Guodong Zou

Mr. Guodong Zou


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 July 2022 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WZWeiyao Zhu
Weiyao Zhu
GZGuodong Zou
Guodong Zou
YLYuwei Liu
Yuwei Liu
Wenchao LiuWenchao Liu
Wenchao Liu
Bin PanBin Pan
Bin Pan
Threshold pressure gradient (TPG) is a key parameter determining the pore-scale fluid dynamics. In tight gas reservoirs, both gas and water exist in the porous rock, and the existing water can be divided into irreducible and movable water. However, how movable water saturation will influence TPG has not yet been investigated. Therefore herein, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and high-pressure mercury intrusion (HPMI) experiments were performed to determine pore-scale water distribution, movable water saturation, and pore throat distribution in the core plugs. Subsequently, the air bubble method was used to measure TPG as a function of movable water saturation and permeability inside tight gas core plugs, finding that TPG increased from 0.01 MPa/m to 0.25 MPa/m with the movable saturation increased from 2% to 35%. Finally, a semi-empirical model was derived to describe the correlation between TPG, movable water saturation, and permeability, which performed better than previous models in the literature. These insights will advance the fundamental understanding of TPG in tight gas reservoirs and provide useful guidance on tight gas reservoirs development.

21 March 2023 in Polymers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GZGuodong Zou
Guodong Zou
Bin PanBin Pan
Bin Pan
WZWeiyao Zhu
Weiyao Zhu
YLYuwei Liu
Yuwei Liu
SMShou Ma
Shou Ma
MLMingming Liu
Mingming Liu
Fracturing fluids are widely applied in the hydraulic fracturing of shale gas reservoirs, but the fracturing fluid flowback efficiency is typically less than 50%, severely limiting the shale gas recovery. Additionally, the mechanism and main influencing factors of fracturing fluid flowback are unclear. In this study, microscopic experiments are conducted to simulate the fracturing fluid flowback progress in shale gas reservoirs. The mechanism and factors affecting fracturing fluid flowback/retention in the fracture zone were analyzed and clarified. Results show that the ultimate flowback efficiency of fracturing fluid is positively correlated with the fracturing fluid concentration and the gas driving pressure difference. There are four kinds of mechanisms responsible for fracturing fluid retention in the pore network: viscous resistance, the Jamin effect, the gas blockage effect and the dead end of the pore. Additionally, the ultimate flowback efficiency of the fracturing fluid increases linearly with increasing capillary number. These insights will advance the fundamental understanding of fracturing fluid flowback in shale gas reservoirs and provide useful guidance for shale gas reservoirs development.

15 July 2024 in Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RYRenfeng Yang
Renfeng Yang
LZLijun Zhang
Lijun Zhang
XTXianhong Tan
Xianhong Tan
XTXiaofeng Tian
Xiaofeng Tian
XYXugang Yang
Xugang Yang
SHShaobin Hu
Shaobin Hu
Mechanism analysis and technical scheme optimization on CO2 displacement and CO2 storage are based on the high-pressure physical properties of CO2-added formation oil. Oil and natural gas samples from the BZ25-1 block in the Bohai oilfield were used to conduct high-pressure physical property experiments to explore the impacts of CO2-CH4 mixed gas on the properties of formation oil. After injecting different amounts of mixed gas, the saturated pressure was measured by constant mass expansion test, the viscosity was measured by falling ball method, the expansion coefficient was measured by gas injection expansion test, and the gas–oil ratio and volume coefficient were obtained by single degassing test. The results show that with gas injection, the saturation pressure and dissolved gas–oil ratio of formation oil increase, the volume coefficient and expansion factor go up, while the oil viscosity reduces. With the increase in gas addition, the properties of formation oil continue to improve, but the increase in improvement becomes flat. With the increase in pressure, the amount of dissolved gas in the formation oil will also increase. High-purity CO2 is more helpful to change the properties of formation oil, while the gas mixed with CH4 is more beneficial to elevate the formation energy. For the BZ 25-1 block, the gas injection amount of about 80 mol% is appropriate and the CO2 purity of 60% can well balance the oil properties improvement and the formation pressure elevation.