Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of five commonly used automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) systems in China (Vitek 2, Phoenix, Microscan, TDR, and DL). Materials and methods: Two “unknown” isolates, S1 (ESBL-producing Escherichia coli) and S2 (KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae), were sent to 886 hospitals in China for identification and AST. Using broth microdilution method (BMD) as gold standard, minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined. Results: Most hospitals (392, 46.1%) used Vitek 2, followed by 16% each for Phoenix, Microscan, and DL systems, and 5.9% (50) used TDR system. MICs of 22 antimicrobials were evaluated for two study isolates plus three ATCC strains. Individual susceptibility results for three ATCC strains (n=1581) were submitted by 780 (91.2%) hospitals. For each AST system, 8.7% (6/69) to 13.0% (33/253) reported MICs outside the expected range for several drugs. For the two study isolates, TDR and DL systems performed the worst in MIC determination and susceptibility categorization of cefazolin and cefepime, while the Microscan system had difficulties in susceptibility categorization for aztreonam and ertapenem. Categorical agreements were >90% for most antimicrobials tested for both the isolates, among which, using BMD, no essential agreements were noted for ampicillin, piperacillin, cefazolin, cefuroxime, ceftriaxone, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. All AST systems except Vitek 2 showed unacceptable VMEs for cefazolin (S1 and S2) and major errors for ceftazidime, cefepime, and aztreonam (isolate S1), while Vitek 2 showed a high VME rate for cefepime (10.0%) and meropenem (6.2%) for S2. Conclusion: None of the five automated systems met the criteria for acceptable AST performance, but Vitek 2 provided a relatively accurate and conservative performance for most of the antimicrobials.

Background: Infections caused by linezolid-resistant enterococci (LRE) are clinically difficult to treat and threaten patient health. However, there is a lack of studies on long time-span LRE strains in China. For this reason, our study comprehensively revealed the resistance mechanisms of LRE strains collected in a Chinese tertiary care hospital from 2011 to 2022. Methods: Enterococcal strains were screened and verified after retrospective analysis of microbial data. Subsequently, 65 LRE strains (61 Enterococcus faecalis and 4 Enterococcus faecium, MIC ≥ 8 µg/ml), 1 linezolid-intermediate Enterococcus faecium (MIC = 4 µg/ml) and 1 linezolid-susceptible Enterococcus faecium (MIC = 1.5 µg/ml) were submitted for whole-genome sequencing (WGS) analysis and bioinformatics analysis. Results: The optrA gene was found to be the most common linezolid resistance mechanism in our study. We identified the wild-type OptrA and various OptrA variants in 98.5% of LRE strains (61 Enterococcus faecalis and 3 Enterococcus faecium). We also found one linezolid-resistant Enterococcus faecium strain carried both optrA and cfr(D) gene, while one linezolid-resistant Enterococcus faecium only harbored the poxtA gene. Most optrA genes (55/64) were located on plasmids, with impB-fexA-optrA, impB-fexA-optrA-erm(A), fexA-optrA-erm(A), and fexA-optrA segments. A minority of optrA genes (9/64) were found on chromosomes with the Tn6674-like platform. Besides, other possible linezolid resistance-associated mechanisms (mutations in the rplC and rplD genes) were also found in 26 enterococcal strains. Conclusions: Our study suggested that multiple mechanisms of linezolid resistance exist among clinical LRE strains in China.

Objectives: Ceftazidime–avibactam is a novel synthetic beta-lactam + beta-lactamase inhibitor combination. We evaluated the performance of the gradient diffusion strip method and the disk diffusion method for the determination of ceftazidime–avibactam against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Methods: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of 302 clinical Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from two centers were conducted by broth microdilution (BMD), gradient diffusion strip method, and disk diffusion method for ceftazidime–avibactam. Using BMD as a gold standard, essential agreement (EA), categorical agreement (CA), major error (ME), and very major error (VME) were determined according to CLSI guidelines. CA and EA rate > 90%, ME rate < 3%, and VME rate < 1.5% were considered as acceptable criteria. Polymerase chain reaction and Sanger sequencing were performed to determine the carbapenem resistance genes of all 302 isolates.Results: A total of 302 strains were enrolled, among which 182 strains were from center 1 and 120 strains were from center 2. A percentage of 18.21% (55/302) of the enrolled isolates were resistant to ceftazidime–avibactam. The CA rates of the gradient diffusion strip method for Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa were 100% and 98.65% (73/74), respectively, and the EA rates were 97.37% (222/228) and 98.65% (73/74), respectively. The CA rates of the disk diffusion method for Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa were 100% and 95.95% (71/74), respectively. No VMEs were found by using the gradient diffusion strip method, while the ME rate was 0.40% (1/247). No MEs were found by using the disk diffusion method, but the VME rate was 5.45% (3/55). Therefore, all the parameters of the gradient diffusion strip method were in line with acceptable criteria. For 31 bla_KPC, 33 bla_NDM, 7 bla_IMP, and 2 bla_VIM positive isolates, both CA and EA rates were 100%; no MEs or VMEs were detected by either method. For 15 carbapenemase-non-producing resistant isolates, the CA and EA rates of the gradient diffusion strips method were 100%. Whereas the CA rate of the disk diffusion method was 80.00% (12/15), the VME rate was 20.00% (3/15).Conclusion: The gradient diffusion strip method can meet the needs of clinical microbiological laboratories for testing the susceptibility of ceftazidime–avibactam drugs. However, the VME rate > 1.5% (5.45%) by the disk diffusion method. By comparison, the performance of the gradient diffusion strip method was better than that of the disk diffusion method.

