Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute polyneuropathy mostly characterized by acute flaccid paralysis with or without sensory/autonomous nerve dysfunction. Current immuno therapies including intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), plasma exchange (PE), and newly developed biological drugs benefit patients by alleviating hyperreactive immune responses. Up to 30% of patients develop respiratory failure during hospitalization and require mechanical ventilation and intensive care. Immunotherapies, mechanical ventilation, supportive care, and complication management during the intensive care unit (ICU) stay are equally emphasized. The most important aspect of intensive care and treatment of severe GBS, that is, mechanical ventilation, has been extensively reviewed elsewhere. In contrast to immunotherapies, care and treatment of GBS in the ICU setting are largely empirical. In this review, we intend to stress the importance of intensive care and treatment, other than mechanical ventilation in patients with severe GBS. We summarize the up-to-date knowledge of pharmacological therapies and ICU management of patients with severe GBS. We aim to answer some key clinical questions related to the management of severe GBS patients including but not limited to: Is IVIg better than PE or vice versa? Whether combinations of immune therapies benefit more? How about the emerging therapies promising for GBS? When to perform tracheal intubation or tracheostomy? How to provide multidisciplinary supportive care for severe cases? How to avert life-threatening complications in severe cases?

A complex network precisely regulates the cell cycle through the G₁, S, G₂, and M phases and is the basis for cell division under physiological and pathological conditions. On the one hand, the transition from one phase to another as well as the progression within each phase is driven by the specific cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs; e.g., CDK1, CDK2, CDK4, CDK6, and CDK7), together with their exclusive partner cyclins (e.g., cyclin A1, B1, D1–3, and E1). On the other hand, these phases are negatively regulated by endogenous CDK inhibitors such as p16^ink4a, p18^ink4c, p19^ink4d, p21^cip1, and p27^kip1. In addition, several checkpoints control the commitment of cells to replicate DNA and undergo mitosis, thereby avoiding the passage of genomic errors to daughter cells. CDKs are often constitutively activated in cancer, which is characterized by the uncontrolled proliferation of transformed cells, due to genetic and epigenetic abnormalities in the genes involved in the cell cycle. Moreover, several oncogenes and defective tumor suppressors promote malignant changes by stimulating cell cycle entry and progression or disrupting DNA damage responses, including the cell cycle checkpoints, DNA repair mechanisms, and apoptosis. Thus, genes or proteins related to cell cycle regulation remain the main targets of interest in the treatment of various cancer types, including hematologic malignancies. In this context, advances in the understanding of the cell cycle regulatory machinery provide a basis for the development of novel therapeutic approaches. The present article summarizes the pathways as well as their genetic and epigenetic alterations that regulate the cell cycle; moreover, it discusses the various approved or potential therapeutic targets associated with the cell cycle, focusing on hematologic malignancies.

Chromobox (CBX) proteins are important epigenetic regulatory proteins and are widely involved in biological processes, such as embryonic development, the maintenance of stem cell characteristics and the regulation of cell proliferation and apoptosis. Disorder and dysfunction of CBXs in cancer usually lead to the blockade or ectoptic activation of developmental pathways, promoting the occurrence, development and progression of cancer. In the present review, the characteristics and functions of CBXs were first introduced. Subsequently, the expression of CBXs in cancers and the relationship between CBXs and clinical characteristics (mainly cancer grade, stage, metastasis and relapse) and prognosis were discussed. Finally, it was described how CBXs regulate cell proliferation and self‑renewal, apoptosis and the acquisition of malignant phenotypes, such as invasion, migration and chemoresistance, through mechanisms involving epigenetic modification, nuclear translocation, noncoding RNA interactions, transcriptional regulation, posttranslational modifications, protein‑protein interactions, signal transduction and metabolic reprogramming. The study also focused on cancer therapies targeting CBXs. The present review provides new insight and a comprehensive basis for follow‑up research on CBXs and cancer.

The prevalence of tension-type headache (TTH) is extremely high worldwide, but comprehensive global epidemiological studies targeting the specific age group of 15–39 years remain relatively limited. This study utilized data from the Global Burden of Disease 2021 (GBD 2021) study to analyze the incidence, prevalence, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) associated with TTH, and identified temporal trends using the estimated annual percentage change (EAPC). The study also investigated the association between the burden of TTH and the Socio-demographic Index (SDI). From 1990 to 2021, the global burden of TTH increased, with a 38% rise in prevalence cases and incidence cases. Across SDI regions, middle SDI region experienced the most significant growth in TTH cases, while high SDI regions showed a decline. Globally, the 35–39 age group faces a more severe disease burden, with prevalence cases at 188.27 (95% UI: 123.88–252.96) million, incidence cases at 61.82 (95% UI: 39.02–87.97) million, and DALYs cases at 461.94 (95% UI: 118.38–1494.8) thousand. From 1990 to 2021, the global epidemiological burden of TTH has shown a sustained increase. The most pronounced rise occurred in middle SDI regions, highlighting the urgent need for targeted public health strategies to enhance the quality of life among AYAs affected by TTH.

Chromobox (CBX) 2, a member of the CBX protein family and a crucial component of the polycomb repressive complex (PRC), exerts significant influence on the epigenetic regulation of tumorigenesis, including glioma. However, the precise role of CBX2 in glioma has remained elusive. In our study, we observed a substantial upregulation of CBX2 expression in glioma, which displayed a strong correlation with pathological grade, chemoresistance, and unfavorable prognosis. Through a series of in vivo and in vitro experiments, we established that heightened CBX2 expression facilitated glioma cell proliferation and bolstered resistance to chemotherapy. Conversely, CBX2 knockdown led to a significant inhibition of glioma cell growth and a reduction in chemoresistance. Notably, our investigation uncovered the underlying mechanism by which CBX2 operates, primarily by inhibiting PTEN transcription and activating the AKT/mTOR signalling pathway. Conversely, silencing CBX2 curtailed cell proliferation and attenuated chemoresistance by impeding the activation of the PTEN/AKT/mTOR signalling pathway. Delving deeper into the molecular intricacies, we discovered that CBX2 can recruit EZH2 and modulate the trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27me3) levels on the PTEN promoter, effectively suppressing PTEN transcription. Our research unveils a comprehensive understanding of how CBX2 impacts the tumorigenesis, progression, chemoresistance, and prognosis of glioma. Furthermore, it presents CBX2 as a promising therapeutic target for drug development and clinical management of glioma.