Isabel Blanco

Prof. Isabel Blanco

Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2020 in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IBIsabel Blanco
Isabel Blanco
Olga Tura-CeideOlga Tura-Ceide
Olga Tura-Ceide
VPVictor Ivo Peinado
Victor Ivo Peinado
JBJoan Albert Barberà
Joan Albert Barberà
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a frequent and important complication of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It is associated with worse clinical courses with more frequent exacerbation episodes, shorter survival, and greater need of health resources. PH is usually of moderate severity and progresses slowly, without altering right ventricular function in the majority of cases. Nevertheless, a reduced subgroup of patients may present disproportionate PH, with pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) largely exceeding the severity of respiratory impairment. These patients may represent a group with an exaggerated vascular impairment (pulmonary vascular phenotype) to factors that induce PH in COPD or be patients in whom idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) coexist. The present review addresses the current definition and classification of PH in COPD, the distinction among the different phenotypes of pulmonary vascular disease that might present in COPD patients, and the therapeutic approach to PH in COPD based on the available scientific evidence.

19 October 2017 in Respiration
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TCTamara Del Corral
Tamara Del Corral
MIMaria Àngels Cebrià i Iranzo
Maria Àngels Cebrià i Iranzo
ILIbai López-de-Uralde-Villanueva
Ibai López-de-Uralde-Villanueva
RMRoberto Martínez-Alejos
Roberto Martínez-Alejos
IBIsabel Blanco
Isabel Blanco
JVJordi Vilaró
Jordi Vilaró
Background: Exercise-based rehabilitation is already a part of cystic fibrosis (CF) treatment; however, patient adherence is low. Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of a home exercise programme using active video games (AVGs) as a training modality for children and adolescents with CF. Methods: Thirty-nine children with CF were randomised to a control group (CG, n = 20, age 11 ± 6 years; FEV1 86.2 ± 20.5% of predicted) or a training group (AVGG, n = 19, age 13 ± 3 years; FEV1 82.7 ± 21.7% of predicted). The home training protocol consisted of 30- to 60-min sessions, 5 days/week, for 6 weeks using a Nintendo Wii™ platform. Exercise capacity was measured by the 6-min walk test (6MWT) and modified shuttle walk test (MSWT); muscular strength was estimated using the horizontal jump test (HJT), medicine ball throw (MBT), and hand grip strength (right [RHG]; left [LHG]); and quality of life was rated using the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R). All the children were measured at baseline, after rehabilitation, and at 12 months. Results: For the group × time interaction ANOVAs, the AVGG showed significant between-group differences in exercise capacity: 6MWT farthest walking distance, 38.4 m (p < 0.01); MSWT farthest walking distance, 78.4 m (p < 0.05); and muscular strength: HJT 9.8 cm, MBT 30.8 cm, RHG 7 kg, and LHG 6.5 kg (p < 0.01), before versus after intervention. The CFQ-R reported significantly higher scores on respiratory symptoms after the intervention and favoured the AVGG, and there was an improvement in other domains after 12 months. Adherence to the home exercise programme was 95% during the 6- week intervention period. Conclusion: A home-based programme using AVGs can effectively improve exercise capacity, muscular strength and quality of life in the short-term in children and adolescents with CF. The effects of training on muscle performance and quality of life were sustained over 12 months.

22 April 2022 in Respiration
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LPLucilla Piccari
Lucilla Piccari
SWStephen John Wort
Stephen John Wort
FMFederica Meloni
Federica Meloni
Monica RizzoMonica Rizzo
Monica Rizzo
LPLaura C. Price
Laura C. Price
OIon behalf of the REHAR Registry Investigators
on behalf of the REHAR Registry Investigators
Background: The impact of the new “borderline” hemodynamic class for pulmonary hypertension (PH) (mean pulmonary artery pressure [mPAP], 21–24 mm Hg and pulmonary vascular resistance, [PVR], ≥3 wood units, [WU]) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and interstitial lung disease (ILD) is unclear. Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of borderline PH (BLPH) on survival in COPD and ILD patients. Method: Survival was analyzed from retrospective data from 317 patients in 12 centers (Italy, Spain, UK) comparing four hemodynamic groups: the absence of PH (NoPH; mPAP <21 mm Hg or 21–24 mm Hg and PVR <3 WU), BLPH (mPAP 21–24 mm Hg and PVR ≥3 WU), mild-moderate PH (MPH; mPAP 25–35 mm Hg and cardiac index [CI] ≥2 L/min/m2), and severe PH (SPH; mPAP ≥35 mm Hg or mPAP ≥25 mm Hg and CI <2 L/min/m2). Results: BLPH affected 14% of patients; hemodynamic severity did not predict survival when COPD and ILD patients were analyzed together. However, survival in the ILD cohort for any PH level was worse than in NoPH (3-year survival: NoPH 58%, BLPH 32%, MPH 28%, SPH 33%, p = 0.002). In the COPD cohort, only SPH had reduced survival compared to the other groups (3-year survival: NoPH 82%, BLPH 86%, MPH 87%, SPH 57%, p = 0.005). The mortality risk correlated significantly with mPAP in ILD (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.776, 95% CI: 2.057–3.748, p < 0.001) and notably less in COPD patients (HR: 1.015, 95% CI: 1.003–1.027, p = 0.0146). Conclusions: In ILD, any level of PH portends worse survival, while in COPD, only SPH presents a worse outcome.

