Hatice Tankisi

Prof. Hatice Tankisi

Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Midtjylland, Denmark

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2020 in Clinical Neurophysiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HTHatice Tankisi
Hatice Tankisi
DBDavid Burke
David Burke
LCLiying Cui
Liying Cui
MCMamede de Carvalho
Mamede de Carvalho
SKSatoshi Kuwabara
Satoshi Kuwabara
AFAnders Fuglsang-Frederiksen
Anders Fuglsang-Frederiksen
Standardization of Electromyography (EMG) instrumentation is of particular importance to ensure high quality recordings. This consensus report on "Standards of Instrumentation of EMG" is an update and extension of the earlier IFCN Guidelines published in 1999. First, a panel of experts in different fields from different geographical distributions was invited to submit a section on their particular interest and expertise. Then, the merged document was circulated for comments and edits until a consensus emerged. The first sections in this document cover technical aspects such as instrumentation, EMG hardware and software including amplifiers and filters, digital signal analysis and instrumentation settings. Other sections cover the topics such as temporary storage, trigger and delay line, averaging, electrode types, stimulation techniques for optimal and standardised EMG examinations, and the artefacts electromyographers may face and safety rules they should follow. Finally, storage of data and databases, report generators and external communication are summarized.

23 June 2022 in European Journal of Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EHEva K. Hejbøl
Eva K. Hejbøl
THThomas Harbo
Thomas Harbo
JAJane Agergaard
Jane Agergaard
LMLine B. Madsen
Line B. Madsen
TPThomas H. Pedersen
Thomas H. Pedersen
HTHatice Tankisi
Hatice Tankisi
Background and purpose: Among post‐COVID‐19 symptoms, fatigue is reported as one of the most common, even after mild acute infection, and as the cause of fatigue, myopathy diagnosed by electromyography has been proposed in previous reports. This study aimed to explore the histopathological changes in patients with post‐COVID‐19 fatigue.Methods: Sixteen patients (mean age = 46 years) with post‐COVID‐19 complaints of fatigue, myalgia, or weakness persisting for up to 14 months were included. In all patients, quantitative electromyography and muscle biopsies analyzed with light and electron microscopy were taken.Results: Muscle weakness was present in 50% and myopathic electromyography in 75%, and in all patients there were histological changes. Muscle fiber atrophy was found in 38%, and 56% showed indications of fiber regeneration. Mitochondrial changes, comprising loss of cytochrome c oxidase activity, subsarcollemmal accumulation, and/or abnormal cristae, were present in 62%. Inflammation was found in 62%, seen as T lymphocytes and/or muscle fiber human leukocyte antigen ABC expression. In 75%, capillaries were affected, involving basal lamina and cells. In two patients, uncommon amounts of basal lamina were found, not only surrounding muscle fibers but also around nerves and capillaries.Conclusions: The wide variety of histological changes in this study suggests that skeletal muscles may be a major target of SARS‐CoV‐2, causing muscular post‐COVID‐19 symptoms. The mitochondrial changes, inflammation, and capillary injury in muscle biopsies can cause fatigue in part due to reduced energy supply. Because most patients had mild–moderate acute affection, the new variants that might cause less severe acute disease could still have the ability to cause long‐term myopathy.

1 July 2017 in Clinical Neurophysiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AJA.B. Jacobsen
A.B. Jacobsen
HBH. Bostock
H. Bostock
AFA. Fuglsang-Frederiksen
A. Fuglsang-Frederiksen
LDL. Duez
L. Duez
SBSándor Beniczky
Sándor Beniczky
HTHatice Tankisi
Hatice Tankisi

1 August 2021 in Clinical Neurophysiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JAJ. Agergaard
J. Agergaard
SLSteffen Leth
Steffen Leth
TPT.H. Pedersen
T.H. Pedersen
THT. Harbo
T. Harbo
JBJ.U. Blicher
J.U. Blicher
HTHatice Tankisi
Hatice Tankisi
To investigate the peripheral nerve and muscle function electrophysiologically in patients with persistent neuromuscular symptoms following Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Twenty consecutive patients from a Long-term COVID-19 Clinic referred to electrophysiological examination with the suspicion of mono- or polyneuropathy were included. Examinations were performed from 77 to 255 (median: 216) days after acute COVID-19. None of the patients had received treatment at the intensive care unit. Of these, 10 patients were not even hospitalized. Conventional nerve conduction studies (NCS) and quantitative electromyography (qEMG) findings from three muscles were compared with 20 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. qEMG showed myopathic changes in one or more muscles in 11 patients (55%). Motor unit potential duration was shorter in patients compared to healthy controls in biceps brachii (10.02±0.28 vs 11.75 ± 0.21), vastus medialis (10.86±0.37 vs 12.52±0.19) and anterior tibial (11.76±0.31 vs 13.26±0.21) muscles. All patients with myopathic qEMG reported about physical fatigue and 8 patients about myalgia while 3 patients without myopathic changes complained about physical fatigue. Long-term COVID-19 does not cause large fibre neuropathy, but myopathic changes are seen. Myopathy may be an important cause of physical fatigue in long-term COVID-19 even in non-hospitalized patients.

1 January 2019 in Clinical Neurophysiology Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HTHatice Tankisi
Hatice Tankisi
KPK. Pugdahl
K. Pugdahl
SBS. Beniczky
S. Beniczky
HAH. Andersen
H. Andersen
AFA. Fuglsang-Frederiksen
A. Fuglsang-Frederiksen
The purpose of this report is to recommend evidence-based strategies for polyneuropathy (PNP) electrodiagnosis based on a large cohort of patients examined prospectively. Nerve conduction studies (NCS) of bilateral tibial, peroneal and sural nerves, the latter with both near-nerve-technique (NNT) and surface recordings, were done in 313 patients with clinically suspected PNP. Bilateral dorsal sural and medial plantar nerves, and unilateral median and ulnar nerves were further examined in a subgroup of patients. The final clinical diagnosis retrieved from the patientś medical records 1-6 years after the neurophysiological investigation served as diagnostic reference standard. The clinical follow-up diagnosis confirmed PNP in 219 patients. The tibial nerve was the most sensitive nerve (75%), with prolonged tibial F-wave as the most sensitive parameter (72%). Sural NNT recordings were more sensitive (66%) than surface recordings (49%) (p < 0.05), however, dorsal sural (68%) and medial planter (70%) nerves had similar sensitivities as NNT. There was no side difference in the incidence of abnormality for any nerve. Based on these results, we recommend a strategy starting with tibial and sural NCS on one side for electrophysiological screening for distal symmetric PNP. If one of these is abnormal, we recommend examining the other lower and upper extremity nerves, including distal sensory nerves, particularly if NNT is not applicable. While one abnormal parameter is sufficient to interpret a nerve as abnormal, we recommend at least two abnormal nerves for PNP diagnosis, preferentially one being the sural nerve. We believe that the strategies recommended in this study may improve PNP electrodiagnosis.

1 August 2020 in Clinical Neurophysiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HTHatice Tankisi
Hatice Tankisi
ATA. Tankisi
A. Tankisi
THT. Harbo
T. Harbo
LML.K. Markvardsen
L.K. Markvardsen
HAH. Andersen
H. Andersen
TPT.H. Pedersen
T.H. Pedersen