Bruno Vilela

Prof. Bruno Vilela

Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 February 2015 in Ecography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MAMatthew E. Aiello‐Lammens
Matthew E. Aiello‐Lammens
RBRobert A. Boria
Robert A. Boria
ARAleksandar Radosavljevic
Aleksandar Radosavljevic
Bruno VilelaBruno Vilela
Bruno Vilela
RARobert P. Anderson
Robert P. Anderson

18 May 2015 in Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Bruno VilelaBruno Vilela
Bruno Vilela
FVFabricio Villalobos
Fabricio Villalobos

7 December 2017 in Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JKJamie M. Kass
Jamie M. Kass
Bruno VilelaBruno Vilela
Bruno Vilela
MAMatthew E. Aiello‐Lammens
Matthew E. Aiello‐Lammens
RMRobert Muscarella
Robert Muscarella
CMCory Merow
Cory Merow
RARobert P. Anderson
Robert P. Anderson
Scientific research increasingly calls for open‐source software that is flexible, interactive, and expandable, while providing methodological guidance and reproducibility. Currently, many analyses in ecology are implemented with “black box” graphical user interfaces (GUIs) that lack flexibility or command‐line interfaces that are infrequently used by non‐specialists. To help remedy this situation in the context of species distribution modeling, we created Wallace, an open and modular application with a richly documented GUI with underlying R scripts that is flexible and highly interactive. Wallace guides users from acquiring and processing data to building models and examining predictions. Additionally, it is designed to grow via community contributions of new modules to expand functionality. All results are downloadable, along with code to reproduce the analysis. Wallace provides an example of an innovative platform to increase access to cutting‐edge methods and encourage plurality in science and collaboration in software development.

17 September 2021 in Science Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DGDaniel Gonçalves-Souza
Daniel Gonçalves-Souza
Bruno VilelaBruno Vilela
Bruno Vilela
BPBen Phalan
Ben Phalan
RDRicardo Dobrovolski
Ricardo Dobrovolski
Protected areas in Brazil are effective in reducing loss of natural vegetation, especially in Amazon and indigenous lands.

25 November 2014 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DSDaniel Paiva Silva
Daniel Paiva Silva
Bruno VilelaBruno Vilela
Bruno Vilela
PMPaulo De Marco
Paulo De Marco
ANAndré Nemésio
André Nemésio
The role of past connections between the two major South American forested biomes on current species distribution has been recognized a long time ago. Climatic oscillations that further separated these biomes have promoted parapatric speciation, in which many species had their continuous distribution split, giving rise to different but related species (i.e., different potential distributions and realized niche features). The distribution of many sister species of orchid bees follow this pattern. Here, using ecological niche models and niche analyses, we (1) tested the role of ecological niche differentiation on the divergence between sister orchid-bees (genera Eulaema and Eufriesea) from the Amazon and Atlantic forests, and (2) highlighted interesting areas for new surveys. Amazonian species occupied different realized niches than their Atlantic sister species. Conversely, species of sympatric but distantly related Eulaema bees occupied similar realized niches. Amazonian species had a wide potential distribution in South America, whereas Atlantic Forest species were more limited to the eastern coast of the continent. Additionally, we identified several areas in need of future surveys. Our results show that the realized niche of Atlantic-Amazonian sister species of orchid bees, which have been previously treated as allopatric populations of three species, had limited niche overlap and similarity. These findings agree with their current taxonomy, which treats each of those populations as distinct valid species.

15 February 2017 in Journal of Biogeography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BHBradford Hawkins
Bradford Hawkins
BLBoris Leroy
Boris Leroy
MRMiguel Á. Rodríguez
Miguel Á. Rodríguez
ASAlexander Singer
Alexander Singer
Bruno VilelaBruno Vilela
Bruno Vilela
DZDavid Zelený
David Zelený