1 August 2020 in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LPLucilla Piccari
Lucilla Piccari
RPRoberto Del Pozo
Roberto Del Pozo
IBIsabel Blanco
Isabel Blanco
JGJessica García-Lucio
Jessica García-Lucio
YTYolanda Torralba
Yolanda Torralba
JBJoan Albert Barberà
Joan Albert Barberà
Introduction: In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), endothelial dysfunction and stiffness of systemic arteries may contribute to increased cardiovascular risk. Pulmonary vascular disease (PVD) is frequent in COPD. The association between PVD and systemic vascular dysfunction has not been thoroughly evaluated in COPD. Methods: A total of 108 subjects were allocated into four groups (non-smoking controls, smoking controls, COPD without PVD and COPD with PVD). In systemic arteries, endothelial dysfunction was assessed by flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and arterial stiffness by pulse wave analysis (PWA) and pulse wave velocity (PWV). PVD was defined by a mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) ≥ 25 mmHg at right heart catheterization or by a tricuspid regurgitation velocity > 2.8 m/s at doppler echocardiography. Biomarkers of inflammation and endothelial damage were assessed in peripheral blood. Results: FMD was lower in COPD patients, with or without PVD, compared to non-smoking controls; and in patients with COPD and PVD compared to smoking controls. PWV was higher in COPD with PVD patients compared to both non-smoking and smoking controls in a model adjusted by age and the Framingham score; PWV was also higher in patients with COPD and PVD compared to COPD without PVD patients in the non-adjusted analysis. FMD and PWV correlated significantly with forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and systolic PAP. FMD and PWV were correlated in all subjects. Discussion: We conclude that endothelial dysfunction of systemic arteries is common in COPD, irrespective if they have PVD or not. COPD patients with PVD show increased stiffness and greater impairment of endothelial function in systemic arteries. These findings suggest the association of vascular impairment in both pulmonary and systemic territories in a subset of COPD patients.

29 April 2021 in European Respiratory Review
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Rodrigo Torres-CastroRodrigo Torres-Castro
Rodrigo Torres-Castro
EGElena Gimeno-Santos
Elena Gimeno-Santos
JVJordi Vilaró
Jordi Vilaró
MRMarta Roqué-Figuls
Marta Roqué-Figuls
JMJorge Moisés
Jorge Moisés
IBIsabel Blanco
Isabel Blanco
Background: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a frequent complication in patients with COPD.Objective: To determine if, in patients with COPD, the presence of PH decreases exercise tolerance.Methods: We included studies that analysed exercise tolerance using a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) in patients with COPD with PH (COPD-PH) and without PH (COPD-nonPH). Two independent reviewers analysed the studies, extracted the data and assessed the quality of the evidence.Results: Of the 4915 articles initially identified, seven reported 257 patients with COPD-PH and 404 patients with COPD-nonPH. The COPD-PH group showed differences in peak oxygen consumption (V′O2peak), −3.09 mL·kg−1·min−1(95% CI −4.74 to −1.43, p=0.0003); maximum workload (Wmax), −20.5 W (95% CI −34.4 to −6.5, p=0.004); and oxygen pulse (O2pulse), −1.24 mL·beat−1(95% CI −2.40 to −0.09, p=0.03), in comparison to the group with COPD-nonPH. If we excluded studies with lung transplant candidates, the sensitivity analyses showed even bigger differences:V′O2, −4.26 mL·min−1·kg−1(95% CI −5.50 to −3.02 mL·kg−1·min−1, p<0.00001); Wmax, −26.6 W (95% CI −32.1 to −21.1 W, p<0.00001); and O2pulse, −2.04 mL·beat−1(95% CI −2.92 to −1.15 mL·beat−1, p<0.0001).Conclusion: Exercise tolerance was significantly lower in patients with COPD-PH than in patients with COPD-nonPH, particularly in nontransplant candidates.

23 February 2023 in Life
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Rodrigo Torres-CastroRodrigo Torres-Castro
Rodrigo Torres-Castro
Rodrigo Núñez-CortésRodrigo Núñez-Cortés
Rodrigo Núñez-Cortés
SLSantiago Larrateguy
Santiago Larrateguy
XRXavier Alsina Restoy
Xavier Alsina Restoy
JBJoan Albert Barberà
Joan Albert Barberà
IBIsabel Blanco
Isabel Blanco
There is a wide range of sequelae affecting COVID-19 survivors, including impaired physical capacity. These sequelae can affect the quality of life and return to work of the active population. Therefore, one of the pillars of following-up is the evaluation of physical capacity, which can be assessed with field tests (such as the six-minute walk test, the one-minute standing test, the Chester step test, and the shuttle walking test) or laboratory tests (such as the cardiopulmonary exercise test). These tests can be performed in different contexts and have amply demonstrated their usefulness in the assessment of physical capacity both in post-COVID-19 patients and in other chronic respiratory, metabolic, cardiologic, or neurologic diseases. However, when traditional tests cannot be performed, physical function can be a good substitute, especially for assessing the effects of an intervention. For example, the Short Physical Performance Battery assessment and the Timed Up and Go assessment are widely accepted in older adults. Thus, the test should be chosen according to the characteristics of each subject.