Edoardo Gioele Spinelli

Dr. Edoardo Gioele Spinelli

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 January 2017 in Annals of Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ESEdoardo Gioele Spinelli
Edoardo Gioele Spinelli
MMMaria Luisa Mandelli
Maria Luisa Mandelli
ZMZachary A. Miller
Zachary A. Miller
MSMiguel A Santos‐Santos
Miguel A Santos‐Santos
SWStephen M. Wilson
Stephen M. Wilson
MGMaria Luisa Gorno‐Tempini
Maria Luisa Gorno‐Tempini

1 August 2014 in Annals of Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FAFederica Agosta
Federica Agosta
DLDacia Dalla Libera
Dacia Dalla Libera
ESEdoardo Gioele Spinelli
Edoardo Gioele Spinelli
AFAnnamaria Finardi
Annamaria Finardi
ECElisa Canu
Elisa Canu
RFRoberto Furlan
Roberto Furlan

1 March 2018 in JAMA Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMiguel A. Santos-Santos
Miguel A. Santos-Santos
GRGil D. Rabinovici
Gil D. Rabinovici
LILeonardo Iaccarino
Leonardo Iaccarino
NANagehan Ayakta
Nagehan Ayakta
GTGautam Tammewar
Gautam Tammewar
MGMaria Luisa Gorno-Tempini
Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini
Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a clinically and pathologically heterogeneous condition in which language impairment is the predominant cause of functional impairment during the initial phases of disease.1 In 2011, an international consortium of investigators established a classification scheme for the 3 most common variants: the semantic (svPPA), nonfluent/agrammatic (nfvPPA), and logopenic (lvPPA) variants of PPA.2 Classification may occur at 1 of 3 levels: clinical, imaging-supported, or definite pathologic diagnosis. These guidelines reflected the accumulated knowledge of the patterns of speech and language dysfunction, brain atrophy, and underlying pathology typically associated with each clinical variant and represent a collective effort to increase comparability between studies and eventually improve the ability to predict the underlying pathology.

2 February 2016 in Human Brain Mapping
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FAFederica Agosta
Federica Agosta
Pilar M. FerraroPilar M. Ferraro
Pilar M. Ferraro
NRNilo Riva
Nilo Riva
ESEdoardo Gioele Spinelli
Edoardo Gioele Spinelli
ACAdriano Chiò
Adriano Chiò
Massimo FilippiMassimo Filippi
Massimo Filippi

9 October 2012 in Journal of Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Massimo FilippiMassimo Filippi
Massimo Filippi
FAFederica Agosta
Federica Agosta
ESEdoardo Gioele Spinelli
Edoardo Gioele Spinelli
MRMaria Assunta Rocca
Maria Assunta Rocca

1 January 2017 in NeuroImage: Clinical
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Pilar M. FerraroPilar M. Ferraro
Pilar M. Ferraro
FAFederica Agosta
Federica Agosta
NRNilo Riva
Nilo Riva
MCMassimiliano Copetti
Massimiliano Copetti
ESEdoardo Gioele Spinelli
Edoardo Gioele Spinelli
Massimo FilippiMassimo Filippi
Massimo Filippi
This prospective study developed an MRI-based method for identification of individual motor neuron disease (MND) patients and test its accuracy at the individual patient level in an independent sample compared with mimic disorders. 123 patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), 44 patients with predominantly upper motor neuron disease (PUMN), 20 patients with ALS-mimic disorders, and 78 healthy controls were studied. The diagnostic accuracy of precentral cortical thickness and diffusion tensor (DT) MRI metrics of corticospinal and motor callosal tracts were assessed in a training cohort and externally proved in a validation cohort using a random forest analysis. In the training set, precentral cortical thickness showed 0.86 and 0.89 accuracy in differentiating ALS and PUMN patients from controls, while DT MRI distinguished the two groups from controls with 0.78 and 0.92 accuracy. In ALS vs controls, the combination of cortical thickness and DT MRI metrics (combined model) improved the classification pattern (0.91 accuracy). In the validation cohort, the best accuracy was reached by DT MRI (0.87 and 0.95 accuracy in ALS and PUMN vs mimic disorders). The combined model distinguished ALS and PUMN patients from mimic syndromes with 0.87 and 0.94 accuracy. A multimodal MRI approach that incorporates motor cortical and white matter alterations yields statistically significant improvement in accuracy over using each modality separately in the individual MND patient classification. DT MRI represents the most powerful tool to distinguish MND from mimic disorders.