The missions of modern aircraft require multiple abilities, such as highly efficient taking-off and landing, fast arrival, and long-endurance hovering. It is difficult to achieve all technical objectives using traditional aircraft design technology. The active flow control technology using the concept of a co-flow jet (CFJ) is a flow control method without a mass source that does not require air from the engine. It has strong flow control ability in low-speed flow, can greatly improve the stall angle of the aircraft, and can obtain large lift enhancement. At transonic conditions, it can lead to a larger lift–drag ratio with a small expense. CFJ technology has great application potential for aircraft due to its flexible control strategy and remarkable control effect. In this paper, the concept of a combination of CFJ and variable camber technology is proposed which realizes the change of airfoil camber to meet different task requirements with the movable droop head. By using the built-in ducted fan, air is blown and sucked in the jet channel so as to realize CFJ flow control. In a state of high-speed flight, complete geometric restoration is achieved by closing the channel and retracting the droop head. In this paper, the design and aerodynamic analysis of a CFJ device with variable camber based on a supercritical airfoil with small camber and a small leading-edge radius are carried out using the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method. Comparative studies are conducted for different schemes on the taking off and landing performances, and discussions are had on core technical parameters such as power consumption. The results indicate that by utilizing the CFJ technology with more than 10 degrees of droop device, the maximum lift coefficient of a supercritical airfoil with a small camber and leading-edge radius, which is suitable for transonic flight, can be increased to a value larger than 4.0.

The uncertainty of the turbulence/transition model is a problem with relatively high attention in the CFD area. Wall distance is an important physical parameter in turbulence/transition modeling, and its accuracy has a large effect on numerical simulation results. As most CFD solvers use the solving strategy to calculate the nearest distance to the wall based on mesh topology, this makes wall distance one important source of the uncertainty of the simulation results. To investigate the role of wall distance in turbulence/transition simulations, we have conducted simulations for various aerodynamic shapes, such as the plate with zero pressure gradient (ZPG), RAE2822 supercritical airfoil and ONERA M6 transonic wing. Further, the prediction abilities on turbulence/transition and shock wave phenomena of several physical models, including SA, SST and Wilcox-k-ω turbulence models as well as the γ-Re_θt-SST transition model, are analyzed with different degrees of mesh orthogonality. The results imply that the numerical solution of wall distance in the boundary layer has a relatively large error when the mesh orthogonality is bad, having a large effect on the accuracy of the turbulence/transition model. In detail, the Wilcox-k-ω turbulence model is unaffected by mesh orthogonality; under the condition of mesh non-orthogonality, the SA model leads to a substantially larger friction drag and change in the location of shock wave; the SST model also leads to a larger friction drag under the condition of mesh non-orthogonality, whose effect is much less than that for SA model; and the γ-Re_θt-SST model leads to a substantial upstream shift of transition location.

The freestream turbulence intensity is an important parameter for Tollmien–Schlichting waves and is also used as one of the key variables for the local- and transport-equation-based transition model in the simulations. To obtain the similar turbulence level in the vicinity to the aircraft as the turbulence intensity measured in a wind tunnel or in free-flight conditions, the sustaining turbulence term can be used for the transition model. It is important to investigate the model behavior when the sustaining turbulence is coupled with the frequently used SST-variants for transitional flows. Additionally, it is essential to obtain a nearly independent solution using the same transition model for different users on different meshes with similar grid resolution for purposes of verification and validation. So far, the relevant work has not been performed sufficiently and the sustaining turbulence technology introduces non-independent results into the freestream values. Thus, a modified sustaining turbulence approach is adopted and investigated in several test cases, including a computational effort on NACA0021 test case at 10 angles of attack. The results indicate that the modified sustaining turbulence in conjunction with the SST-2003 turbulence model yields results nearly independent to the freestream value of ω for the prediction of both streamwise and crossflow transition for two-dimensional flows without increasing computational effort too much. For three-dimensional flow, the sensitivity to initial value of ω is reduced significantly as well in comparison to the SST-based transition model, and it is highly recommended to use present sustaining turbulence technology in conjunction with the SST-2003-based transition model for engineering applications.