Stephanie E A Burnell

Dr. Stephanie E A Burnell


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2019 in Carbohydrate Polymers
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AAAyesha Al-Sabah
Ayesha Al-Sabah
SBStephanie E A Burnell
Stephanie E A Burnell
ISIrina N. Simoes
Irina N. Simoes
ZJZita Jessop
Zita Jessop
NBNafiseh Badiei
Nafiseh Badiei
IWIain S. Whitaker
Iain S. Whitaker

20 December 2021 in Immunotherapy Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBStephanie E A Burnell
Stephanie E A Burnell
LCLorenzo Capitani
Lorenzo Capitani
BMBruce J MacLachlan
Bruce J MacLachlan
GMGeorgina H Mason
Georgina H Mason
AGAwen M Gallimore
Awen M Gallimore
AGAndrew Godkin
Andrew Godkin
Despite three decades of research to its name and increasing interest in immunotherapies that target it, LAG-3 remains an elusive co-inhibitory receptor in comparison to the well-established PD-1 and CTLA-4. As such, LAG-3 targeting therapies have yet to achieve the clinical success of therapies targeting other checkpoints. This could, in part, be attributed to the many unanswered questions that remain regarding LAG-3 biology. Of these, we address: (i) the function of the many LAG-3-ligand interactions, (ii) the hurdles that remain to acquire a high-resolution structure of LAG-3, (iii) the under-studied LAG-3 signal transduction mechanism, (iv) the elusive soluble form of LAG-3, (v) the implications of the lack of (significant) phenotype of LAG-3 knockout mice, (vi) the reports of LAG-3 expression on the epithelium, and (vii) the conflicting reports of LAG-3 expression (and potential contributions to pathology) in the brain. These mysteries which surround LAG-3 highlight how the ever-evolving study of its biology continues to reveal ever-increasing complexity in its role as an immune receptor. Importantly, answering the questions which shroud LAG-3 in mystery will allow the maximum therapeutic benefit of LAG-3 targeting immunotherapies in cancer, autoimmunity and beyond.

19 April 2018 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBStephanie E A Burnell
Stephanie E A Burnell
SSSamantha Spencer-Harty
Samantha Spencer-Harty
SHSuzie Howarth
Suzie Howarth
OBOwen Bodger
Owen Bodger
HKHoward Kynaston
Howard Kynaston
SDShareen H Doak
Shareen H Doak
Six-transmembrane epithelial antigen of the prostate-2 (STEAP2) expression is increased in prostate cancer when compared to normal prostate, suggesting STEAP2 may drive prostate cancer progression. This study aimed to establish the functional role of STEAP2 in prostate tumourigenesis and evaluate if its knockdown resulted in reduced invasive potential of prostate cancer cells. PC3 and LNCaP cells were transfected with STEAP2 siRNA and proliferation, migration, invasion and gene expression analyses were performed. STEAP2 immunohistochemistry was applied to assess the protein expression and localisation according to Gleason score in 164 prostate cancer patients. Invasion significantly decreased in both cell lines following STEAP2 knockdown. PC3 proliferation and migration capacity significantly reduced, while LNCaP cell morphology and growth characteristics were altered. Additionally, STEAP2 downstream targets associated with driving invasion were identified as MMP3, MMP10, MMP13, FGFR4, IL1β, KiSS1 and SERPINE1 in PC3 cells and, MMP7 in LNCaP cells, with CD82 altered in both. In patient tissues, STEAP2 expression was significantly increased in prostate cancer samples and this significantly correlated with Gleason score. These data demonstrate that STEAP2 drives aggressive prostate cancer traits by promoting proliferation, migration and invasion and significantly influencing the transcriptional profile of ten genes underlying the metastatic cascade.

8 August 2019 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SBStephanie E A Burnell
Stephanie E A Burnell
SSSamantha Spencer-Harty
Samantha Spencer-Harty
SHSuzie Howarth
Suzie Howarth
OBOwen Bodger
Owen Bodger
HKHoward Kynaston
Howard Kynaston
SDShareen H Doak
Shareen H Doak
Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer diagnosed in men worldwide; however, few patients are affected by clinically significant disease within their lifetime. Unfortunately, the means to discriminate between patients with indolent disease and those who progress to aggressive prostate cancer is currently unavailable, resulting in over-treatment of patients. We therefore aimed to determine biomarkers of prostate cancer that can be used in the clinic to aid the diagnosis and prognosis. Immunohistochemistry analysis was carried out on prostate cancer specimens with a range of Gleason scores. Samples were stained and analysed for intensity of the Seven Transmembrane Epithelial Antigen of the Prostate (STEAP)-1, -2, -3, -4 and the Divalent Metal Transporter 1 (DMT1) proteins to determine suitable biomarkers for classification of patients likely to develop aggressive prostate cancer. Additionally, these proteins were also analysed to determine whether any would be able to predict future relapse using Kaplan Meier analysis. Data generated demonstrated that the protein expression levels of STEAP2 correlated significantly with Gleason score; furthermore, STEAP4 was a significant predictor of relapse. This data indicates that STEAP2 could be potential prognostic candidate for use in combination with the current prostate cancer detection methods and the presence of STEAP4 could be an indicator of possible relapse.

1 January 2021 in Oxford Open Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DSD Oliver Scourfield
D Oliver Scourfield
SRSophie G Reed
Sophie G Reed
MQMax Quastel
Max Quastel
JAJennifer Alderson
Jennifer Alderson
VBValentina M T Bart
Valentina M T Bart
SBStephanie E A Burnell
Stephanie E A Burnell
Coronavirus disease 2019 has generated a rapidly evolving field of research, with the global scientific community striving for solutions to the current pandemic. Characterizing humoral responses towards SARS-CoV-2, as well as closely related strains, will help determine whether antibodies are central to infection control, and aid the design of therapeutics and vaccine candidates. This review outlines the major aspects of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody research to date, with a focus on the various prophylactic and therapeutic uses of antibodies to alleviate disease in addition to the potential of cross-reactive therapies and the implications of long-term immunity.

1 February 2022 in Current Opinion in Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
APAna Pires
Ana Pires
SBStephanie E A Burnell
Stephanie E A Burnell
AGAwen Gallimore
Awen Gallimore