Edward Bluth

Dr. Edward Bluth


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

34Years (1993-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2012 in American Journal of Roentgenology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RMRichard H. Marshall
Richard H. Marshall
MEMarna Eissa
Marna Eissa
EBEdward Bluth
Edward Bluth
PGPaul M. Gulotta
Paul M. Gulotta
NDNancy K. Davis
Nancy K. Davis
OBJECTIVE. The hepatorenal index has been reported to be a sensitive and noninvasive test to quantify steatosis, but it is cumbersome and time-consuming and requires specialized software. The aim of this study was to improve and simplify the hepatorenal index calculation and determine whether it is an effective tool for differentiating patients with steatosis from those without steatosis, thereby eliminating the need for biopsy in a large number of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS. One hundred one patients who had undergone ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy at our institution were selected from a patient database. Patients with renal disease, patients with liver masses, and patients whose liver and right kidney were not included on the same image were excluded. Images were acquired with high-resolution ultrasound, and the hepatorenal index was calculated using freeware based on comparison of hepatic and renal brightness. RESULTS. Of the 101 patients, 63 had 5% or less steatosis and 38 had more th...

1 December 2017 in Journal of the American College of Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EBEdward Bluth
Edward Bluth
SBSwati Bansal
Swati Bansal
CBClaire E. Bender
Claire E. Bender

1 June 2015 in Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KSKaustubh Shiralkar
Kaustubh Shiralkar
SJStephen Johnson
Stephen Johnson
EBEdward Bluth
Edward Bluth
RMRichard H. Marshall
Richard H. Marshall
ADAdriana Dornelles
Adriana Dornelles
PGPaul M. Gulotta
Paul M. Gulotta

1 February 2015 in Journal of the American College of Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EBEdward Bluth
Edward Bluth
SBSwati Bansal
Swati Bansal
KMKatarzyna J. Macura
Katarzyna J. Macura
JFJulia Fielding
Julia Fielding
HTHang Truong
Hang Truong

1 September 2012 in Journal of the American College of Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EBEdward Bluth
Edward Bluth
BSBradley W. Short
Bradley W. Short
SWSusan Willis-Walton
Susan Willis-Walton

10 August 2021 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SJStephen Johnson
Stephen Johnson
DFDaniel Fort
Daniel Fort
KSKenneth Shortt
Kenneth Shortt
George TherapondosGeorge Therapondos
George Therapondos
GGGretchen E. Galliano
Gretchen E. Galliano
EBEdward Bluth
Edward Bluth
Hepatorenal index (HRI) has been shown to be an effective, noninvasive ultrasound tool to screen patients for those with or without >5% hepatic steatosis. Objective: The aim of this study was to further refine this HRI tool in order to stratify patients according to their degree of liver steatosis and give direction as to which patients should undergo random liver biopsy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 267 consecutive patients from 2015 to 2017 who had abdominal ultrasounds and a subsequent random liver biopsy within one month. The HRI was calculated and compared with the percent steatosis as assessed by histology. Results: An HRI of ≤1.17 corresponds with >95% positive predictive value of ≤5% steatosis. Between HRI values 1.18 and 1.39, performance of steatosis prediction is mixed. However, for values 1.37. An HRI of ≥1.4 corresponds with >95% positive predictive value of ≥10% steatosis. Conclusion: HRI is an accurate noninvasive tool to quantify degree of steatosis and guide who should undergo random liver biopsy, potentially significantly reducing the total number of necessary liver biopsies.