Hanna M. Seidling

Prof. Dr. Hanna M. Seidling

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2013 in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJamie J Coleman
Jamie J Coleman
HSHeleen van der Sijs
Heleen van der Sijs
WHWalter E Haefeli
Walter E Haefeli
SSSarah P Slight
Sarah P Slight
SMSarah E McDowell
Sarah E McDowell
ASAnn Slee
Ann Slee
Clinical decision support (CDS) for electronic prescribing systems (computerized physician order entry) should help prescribers in the safe and rational use of medicines. However, the best ways to alert users to unsafe or irrational prescribing are uncertain. Specifically, CDS systems may generate too many alerts, producing unwelcome distractions for prescribers, or too few alerts running the risk of overlooking possible harms. Obtaining the right balance of alerting to adequately improve patient safety should be a priority.

1 November 2018 in Patient Preference and Adherence
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMarcel Kp Kusch
Marcel Kp Kusch
WHWalter E. Haefeli
Walter E. Haefeli
HSHanna M. Seidling
Hanna M. Seidling
Purpose: The aim of this study was to 1) describe drug information desired by patients and 2) analyze how such information could be customized to be presented to patients according to their individual information needs. Materials and methods: We performed a scoping literature search and identified relevant drug information topics by assessing and clustering 1) studies analyzing patients’ enquiries to drug information hotlines and services, and 2) qualitative studies evaluating patient drug information needs. For the two most frequently mentioned topics, we further analyzed which components (ie, information domains) the topics contained and examined patients’ and health care professionals’ (HCPs) views on these components. Results: Of 27 identified drug information topics in the literature search, patients most frequently requested information on adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and drug–drug interactions (DDIs). Hypothetically, those topics are composed of seven distinct information domains each (eg, ADR and DDI classification by frequency, severity, or onset; information on management strategies, monitoring, and prevention strategies). Patients’ and HCPs’ appraisal concerning the information content of these domains varies greatly and is even lacking sometimes. Conclusion: Patients particularly request information on ADRs and DDIs. Approaches to customize such information are sparse. The identified information domains of each topic could be used to structure corresponding drug information and to thus facilitate customization to individual information needs.

8 September 2015 in European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TMTanja Mayer
Tanja Mayer
WHWalter E Haefeli
Walter E Haefeli
HSHanna M. Seidling
Hanna M. Seidling

17 March 2017 in International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MWMarina Weissenborn
Marina Weissenborn
WHWalter E. Haefeli
Walter E. Haefeli
FPFrank Peters-Klimm
Frank Peters-Klimm
HSHanna M. Seidling
Hanna M. Seidling

1 April 2020 in European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSteffen J. Schmidt
Steffen J. Schmidt
VWViktoria S. Wurmbach
Viktoria S. Wurmbach
ALAnette Lampert
Anette Lampert
SBSimone Bernard
Simone Bernard
WHWalter E. Haefeli
Walter E. Haefeli
PTPetra A. Thürmann
Petra A. Thürmann
Purpose: Complexity of drug treatment is known to be a risk factor for administration errors and nonadherence promoting higher healthcare costs, hospital admissions and increased mortality. Number of drugs and dose frequency are parameters often used to assess complexity related to the medication regimen. However, factors resulting from complex processes of care or arising from patient characteristics are only sporadically analyzed. Hence, the objective of this review is to give a comprehensive overview of relevant, patient-centered factors influencing complexity of drug treatment. Methods: A purposeful literature search was performed in MEDLINE to identify potential complexity factors relating to the prescribed drug (i.e. dosage forms or other product characteristics), the specific medication regimen (i.e. dosage schemes or additional instructions), specific patient characteristics and process characteristics. Factors were included if they were associated to administration errors, nonadherence and related adverse drug events detected in community dwelling adult patients. Results: Ninety-one influencing factors were identified: fourteen in “dosage forms”, five in “product characteristics”, twelve in “dosage schemes”, nine in “additional instructions”, thirty-one in “patient characteristics” and twenty in “process characteristics”. Conclusions: Although the findings are limited by the non-systematic search process and the heterogeneous results, the search shows the influence of many factors on the complexity of drug treatment. However, to evaluate their relevance for individual patients, prospective studies are necessary.

1 November 2017 in Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HSHanna M. Seidling
Hanna M. Seidling
ASAlexander Francesco Josef Send
Alexander Francesco Josef Send
JBJanina Bittmann
Janina Bittmann
KRKatja Renner
Katja Renner
BDBernd Dewald
Bernd Dewald
WHWalter Emil Haefeli
Walter Emil Haefeli