Background: Cerebral venous sinus or vein thromboses (SVT) are treated with heparin followed by oral anticoagulation. Even after receiving the best medical treatment, numerous patients experience neurological deterioration, intracerebral hemorrhage or brain edema. Debate regarding whether endovascular treatment (EVT) is beneficial in such severe cases remains ongoing. This systematic review summarizes the current evidence supporting the use of EVT for SVT on the basis of case presentations, with a focus on patient selection, treatment strategies and the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This systemic literature review included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective observational data analyzing five or more patients. Follow-up information (modified Rankin scale (mRS)) was required to be provided (individual patient data). Results: 21 records (n = 405 patients; 1 RCT, 20 observational studies) were identified. EVT was found to be feasible and safe in a highly selected patient cohort but was not associated with an increase in good functional outcomes (mRS 0–2) in RCT data. In observational data, good functional outcomes were frequently observed despite an anticipated poor prognosis. Conclusion: The current evidence does not support the routine incorporation of EVT in SVT treatment. However, in a patient cohort prone to poor prognosis, EVT might be a reasonable therapeutic option. Further studies determining the patients at risk, choice of methods and devices, and timing of treatment initiation are warranted.

Introduction: This study aimed to report the safety and efficacy of off-label intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with alteplase after sequentially liberalizing our institutional guidelines allowing IVT for patients under direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) regardless of plasma levels, time of last intake, and without prior anticoagulation reversal therapy. Patients and methods: We utilized the target-trial methodology to emulate hypothetical criteria of a randomized controlled trial in our prospective stroke registry. Consecutive DOAC patients (06/2021–11/2023) otherwise qualifying for IVT were included. Safety and efficacy outcomes (symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage [ICH], any radiological ICH, major bleeding, 90-day mortality, 90-day good functional outcome [mRS 0–2 or return to baseline]) were assessed using inverse-probability-weighted regression-adjustment comparing patients with versus without IVT. Results: Ninety eight patients fulfilled the target-trial criteria. IVT was given in 49/98 (50%) patients at a median of 178 (interquartile range 134–285) min after symptom onset with median DOAC plasma level of 77 ng/ml (15 patients had plasma levels > 100 ng/ml; 25/49 [51%] were treated within 12 h after last DOAC ingestion). Endovascular therapy was more frequent in patients without IVT (73% vs 33%). Symptomatic ICH occurred in 0/49 patients receiving IVT and 2/49 patients without IVT (adjusted difference −2.5%; 95% CI −5.9 to 0.8). The rates of any radiological ICH were comparable. Patients receiving IVT were more likely to have good functional outcomes. Discussion and conclusion: After liberalizing our approach for IVT regardless of recent DOAC intake, we did not experience any safety concerns. The association of IVT with better functional outcomes warrants prospective randomized controlled trials.

Background: Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) and reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) may cause ischaemic stroke and intracranial haemorrhage. The aim of our study was to assess the frequency of the afore‐mentioned outcomes.Methods: We performed a PROSPERO‐registered (CRD42022355704) systematic review and meta‐analysis accessing PubMed until 7 November 2022. The inclusion criteria were: (1) original publication, (2) adult patients (≥18 years), (3) enrolling patients with PRES and/or RCVS, (4) English language and (5) outcome information. Outcomes were frequency of (1) ischaemic stroke and (2) intracranial haemorrhage, divided into subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) and intraparenchymal haemorrhage (IPH). The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used.Results: We identified 848 studies and included 48 relevant studies after reviewing titles, abstracts and full text. We found 11 studies on RCVS (unselected patients), reporting on 2746 patients. Among the patients analysed, 15.9% (95% CI 9.6%–23.4%) had ischaemic stroke and 22.1% (95% CI 10%–39.6%) had intracranial haemorrhage. A further 20.3% (95% CI 11.2%–31.2%) had SAH and 6.7% (95% CI 3.6%–10.7%) had IPH. Furthermore, we found 28 studies on PRES (unselected patients), reporting on 1385 patients. Among the patients analysed, 11.2% (95% CI 7.9%–15%) had ischaemic stroke and 16.1% (95% CI 12.3%–20.3%) had intracranial haemorrhage. Further, 7% (95% CI 4.7%–9.9%) had SAH and 9.7% (95% CI 5.4%–15%) had IPH.Conclusions: Intracranial haemorrhage and ischaemic stroke are common outcomes in PRES and RCVS. The frequency reported in the individual studies varied considerably.

