Paul Gougis

Dr. Paul Gougis

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 February 2023 in Cancer Discovery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JSJoe-Elie Salem
Joe-Elie Salem
MBMarie Bretagne
Marie Bretagne
BABaptiste Abbar
Baptiste Abbar
SLSarah Leonard-Louis
Sarah Leonard-Louis
SEStéphane Ederhy
Stéphane Ederhy
YAYves Allenbach
Yves Allenbach
Immune-checkpoint-inhibitor (ICI)–associated myotoxicity involves the heart (myocarditis) and skeletal muscles (myositis), which frequently occur concurrently and are highly fatal. We report the results of a strategy that included identification of individuals with severe ICI myocarditis by also screening for and managing concomitant respiratory muscle involvement with mechanical ventilation, as well as treatment with the CTLA4 fusion protein abatacept and the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib. Forty cases with definite ICI myocarditis were included with pathologic confirmation of concomitant myositis in the majority of patients. In the first 10 patients, using recommended guidelines, myotoxicity-related fatality occurred in 60%, consistent with historical controls. In the subsequent 30 cases, we instituted systematic screening for respiratory muscle involvement coupled with active ventilation and treatment using ruxolitinib and abatacept. The abatacept dose was adjusted using CD86 receptor occupancy on circulating monocytes. The myotoxicity-related fatality rate was 3.4% (1/30) in these 30 patients versus 60% in the first quartile (P < 0.0001). These clinical results are hypothesis-generating and need further evaluation. Significance: Early management of respiratory muscle failure using mechanical ventilation and high-dose abatacept with CD86 receptor occupancy monitoring combined with ruxolitinib may be promising to mitigate high fatality rates in severe ICI myocarditis. See related commentary by Dougan, p. 1040. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1027

1 April 2024 in JAMA Network Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PGPaul Gougis
Paul Gougis
AHAnne-Sophie Hamy
Anne-Sophie Hamy
FJFloriane Jochum
Floriane Jochum
KBKevin Bihan
Kevin Bihan
MCMarie Carbonnel
Marie Carbonnel
BABaptiste Abbar
Baptiste Abbar
Importance: With the widespread use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), concerns about their pregnancy outcomes through maternal exposure have emerged, and clinical comparative data are lacking.Objective: To assess the risk of pregnancy-, fetal-, and/or newborn-related adverse outcomes associated with exposure to ICIs compared with exposure to other anticancer agents.Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study, all reports mentioning a pregnancy-related condition and an antineoplastic agent (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification group L01) used for a cancer indication registered in the World Health Organization international pharmacovigilance database VigiBase up to June 26, 2022, were extracted.Exposure: Anticancer agents, including ICIs, used during pregnancy for a cancer indication. Immune checkpoint inhibitors included blockers of programmed cell death 1 (PD1) or its ligand (PD-L1) or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated protein 4 (CTLA4).Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was the reporting odds ratio (ROR) for maternal, fetal, or newborn complications in patients treated with ICIs vs any other anticancer drug. Adverse events, categorized into 45 individual maternofetal adverse outcomes, were directly mapped to Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities preferred terms in VigiBase.Results: A total of 3558 reports (ICI: 91 [2.6%]; other anticancer drugs: 3467 [97.4%]) were included in the analysis. In the ICI group, most reports were from the US (60 [65.9%]), and the mean (SD) patient age was 28.9 (10.2) years; in 24 of 55 reports with data on cancer type (43.6%), patients were treated for melanoma. The molecules involved in the ICI group were anti-PD1 (58 reports [63.7%]), anti-PD1 plus anti-CTLA4 (15 [16.5%]), anti-CTLA4 (13 [14.3%]), anti–PD-L1 (4 [4.4%]), and anti-PD1 plus anti–lymphocyte activation gene 3 (1 [1.1%]). An ICI was used in combination with a non-ICI anticancer agent in 10 participants (11.0%). Compared with other anticancer drugs, none of the 45 adverse outcomes identified were overreported in the group exposed to ICIs. However, preterm birth was significantly overreported for the anti-PD1 plus anti-CTLA4 combination compared with other anticancer drugs (12 of 15 [80.0%] vs 793 of 3452 [23.0%]; ROR, 13.87; 95% CI, 3.90-49.28; P < .001) but not for anti–PD-L1 or anti-CTLA4 monotherapy. Three reports of possibly immune-related maternofetal events were identified: 1 case of maternal antiphospholipid syndrome leading to spontaneous abortion, 1 case of pneumonitis leading to neonatal respiratory distress syndrome and death, and 1 case of transient congenital hypothyroidism.Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of 91 individuals exposed to ICIs during pregnancy, ICI exposure was not associated with overreporting of specific adverse pregnancy, fetal, and/or newborn outcomes compared with other anticancer treatments. However, due to possible rare immune-related neonatal adverse events, ICI use in pregnant women should be avoided when possible, especially the anti-PD1 plus anti-CTLA4 combination.

