Nalan Karunanayake

Dr. Nalan Karunanayake


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 January 2025 in Tomography
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NKNalan Karunanayake
Nalan Karunanayake
Lin LuLin Lu
Lin Lu
HYHao Yang
Hao Yang
PGPengfei Geng
Pengfei Geng
OAOguz Akin
Oguz Akin
BZBinsheng Zhao
Binsheng Zhao
Objectives: Accurate kidney and tumor segmentation of computed tomography (CT) scans is vital for diagnosis and treatment, but manual methods are time-consuming and inconsistent, highlighting the value of AI automation. This study develops a fully automated AI model using vision transformers (ViTs) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to detect and segment kidneys and kidney tumors in Contrast-Enhanced (CECT) scans, with a focus on improving sensitivity for small, indistinct tumors. Methods: The segmentation framework employs a ViT-based model for the kidney organ, followed by a 3D UNet model with enhanced connections and attention mechanisms for tumor detection and segmentation. Two CECT datasets were used: a public dataset (KiTS23: 489 scans) and a private institutional dataset (Private: 592 scans). The AI model was trained on 389 public scans, with validation performed on the remaining 100 scans and external validation performed on all 592 private scans. Tumors were categorized by TNM staging as small (≤4 cm) (KiTS23: 54%, Private: 41%), medium (>4 cm to ≤7 cm) (KiTS23: 24%, Private: 35%), and large (>7 cm) (KiTS23: 22%, Private: 24%) for detailed evaluation. Results: Kidney and kidney tumor segmentations were evaluated against manual annotations as the reference standard. The model achieved a Dice score of 0.97 ± 0.02 for kidney organ segmentation. For tumor detection and segmentation on the KiTS23 dataset, the sensitivities and average false-positive rates per patient were as follows: 0.90 and 0.23 for small tumors, 1.0 and 0.08 for medium tumors, and 0.96 and 0.04 for large tumors. The corresponding Dice scores were 0.84 ± 0.11, 0.89 ± 0.07, and 0.91 ± 0.06, respectively. External validation on the private data confirmed the model’s effectiveness, achieving the following sensitivities and average false-positive rates per patient: 0.89 and 0.15 for small tumors, 0.99 and 0.03 for medium tumors, and 1.0 and 0.01 for large tumors. The corresponding Dice scores were 0.84 ± 0.08, 0.89 ± 0.08, and 0.92 ± 0.06. Conclusions: The proposed model demonstrates consistent and robust performance in segmenting kidneys and kidney tumors of various sizes, with effective generalization to unseen data. This underscores the model’s significant potential for clinical integration, offering enhanced diagnostic precision and reliability in radiological assessments.

6 December 2023 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NKNalan Karunanayake
Nalan Karunanayake
SMSamart Moodleah
Samart Moodleah
Stanislav MakhanovStanislav Makhanov
Stanislav Makhanov
A segmentation model of the ultrasound (US) images of breast tumors based on virtual agents trained using reinforcement learning (RL) is proposed. The agents, living in the edge map, are able to avoid false boundaries, connect broken parts, and finally, accurately delineate the contour of the tumor. The agents move similarly to robots navigating in the unknown environment with the goal of maximizing the rewards. The individual agent does not know the goal of the entire population. However, since the robots communicate, the model is able to understand the global information and fit the irregular boundaries of complicated objects. Combining the RL with a neural network makes it possible to automatically learn and select the local features. In particular, the agents handle the edge leaks and artifacts typical for the US images. The proposed model outperforms 13 state-of-the-art algorithms, including selected deep learning models and their modifications.

24 December 2024
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
Thathsara NanayakkaraThathsara Nanayakkara
Thathsara Nanayakkara
GNG. A. S. Y. Nanayakkara
G. A. S. Y. Nanayakkara
KKK. M. C. M. Karunanayaka
K. M. C. M. Karunanayaka
CKC. P. T. K. Kumara
C. P. T. K. Kumara
NKNalan Karunanayake
Nalan Karunanayake

1 April 2024 in Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LGLakshani Gunawardhana
Lakshani Gunawardhana
NKNalan Karunanayake
Nalan Karunanayake
PTP. Indika Thushari
P. Indika Thushari

13 May 2026 in Journal of Medical Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NKNalan Karunanayake
Nalan Karunanayake

4 September 2026 in International Journal of Network Dynamics and Intelligence
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NKNalan Karunanayake
Nalan Karunanayake
SNSavindu Nanayakkara
Savindu Nanayakkara
KHKasun Gayashan Hettihewa
Kasun Gayashan Hettihewa
Upaka RathnayakeUpaka Rathnayake
Upaka Rathnayake
Agentic AI systems that reason, plan, and act on complex goals have advanced rapidly across software engineering, scientific discovery, drug development, healthcare, finance, and social simulation. Across these domains a single failure pattern recurs: current systems can execute tasks competently but often struggle to determine when to act, when to pause, when to change strategy, and when to involve a human. Existing reviews catalog agentic architectures, taxonomies, and limitations, but none specify what capabilities these systems must acquire to support dynamic human-AI collaboration. We address that gap. We define collaborative AI as a class of systems that combine generative exploration with autonomous action and calibrate between them based on context, uncertainty, and task demands. We identify four required capabilities: metacognition, contextual mode-switching, uncertainty-aware action, and adaptive human collaboration. We relate these capabilities to established multi-agent systems foundations, including belief-desire-intention architectures, adjustable autonomy, mixed-initiative interaction, and decentralized decision-theoretic control, while specifying the distinct challenges that LLM-based agents introduce. Across the six domains reviewed here, these gaps appear repeatedly and are not solved by current architectures, which positions collaborative AI as a concrete near-term research objective.