Background and Purpose: Various endovascular approaches to treat acute ischemic stroke caused by extra- intracranial tandem occlusions (TO) exist: percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with or without emergent extracranial carotid stenting (ECS) due to high-grade stenosis preceded or followed by intracranial mechanical and/or aspiration thrombectomy (MT). Which treatment strategy to use is still a matter of debate. Methods: From our ongoing prospective stroke registry we retrospectively analyzed 1,071 patients with anterior circulation stroke getting endovascular treatment within 6 h of symptom onset. ECS prior to intracranial MT for TO (n = 222) was compared to MT as standard of care (control group; acute intracranial vessel occlusion without concomitant ipsilateral ICA-occlusion or high-grade stenosis [C; n = 849]). Good functional outcome (mRS ≤ 2 at 3 months), mortality rates, frequencies of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and successful recanalization (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction Score [TICI] 2b or 3) were assessed. In subgroup analyses we tried to detect possible influences of stroke etiology, dual inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA; clopidogrel [CLO]: n = 83; ticagrelor [TIC]: n = 137; in combination with Aspirin) and intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). Results: Functional outcome was superior in TO (mRS 0–2: 44.6%) when compared with controls (36.0%; OR [95% CI]: 3.49 [1.59–7.67]; p = 0.002). There was no difference in all-cause mortality at 3 months (TO: 21.6%; C: 27.7%; 0.78 [0.47–1.29]; p = 0.324), in-hospital mortality (0.76 [0.45–1.30]; p = 0.324), sICH (TO: 3.2%; C: 5.0%; 0.70 [0.30–1.59]; p = 0.389), and TICI 2b/3 (TO: 89.1%; C: 88.3%; p = 0.813). In subgroup-analysis, TIC and CLO did not differ in functional outcome (TIC: 45.3%; CLO: 44.6%; 1.04 [0.51–2.09]; p = 0.920) and mortality rates (all-cause mortality: TIC: 23.4%; CLO: 16.9%; 0.75 [0.27–2.13]; p = 0.594). sICH was more frequent in TIC (n = 7 [5.1%]) vs. CLO (n = 0; p = 0.048). Conclusion: In our pre-selected cohort, ECS prior to intracranial MT in TO allowed for a good functional outcome that was superior compared to a control population. Mortality rates did not differ. Despite a dual IPA in TO, there was no increase in sICH. CLO and TIC for dual IPA did not differ in terms out outcome and mortality rates. A significant increase in sICH was observed after initial loading with TIC.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke within 6 hours of symptom onset is effective and safe. However, in many patients, information on the beginning of symptoms is not available. Patients can be divided into those with wake-up stroke and daytime-unwitnessed stroke. Evidence on outcome and complications after mechanical thrombectomy in wake-up stroke and daytime-unwitnessed stroke is rare. A potential beneficial effect of mechanical thrombectomy in selected patients with wake-up stroke or daytime-unwitnessed stroke is suspected. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 1073 patients with anterior circulation stroke undergoing mechanical thrombectomy between 2010 and 2016. Patients with wake-up stroke and daytime-unwitnessed stroke were compared with controls receiving mechanical thrombectomy as the standard of care. We assessed good functional outcome (mRS ≤ 2 at 3 months), mortality rates, and frequencies of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Subgroup analyses tried to detect influences of patient selection via further imaging modalities (MR imaging, CTP; wake-up stroke [advanced], daytime-unwitnessed stroke [advanced]) on outcome and safety. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in good functional outcome between patients with wake-up stroke and controls (35.9% versus 38.3%, P = .625). Outcome in patients with daytime-unwitnessed stroke was inferior compared with controls (27.3%, P = .007). Groups did not differ in all-cause mortality at day 90 (P = .224) and the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (P = .292). Advanced imaging improved the frequency of good functional outcome (non-wake-up stroke [advanced] versus wake-up stroke [advanced]: OR, 2.92; 95% CI, 1.32–6.45; non-daytime-unwitnessed stroke [advanced] versus daytime-unwitnessed stroke [advanced]: OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.03–4.25) with an additional reduction in all-cause mortality (non-daytime-unwitnessed stroke [advanced] versus daytime-unwitnessed stroke [advanced]: OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.20–0.88). CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical thrombectomy in selected patients with wake-up stroke allows a good functional outcome comparable with that of controls. Outcome after mechanical thrombectomy in daytime-unwitnessed stroke seems to be inferior compared with that in controls. Advanced imaging modalities may increase the frequency of good functional outcome in both patients with wake-up stroke and daytime-unwitnessed stroke.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients with recent ingestion of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is a frequent challenge and remains controversial. The benefit of DOAC reversal before IVT is uncertain. METHODS: Using target trial methodology, we analyzed data from 28 comprehensive stroke centers. Patients on DOACs were included if they met IVT criteria, had a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of ≥2, and last DOAC intake within 48 hours or was undeterminable. Safety and efficacy outcomes (symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, any intracerebral hemorrhage, major bleeding, 90-day mortality, and good functional outcome [modified Rankin Scale score of 0–2 or return to baseline]) were compared between those receiving IVT versus no IVT and IVT with versus without reversal. In addition, a comparison was made with patients from the New Zealand stroke registry, all of whom underwent reversal with idarucizumab. We adjusted for covariates known to be associated with safety and efficacy outcomes, including age, stroke severity, intended thrombectomy, blood glucose, blood pressure, DOAC reversal, and time from last intake. RESULTS: Overall, 1342 patients fulfilled the target trial criteria. The median age was 80 (interquartile range, 73–86) years, median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 11, 50% were female, and 52% of patients received endovascular therapy. IVT was given in 342 of 1342 (25%) patients. Of these, 141 (41.2%) had verified DOAC intake <12 hours before admission, and 92 (26.9%) within 12 to 24 hours. Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage occurred in 10 of 328 (3.0%) of patients receiving IVT and 54 of 921 (5.9%) patients not receiving IVT (adjusted difference, −2.1% [95% CI, −5.3% to +1.2]). Patients receiving IVT were more likely to have good functional outcomes (adjusted difference, +14.4% [95% CI, +7.1% to +21.8%]). Comparing 289 patients with reversal (from the additional New Zealand registry) and 283 patients without reversal before IVT (from the target trial population), there was no significant difference in symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, major bleeding, or efficacy outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This target trial confirms previous observational data regarding the safety of off-label IVT in patients with recent DOAC intake. More data and dedicated trials are needed for patients with confirmed high DOAC plasma levels and regarding the efficacy and safety of DOAC reversal before IVT.