1 October 2021 in Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PGPaul Gougis
Paul Gougis
MHMarc Hilmi
Marc Hilmi
AGArthur Geraud
Arthur Geraud
OMOlivier Mir
Olivier Mir
CFChristian Funck-Brentano
Christian Funck-Brentano

12 November 2019 in JNCI Cancer Spectrum
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PGPaul Gougis
Paul Gougis
Camille Moreau-BachelardCamille Moreau-Bachelard
Camille Moreau-Bachelard
MKMaud Kamal
Maud Kamal
HGHui K Gan
Hui K Gan
EBEdith Borcoman
Edith Borcoman
Christophe Le TourneauChristophe Le Tourneau
Christophe Le Tourneau
A better understanding of cancer biology has led to the development of molecular targeted therapy, which has dramatically improved the outcome of some cancer patients, especially when a biomarker of efficacy has been used for patients’ selection. In head and neck oncology, cetuximab that targets epidermal growth factor receptor is the only targeted therapy that demonstrated a survival benefit, both in the recurrent and in the locally advanced settings, yet without prior patients’ selection. We herein review the clinical development of targeted therapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in light of the molecular landscape and give insights in on how innovative clinical trial designs may speed up biomarker discovery and deployment of new molecular targeted therapies. Given the recent approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting programmed cell death-1 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, it remains to be determined how targeted therapy will be incorporated into a global drug development strategy that will inevitably incorporate immunotherapy.

27 May 2022 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EDElise Dumas
Elise Dumas
LLLucie Laot
Lucie Laot
FCFlorence Coussy
Florence Coussy
Beatriz Grandal RejoBeatriz Grandal Rejo
Beatriz Grandal Rejo
Eric DaoudEric Daoud
Eric Daoud
AHAnne Sophie Hamy
Anne Sophie Hamy
Background: Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequent cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related death in women. The French National Cancer Institute has created a national cancer cohort to promote cancer research and improve our understanding of cancer using the National Health Data System (SNDS) and amalgamating all cancer sites. So far, no detailed separate data are available for early BC. Objectives: To describe the creation of the French Early Breast Cancer Cohort (FRESH). Methods: All French women aged 18 years or over, with early-stage BC newly diagnosed between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2017, treated by surgery, and registered in the general health insurance coverage plan were included in the cohort. Patients with suspected locoregional or distant metastases at diagnosis were excluded. BC treatments (surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, radiotherapy, and endocrine therapy), and diagnostic procedures (biopsy, cytology, and imaging) were extracted from hospital discharge reports, outpatient care notes, or pharmacy drug delivery data. The BC subtype was inferred from the treatments received. Results: We included 235,368 patients with early BC in the cohort (median age: 60 years). The BC subtype distribution was as follows: luminal (80.2%), triple-negative (TNBC, 9.5%); HER2+ (10.3%), or unidentifiable (n = 44,388, 18.9% of the cohort). Most patients underwent radiotherapy (n = 200,685, 85.3%) and endocrine therapy (n = 165,655, 70.4%), and 38.3% (n = 90,252) received chemotherapy. Treatments and care pathways are described. Conclusions: The FRESH Cohort is an unprecedented population-based resource facilitating future large-scale real-life studies aiming to improve care pathways and quality of care for BC patients.

20 February 2020 in European Respiratory Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MMMelissa Y.Y. Moey
Melissa Y.Y. Moey
PGPaul Gougis
Paul Gougis
VGVincent Goldschmidt
Vincent Goldschmidt
DJDouglas B. Johnson
Douglas B. Johnson
BLBénédicte Lebrun-Vignes
Bénédicte Lebrun-Vignes
JSJoe-Elie Salem
Joe-Elie Salem