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are emerging pathogens responsible for increasing skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) globally. However, the diagnosis and treatment of NTM SSTIs face significant challenges due to the lack of standardized guidelines. This study reviewed the clinical characteristics, diagnostic challenges, and treatment outcomes of NTM SSTIs in a large cohort from a tertiary referral center in Beijing, China. We retrospectively reviewed 142 patients diagnosed with NTM SSTIs at a tertiary hospital from 2014 to 2023. Data collected included clinical presentation, microbiologic and histopathologic findings, diagnostic methods, treatment regimens, and outcomes. The patients were categorized based on NTM species, and immunocompromised status. The cohort included patients with various NTM species, with M. marinum, M. avium complex (MAC), and M. abscessus complex (MABC) being the most common. The number of patients with NTM infections increased annually (p < 0.01). Fifty-four patients (38.0 %) were immunocompromised. The likelihood of immunosuppression was significantly higher in the MAC group (90.0 %, p = 0.02) and M. kansasii group (80.0 %). The highest proportion of sporotrichosis-pattern lesions was observed in M. marinum infections (p = 0.03). MAC primarily caused extracutaneous disseminated infections (p = 0.05), and immunosuppressed patients were more likely to have extracutaneous infections (79.6 %, p = 0.01). Of the 41 disseminated infection cases, 17.1 % had prior pulmonary NTM infections later disseminated to the skin and had a significantly worse prognosis (p < 0.01). Most misdiagnosed cases (82.6 %) were initially considered skin tuberculosis and bacterial infections. Amikacin was the most consistently effective antibiotic, while resistance to cefoxitin and imipenem was common in MABC and M. chelonae. The MABC strains exhibited 40 % resistance to clarithromycin. Drug side effects occurred in 30.3 % of patients, with 8.5 % switching medications due to adverse impacts. The longest treatment duration was in M. kansasii cases (371.4 days, p = 0.03). Immunosuppressed patients received more drugs (Mean ± SD: 3.0 ± 0.9 vs 2.8 ± 0.7, p = 0.02), whereas showed a nonsignificant trend toward longer treatment durations. The study highlighted significant challenges in differentiating NTM infections from other conditions and managing their diverse clinical manifestations. Enhanced diagnostic tools and standardized treatment guidelines are essential to improve patient outcomes and manage the increasing burden of NTM SSTIs.

Background: Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) usually invades vulnerable hosts. Disseminated NTM (dNTM) infection can affect nearly all organs and be easily misdiagnosed as metastatic carcinoma or other systemic diseases, especially in seemingly immunocompetent hosts. Identification of underlying immunodeficiency is critical for the diagnosis and treatment of dNTM. Adult-onset immunodeficiency (AOID) with anti-IFN-γ autoantibodies has recently been recognized as a crucial but frequently neglected risk factor for dNTM infection. Frequent relapses of infection are common in AOID patients despite appropriate anti-infective treatment and B-cell-depleting therapy has shown some promising results. Herein, we report a case of dNTM infection mimicking malignancy in an AOID patient who was successfully treated with rituximab. Case presentation: A middle-aged male presented with fever, productive cough, multifocal skin abscesses and multiple osteolytic lesions with pathological fractures. Chest CT revealed consolidation of the lingula while bronchoscopy showed a mass completely blocking the airway opening of the inferior lingual segment. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing and mycobacterial culture of skin pus and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid reported Mycobacterium Colombiense, confirming the diagnosis of dNTM infection. However, anti-NTM antibiotics alone failed to prevent disease relapse and progression. Further evaluation indicated undetectable serum IFN-γ concentration and high-titer autoantibodies against IFN-γ, suggesting that AOID was the underlying reason for dNTM. Rituximab was added to treatment and successfully controlled the infection without relapse at one-year follow-up. Conclusion: We reported a rare case of disseminated Mycobacterium Colombiense infection manifested with pulmonary mass, pathological fracture and dermapostasis in a host with AOID. Our case demonstrated that AOID should be screened when patients get the episode of disseminated NTM infection particularly when other risk factors are excluded. Besides prolonged anti-NTM therapy, AOID-associated NTM infection should be treated with B-cell-depleting therapy to prevent recurrence.

Infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterobacterales , especially carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), have been a challenging clinical problem due to the limited therapeutic options. Therefore, the need to develop novel antimicrobial agents and evaluate their activities against Enterobacterales in vitro is urgent.