Tomohiro Egusa

Dr. Tomohiro Egusa

Shizuoka University, Shizuoka, Japan
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 May 2012 in Ecology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TSTakuya Sato
Takuya Sato
TETomohiro Egusa
Tomohiro Egusa
KFKeitaro Fukushima
Keitaro Fukushima
TOTomoki Oda
Tomoki Oda
NONobuhito Ohte
Nobuhito Ohte
KLKevin D. Lafferty
Kevin D. Lafferty

12 May 2020 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TETomohiro Egusa
Tomohiro Egusa
TKTomo’omi Kumagai
Tomo’omi Kumagai
NSNorihiko Shiraishi
Norihiko Shiraishi
An accurate estimate of total forest carbon (C) stock and C uptake is crucial for predicting global warming scenarios and planning CO2emission reductions. Forest inventory, based on field measurements of individual tree sizes, is considered the most accurate estimation method for forest C stock. Japan’s national forest inventory (NFI) provides stand-scale stem volume for the entire forested area based on (1) direct field measurements (m-NFI) and (2) prediction using yield tables (p-NFI). Here, we show that Japanese national and local forestry agencies and some research studies have used p-NFI and greatly underestimated the Japanese forest C stock (58–64%) and net annual C uptake (41–48%). This was because approximately 10% of the forest area was not counted in p-NFI and because the yield tables in p-NFI, which were constructed around 1970, were outdated. For accurate estimation of the forest C stock, yield tables used in p-NFI should be reconstructed or ideally field measurement campaigns for m-NFI should be continued. In the future, appropriate forest management plans are necessary to effectively use the high CO2absorption capacity of Japanese forests and these should be compared with other industries’ CO2reduction plans from a cost-benefit perspective.

21 June 2023 in Journal of Hydrology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HMHiroki Momiyama
Hiroki Momiyama
TKTomo'OMi Kumagai
Tomo'OMi Kumagai
NFNaoya Fujime
Naoya Fujime
TETomohiro Egusa
Tomohiro Egusa
TSTakanori Shimizu
Takanori Shimizu

18 April 2021 in Hydrological Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TOTomoki Oda
Tomoki Oda
TETomohiro Egusa
Tomohiro Egusa
NONobuhito Ohte
Nobuhito Ohte
NHNorifumi Hotta
Norifumi Hotta
NTNobuaki Tanaka
Nobuaki Tanaka
MSMasakazu Suzuki
Masakazu Suzuki

30 August 2019 in Water Resources Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TETomohiro Egusa
Tomohiro Egusa
TKTomo'OMi Kumagai
Tomo'OMi Kumagai
TOTomoki Oda
Tomoki Oda
TGTakashi Gomi
Takashi Gomi
NONobuhito Ohte
Nobuhito Ohte
Understanding how spatial variability in stream discharge and water chemistry decrease with increasing catchment area is required to improve our ability to predict hydrological and biogeochemical processes in ungauged basins. We investigated differences in this decrease of variability with increasing catchment area among catchments and among specific discharge (Qs) and water chemistry parameters. We defined the slope of the decrease in the variability with increasing catchment area as the rate of decrease in the standard deviation and coefficient of variation (δSD and δCV, respectively), both of which are −0.5 for the simple mixing of random variables (random mixing). All δSD and δCV values of Qs were less than −0.5, while those of most water chemistry values were greater than −0.5, indicating that with increased catchment area the spatial variability of Qs decreased more steeply than for random mixing, while for water chemistry they decreased less steeply. δSD and δCV had linear relationships with both the spatial dissimilarity index and relative changes in parameters' mean values with increasing catchment area. It suggested that differences in δSD or δCV for Qs and water chemistry can be explained by the different spatial structures, where dissimilar values of Qs and similar values of water chemistry, respectively, are located close together in space. Differences in δSD and δCV according to Qs and water chemistry should significantly affect the determination of representative elementary area and therefore need to be considered when predicting representative elementary area from spatial variability of low‐order streams.

12 May 2016 in Hydrological Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TETomohiro Egusa
Tomohiro Egusa
NONobuhito Ohte
Nobuhito Ohte
TOTomoki Oda
Tomoki Oda
MSMasakazu Suzuki
Masakazu Suzuki