Even before the current pandemic, university students were known to have high levels of hassles, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. In all probability, the advent of COVID-19 has substantially raised these levels. The present study measured the emotional state of university students during lockdown and identified the relevant situational and psychological factors. To this end, 1,297 French university students were assessed during lockdown, which lasted from 16 March to 11 May in France. Situational factors included the belief that lockdown was compromising their future job prospects, COVID-19 symptoms, and health concerns. Psychological factors included students’ implicit theory of emotion, and the coping strategies they used during lockdown. We explored the extent to which these factors were associated with levels of hassles, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. Results indicated that students’ belief that lockdown was compromising their future job prospects was positively related to hassles (r = .34, p < .001), while concerns about their own health and that of relatives were positively associated with anxiety (r = .37 and .34; p < .001). In addition, use of the positive reframing coping strategy mediated the effect of students’ implicit theory of emotion on their depressive symptoms. Even though the national lockdown is now over, the pandemic will continue to have a major impact on university students over the coming months. It is therefore essential for universities to provide them with adequate psychological support.

The aim of this study was to show the characteristics of stress during a highly stressful coming out compared to other stress situations. Our sample comprised 400 lesbian, gay, or bisexual (LGB) young adults ages 18–26 recruited from two French online dating sites. The results showed high stress during the coming-out process, and almost all participants experienced at least one stressful coming out. According to the transactional model of stress, the primary appraisal (risk assessment/threat) and the secondary appraisals (resources) were examined. Two specificities were present during coming out: the fear to hurt close ones and the limited resources to cope. These data show the necessity of better understanding this specific stressor and developing interventions for young French LGB people.

Background: Mothers of ADHD children often display high levels of distress. Understanding the origin of such distress in a view to reducing it is an essential part of the clinical management of ADHD children. Studies have shown that children’s symptoms are linked to mothers’ stigma and that such stigma can cause mothers’ distress. However, no study has explored the links between symptoms, stigma and distress. Aim: We tested (1) whether children’s symptoms are sources of affiliate stigma, which in turn contributes to generating mothers’ distress and (2) whether such relationship is stronger in mothers of male ADHD children. Method: 159 French mothers of an ADHD child were recruited. Four indices were used to assess mothers’ distress: anxiety, depression, self-esteem and life satisfaction. Children’s ADHD symptoms and mothers’ affiliate stigma were also measured and contrasted with distress. Results: Mothers’ distress was positively related with both affiliate stigma and children’s ADHD symptoms, but this was only true in mothers of male ADHD children. The relationship between children’s symptoms and mothers’ distress was mediated by affiliate stigma. Conclusions: Psychosocial interventions in mothers of ADHD children must integrate affiliate stigma and should be adjusted according to child’s gender.

Many studies have highlighted the impact of lockdowns on the lifestyle of university students. We do not, however, know how these lifestyles have changed over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic. The objective of the present study was to describe changes in the levels of physical activity, sedentary behaviors, and alcohol consumption in French university students during different periods of the pandemic. This cohort study was conducted between 23 April and 11 December 2020. Measurements were performed four times: Twice during two successive lockdowns and twice during the intervening period. A total of 1294 university students were initially included, and 91 students completed the four measurement points over a seven-month period. Alcohol consumption, physical activity, and sedentary behaviors were measured. The results revealed high levels of physical activity during the first lockdown, but a subsequent decline during the pandemic that was partly explained by time. The pandemic had a positive effect on alcohol consumption. Sedentary levels were higher during both lockdowns, and sedentary behaviors tended to persist over time. This study raises concerns about the long-term effects of the pandemic on students’ health and lifestyle. The preponderance of distance learning should be reconsidered, given the negative impact of physical inactivity and sedentary behavior on long-term health, especially in young adults.

Background: Digital interventions offer vital support for patients with cancer through education, behavior change, and monitoring. Despite their potential, patient adherence to and engagement with these self-help interventions is challenging. Factors like user characteristics, technology, and intervention design influence adherence and engagement. Existing reviews have gaps in exploring diverse factors associated with adherence in cancer care. Objective: This systematic review aims to identify factors influencing adherence to and engagement with digital interventions with self-help components in cancer care. It examined sociodemographic, psychosocial, health-related, and intervention-related factors that affect patients’ adherence to and engagement with these digital health solutions. Methods: Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO to find studies published from January 2010 to September 2021. The studies included in this review focused on adult patients with cancer using digital interventions with self-help features. Data were extracted and synthesized using a standardized approach. Factors associated with adherence were synthesized according to their type—sociodemographic factors, psychosocial factors, health-related factors, technology-related factors, and intervention-related factors. Results: Among 9386 studies initially screened, 61 (0.6%) were eligible for analysis. These studies covered diverse eHealth intervention types, cancer types, and outcome measures. Investigating the determinants of adherence to and engagement with digital interventions was the main objective for 43% (26/61) of the included studies. Adherence and engagement were gauged using varied measures, such as dropout rates, log-ins, and self-reported measures. Results regarding factors associated with adherence and engagement were inconsistent across studies. Most sociodemographic (eg, age) and health-related factors (eg, cancer stage) yielded mixed outcomes. However, comorbidity consistently predicted lower adherence and engagement. Results regarding psychosocial factors were more stable across studies. Specifically, higher social support was associated with lower adherence and engagement. Finally, intervention-related factors like intervention type or human support showed conflicting results. Adopting an intersectional perspective revealed that specificities vary according to intervention goals and the operationalization of adherence versus engagement, with women being more adherent and engaged than men in interventions targeting distress. When focusing on adherence rather than engagement, older patients were more adherent than younger patients. Conclusions: This review highlights the complexity of adherence to and engagement with digital interventions in cancer care. While some factors, notably comorbidities and low social support, were consistently linked to adherence and engagement, others displayed mixed associations. The review underscores the need for standardizing measures, investigating specific intervention features, and enhancing study quality to optimize digital interventions for patients with cancer. Further research is crucial to better understand and improve adherence to digital health solutions in cancer care. Trial Registration: PROSPERO CRD42021281028; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=281028