Nicholas Clemett

Mr. Nicholas Clemett

Helmut Schmidt University, Hamburg, Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2023 in Journal of Structural Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NCNicholas Clemett
Nicholas Clemett
WGWilson Wladimir Carofilis Gallo
Wilson Wladimir Carofilis Gallo
Giammaria GabbianelliGiammaria Gabbianelli
Giammaria Gabbianelli
GOGerard J. O'Reilly
Gerard J. O'Reilly
Ricardo MonteiroRicardo Monteiro
Ricardo Monteiro
A large portion of aging existing buildings are susceptible to significant structural damage during earthquakes and suffer from poor energy performance. When considering how to improve the seismic performance and energy efficiency of these structures, retrofitting has been shown to be a more attractive alternative compared to complete demolition and reconstruction. Not only is retrofitting generally preferable from an economic perspective, but it also typically has lower levels of social and environmental impact as well. Together, these three aspects (economic, social, and environmental) form the so-called three pillars of sustainability. Recently, research efforts have begun to focus on developments in combined and integrated seismic and energy retrofit frameworks and techniques, showing that investing in combined retrofitting schemes is often more cost effective than conducting either energy-efficiency or seismic retrofitting alone. As new national and transnational policies place greater emphasis on the environmental impact of the built environment, it is crucial that combined retrofit schemes be evaluated in a comprehensive manner that allows for the selection of optimal schemes when a range of key sustainability-related decision variables (DVs) are considered. This study investigated the selection of a life cycle assessment (LCA)-based optimal combination of seismic and energy-efficiency retrofit schemes for an existing reinforced concrete case-study building in Italy. The seismic performance of the retrofit schemes was evaluated using detailed nonlinear time-history analysis and the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Centre’s performance-based earthquake engineering (PEER-PBEE) framework, and the resulting economic costs and environmental impacts were incorporated into the LCA methodology. A detailed energy assessment was performed for each retrofit scheme so that the costs and environmental impacts associated with the operation of the building could be included in the LCA. Subsequently, the characteristics of each retrofit scheme were evaluated for a range of additional DVs, which encompassed the three pillars of sustainability. Finally, a multicriteria decision-making process was used to evaluate the optimal combination of seismic and energy retrofit schemes for several locations exhibiting different combinations of seismicity and climatic conditions. The results of this study provide insight into which combinations of seismic and energy efficiency retrofit measures can produce optimal solutions within the constraints set by decision makers and illustrate how assessments of both seismic and energy retrofit interventions can be implemented in the future.
1

16 June 2022 in Buildings
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Wilson Wladimir CarofilisWilson Wladimir Carofilis
Wilson Wladimir Carofilis
NCNicholas Clemett
Nicholas Clemett
Giammaria GabbianelliGiammaria Gabbianelli
Giammaria Gabbianelli
GOGerard J. O'Reilly
Gerard J. O'Reilly
Ricardo MonteiroRicardo Monteiro
Ricardo Monteiro
Modern society requires that structures exhibit greater levels of resilience, especially under earthquakes. The seismic resilience of buildings is thus gaining increased attention as a particular, beyond-code approach. Seismically retrofitted buildings behave satisfactorily under expected earthquake scenarios; however, this does not guarantee operativity after a seismic event. This study critically reviews several methods currently available in the literature that quantify the seismic resilience level of buildings from different perspectives. An existing reinforced concrete school building, retrofitted according to four distinct strategies, is first evaluated in terms of seismic resilience levels. The overview and critical analysis of available resilience assessment frameworks determine the most suitable parameters to measure the seismic resilience for buildings. Subsequently, this metric is incorporated as an additional decision variable into an integrated seismic and energy retrofitting set of strategies. A multicriteria decision-making analysis is performed to select the optimally combined seismic and energy retrofitting alternative under social, technical, environmental evaluation, and seismic resilience aspects. We show how resilience impacts the preference for integrated seismic and energy retrofitting strategies, especially when this metric is considered as an annualized expected value.

10 May 2023 in Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NCNicholas Clemett
Nicholas Clemett
CRClarissa Rapps
Clarissa Rapps
MGMax Gündel
Max Gündel

1 January 2021
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
WCWilson Carofilis
Wilson Carofilis
NCNicholas Clemett
Nicholas Clemett
Giammaria GabbianelliGiammaria Gabbianelli
Giammaria Gabbianelli
GOGerard J. O'Reilly
Gerard J. O'Reilly
Ricardo MonteiroRicardo Monteiro
Ricardo Monteiro
SELECTION OF OPTIMAL SEISMIC RETROFITTING FOR EXISTING SCHOOL BUILDINGS THROUGH MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING - 8th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering - 28-30 June 2021, Streamed from Athens, Greece