection and provides examples of extrapolation from the literature.
1 October 2008 in Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
The occurrence of ciprofloxacin (CIP), sulfamethoxazole (SMX), and azithromycin (AZI) was evaluated in various aqueous streams of four municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in the Midwestern United States. Aqueous phase grab samples were collected from different locations in the WWTPs at four different times of the year. The target compounds were extracted using solid phase extraction, separated with high-performance liquid chromatography, and identified/quantified using ultraviolet and fluorescence spectroscopy (CIP and SMX) or mass spectrometry (AZI). Aqueous phase concentrations for CIP and AZI were similar to literature values while SMX concentrations were generally higher than those reported in the literature. The average aqueous phase concentrations for CIP, AZI, and SMX in the raw wastewater were 1.44, 1.11, and 18.3 μg∕L , respectively, while the concentrations in the WWTP effluent were 0.59, 1.23, and 3.25 μg∕L , respectively. AZI concentration was consistently lower in the winter. While ...
6 September 2006 in Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics
The nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) meloxicam is a very popular anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and antipyretic agent used in veterinary medicine. To determine the pharmacokinetics of this NSAID in rabbits following a single dose and 10-day period of dosing, eight clinically normal, 8-mo-old New Zealand white rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) were administered 0.2 mg/kg meloxicam p.o. daily. Pharmacokinetic analysis of the meloxicam was determined via noncompartmental analysis. After oral administration, mean +/- standard deviation values for area under the curve were 1.8 +/- 0.50 and 2.1 +/- 0.55 microg x h/ml, and maximum plasma concentrations were 0.17 +/- 0.06 and 0.24 +/- 0.07 microg/ml for Day 1 and Day 10, respectively. The half-life was approximately 8 hr. Administration of meloxicam at a dosage of 0.2 to 0.3 mg/kg p.o. every 24 hr is suggested. Although a higher dose may be required for optimum effects, this would require efficacy and safety studies in this species. Meloxicam administered at 0.2 mg/kg p.o. daily for 10 day was well tolerated by the rabbits.
1 January 2003 in American Journal of Veterinary Research
Objective—To assess oral bioavailability (F) and pharmacokinetic characteristics of the R- and S-enantiomers of ketoprofen administered IV and orally to captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximus). Animals—5 adult Asian elephants. Procedure—Elephants received single treatments of racemic ketoprofen at a dose of 2.2 mg/kg, administered IV and orally, in a complete crossover design. Blood samples were collected at intervals during the 24 hours following treatment. At least 4 weeks elapsed between drug administrations. Samples were analyzed for R- and S-ketoprofen with a validated liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopic assay. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by use of noncompartmental analysis. Results—The enantiomers of ketoprofen were absorbed well after oral administration, with median F of 101% for R-ketoprofen and 85% for S-ketoprofen. Harmonic mean half-life ranged from 3.8 to 5.5 hours, depending on route of administration and enantiomer. The area under the concentration-time curve, mean residence time, apparent volume of distribution, plasma clearance, and maximum plasma concentration values were all significantly different between the 2 enantiomers for both routes of administration. Conclusion and Clinical Relevance—Ketoprofen has a long terminal half-life and complete absorption in this species. Based on the pharmacokinetic data, a dosage of ketoprofen of 1 mg/kg every 48 hours to 2 mg/kg every 24 hours, PO or IV, is recommended for use in Asian elephants, although the safety and efficacy of ketoprofen during long-term administration in elephants have not been determined. (Am J Vet Res 2003;64:109–114)