Sanaullah Panezai

Dr. Sanaullah Panezai

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2016 in International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSShahab E. Saqib
Shahab E. Saqib
Mokbul Morshed AhmadMokbul Morshed Ahmad
Mokbul Morshed Ahmad
SPSanaullah Panezai
Sanaullah Panezai
UAUbaid Ali
Ubaid Ali

1 May 2018 in Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SSShahab E. Saqib
Shahab E. Saqib
JKJohn K. M. Kuwornu
John K. M. Kuwornu
SPSanaullah Panezai
Sanaullah Panezai
UAUbaid Ali
Ubaid Ali

1 September 2016 in International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSShahab E. Saqib
Shahab E. Saqib
Mokbul Morshed AhmadMokbul Morshed Ahmad
Mokbul Morshed Ahmad
SPSanaullah Panezai
Sanaullah Panezai
IRIRFAN AHMAD Rana
IRFAN AHMAD Rana

16 November 2016 in Development in Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSShahab E. Saqib
Shahab E. Saqib
Mokbul Morshed AhmadMokbul Morshed Ahmad
Mokbul Morshed Ahmad
SPSanaullah Panezai
Sanaullah Panezai
This article reports on a study that aimed to investigate the differences in access to, and utilisation of, agricultural credit among subsistence farmers in Pakistan. Primary data were collected from 87 randomly selected subsistence farmers. Results show that subsistence farmers with more land had greater access and utilisation, and that education, experience, type of farmer, and landholding size were significant factors influencing access to credit. As subsistence farmers with the least land were the most disadvantaged, there is a need for revamping the credit policy to protect their interests. Moreover, simplifying the existing complex procedures involved in securing agricultural credit is highly recommended.

10 August 2017 in Development in Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SPSanaullah Panezai
Sanaullah Panezai
Mokbul Morshed AhmadMokbul Morshed Ahmad
Mokbul Morshed Ahmad
SSShahab E. Saqib
Shahab E. Saqib
This article explores access to primary health care (PHC) services and associated factors in Pakistan. Data were collected from 302 respondents. The findings revealed that women accessed PHC services more than men due to their greater health needs. However, a large proportion of both genders did not access any PHC services. Besides general weaknesses, gender-related barriers were found in basic health unit locations, distance, transport, staff availability, income, service hours, and service organisation, confirming gender issues in access to PHC services. Policymakers are recommended to take measures to improve access to PHC services through the formulation of gender-responsive policies and strategies.

4 October 2019 in Family Medicine and Community Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSShahab E. Saqib
Shahab E. Saqib
Mokbul Morshed AhmadMokbul Morshed Ahmad
Mokbul Morshed Ahmad
SPSanaullah Panezai
Sanaullah Panezai
Objectives This study aimed to validate the Medical Outcome Study–Social Support Survey (MOS-SSS) instrument in Pakistan and to quantify the nature of care and social support currently extended to patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) in Pakistan. Design This is a cross-sectional study design conducted within a period of 3 months from 1 November 2016 to 31 January 2017. Participants A total of 269 patients, registered at 11 TB centres and private clinics, were interviewed through an interviewer-administered questionnaire. Main outcome measures Cronbach’s alpha was used to measure the internal consistency and reliability of the MOS-SSS survey instrument. Univariate and multivariable logistic regressions have been used to explore the association between care and social support, and socioeconomic factors. Result This study validated the use of the MOS-SSS among patients with TB in Pakistan. Findings of the study revealed significant differences among the socioeconomic groups of patients in each subscale of social support. Additionally, results of logistic regressions showed that patients who were older (adjusted OR=6.17, 95% CI 1.55 to 24.59, p≤0.01), male (adjusted OR=2.73, 95% CI 1.49 to 4.98, p≤0.01), widow (adjusted OR=0.17, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.80, p≤0.05), and had a larger household size (adjusted OR=5.69, 95% CI 1.32 to 24.65, p≤0.05), higher monthly income (adjusted OR=2.00, 95% CI 1.11 to 3.60, p≤0.05) and house ownership (adjusted OR=1.99, 95% CI 1.10 to 3.60, p≤0.05) were significant factors associated with the extent of care and social support that the participants received. Conclusion To cure TB, this study suggests a coordinated approach that includes not only clinical services to address this issue but also a strong social support system based on family and community necessary throughout the treatment process.