CONTEXT: A common reproach precluding the use of osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) in pediatrics is a lack of evidence regarding its safety, feasibility, and effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic, scoping review of pediatric osteopathic medicine to identify gaps in the literature and make recommendations for future research. DATA SOURCES: We searched 10 databases using 6 key words and medical subject heading terms for any primary articles reporting OMM use in children published from database inception until initiation of the study. STUDY SELECTION: Articles were selected if they reported primary data on OMM conducted in the United States on patient(s) 0 to 18 years old. DATA EXTRACTION: Baseline study characteristics were collected from each article and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations system was used to critically appraise each study. RESULTS: Database search yielded 315 unique articles with 30 studies fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of these, 13 reported the data required to demonstrate statistically significant results, and no significant adverse events were reported. The majority of studies were graded as providing weak clinical evidence because of significant methodologic flaws and biases. LIMITATIONS: The review was limited to US-based studies and reports. Minimal discrepancies between reviewers were resolved via an objective third reviewer. CONCLUSIONS: There is little strong, scientific, evidence-based literature demonstrating the therapeutic benefit of OMM for pediatric care. No strong clinical recommendations can be made, but it can be medically tolerated given its low risk profile. High-quality, scientifically rigorous OMM research is required to evaluate safety, feasibility, and efficacy in pediatrics.

Treatment options for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) have increased in the era of targeted therapies such as brentuximab vedotin (BV) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors. However, there is no standard treatment and published data evaluating their use are limited. The goal of this retrospective study was to describe current real-world treatment and outcomes of pediatric, adolescent, and young adult patients with R/R ALK-positive ALCL. We conducted a retrospective, multi-institutional study identifying 81 patients with R/R ALK-positive ALCL aged ≤21 years at initial diagnosis treated between 2011 and 2022 across 18 institutions. Median time from diagnosis to relapse was 8.9 months (range, 2.6-131.9). Initial reinduction regimens included ALK-inhibitor monotherapy (n = 37, 46%), BV monotherapy (n = 19, 23%), chemotherapy without targeted therapy (n = 12, 15%), chemotherapy with targeted therapy (n = 9, 11%), or vinblastine monotherapy (n = 4, 5%), with 83% of patients achieving a complete response to initial reinduction regimen. Fifty-eight patients received a hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), 11 autologous and 48 allogeneic, with 1 receiving both. Duration of treatment for patients receiving BV or the ALK-inhibitor crizotinib (CZ) varied widely (BV, 1-11 years; CZ, 2-10 years). Five-year event-free survival was 63% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53-75) and 5-year overall survival was 91% (95% CI, 84-98). This is, to our knowledge, the largest collection of patients with R/R ALK-positive ALCL treated in the era of targeted therapy. Patients achieved excellent responses to ALK-inhibitor or BV monotherapy, but questions remain about duration of therapy and role of HSCT.

PURPOSE: The optimal management of fever without severe neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] ≥500/µL) in pediatric patients with cancer is undefined. The previously proposed Esbenshade Vanderbilt (EsVan) models accurately predict bacterial bloodstream infections (BSIs) in this population and provide risk stratification to aid management, but have lacked prospective external validation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Episodes of fever with a central venous catheter and ANC ≥500/µL occurring in pediatric patients with cancer were prospectively collected from 18 academic medical centers. Variables included in the EsVan models and 7-day clinical outcomes were collected. Five versions of the EsVan models were applied to the data with calculation of C-statistics for both overall BSI rate and high-risk organism BSI (gram-negative and Staphylococcus aureus BSI), as well as model calibration. RESULTS: In 2,565 evaluable episodes, the BSI rate was 4.7% (N = 120). Complications for the whole cohort were rare, with 1.1% (N = 27) needing intensive care unit (ICU) care by 7 days, and the all-cause mortality rate was 0.2% (N = 5), with only one potential infection-related death. C-statistics ranged from 0.775 to 0.789 for predicting overall BSI, with improved accuracy in predicting high-risk organism BSI (C-statistic 0.800-0.819). Initial empiric antibiotics were withheld in 14.9% of episodes, with no deaths or ICU admissions attributable to not receiving empiric antibiotics. CONCLUSION: The EsVan models, especially EsVan2b, perform very well prospectively across multiple academic medical centers and accurately stratify risk of BSI in episodes of non-neutropenic fever in pediatric patients with cancer. Implementation of routine screening with risk-stratified management for non-neutropenic fever in pediatric patients with cancer could safely reduce unnecessary antibiotic use.

Purpose: Medication adherence research involving adolescent and young adult (AYA) oncology patients has consisted of small, retrospective studies demonstrating poor adherence rates. Technology plays an active role in attempt to improve medication adherence. There is a growing body of literature investigating the role of smartphone applications (apps). We hypothesized a medication phone app, MedActionPlan Pro (MPP), leads to perceived improvement in medication adherence. Methods: Thirty AYA oncology patients actively receiving treatment (AYA defined as 15–30 years) at Nationwide Children's Hospital were enrolled. Participants downloaded the MPP app on their smartphone for 3 months, during which time participants were provided text messages and alerts to encourage medication adherence. Post-app use, participants completed semi-structured interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and independently coded to determine consensus thematic content. Results: Thirty AYA oncology participants (16 male), median age 17.5 (range: 15–30 years), participated in the study, with 22 participants (55% male) with a median age of 18 years (range: 15–30 years) participated in the final qualitative survey interview. Participants reported positive views about app utilization and perceived improved medication adherence. Additional themes included perceived decreased forgetfulness, improved organization, and identified customization for medications within the app was most important to AYAs. Conclusion: AYA oncology patients reported improvement in perceived medication adherence utilizing MPP and identified several features they thought would lead to improved medication adherence. These findings, integrated with previous literature, support the further need to investigate the utility of medication adherence apps that fit the unique needs of AYA oncology patients.