Nathan J McDannold

Dr. Nathan J McDannold


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 July 2012 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NMNathan J McDannold
Nathan J McDannold
CACostas D. Arvanitis
Costas D. Arvanitis
NVNatalia Vykhodtseva
Natalia Vykhodtseva
MLMargaret S. Livingstone
Margaret S. Livingstone
The blood–brain barrier (BBB) prevents entry of most drugs into the brain and is a major hurdle to the use of drugs for brain tumors and other central nervous system disorders. Work in small animals has shown that ultrasound combined with an intravenously circulating microbubble agent can temporarily permeabilize the BBB. Here, we evaluated whether this targeted drug delivery method can be applied safely, reliably, and in a controlled manner on rhesus macaques using a focused ultrasound system. We identified a clear safety window during which BBB disruption could be produced without evident tissue damage, and the acoustic pressure amplitude where the probability for BBB disruption was 50% and was found to be half of the value that would produce tissue damage. Acoustic emission measurements seem promising for predicting BBB disruption and damage. In addition, we conducted repeated BBB disruption to central visual field targets over several weeks in animals trained to conduct complex visual acuity tasks. All animals recovered from each session without behavioral deficits, visual deficits, or loss in visual acuity. Together, our findings show that BBB disruption can be reliably and repeatedly produced without evident histologic or functional damage in a clinically relevant animal model using a clinical device. These results therefore support clinical testing of this noninvasive-targeted drug delivery method. Cancer Res; 72(14); 3652–63. ©2012 AACR.

1 February 2010 in Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NMNathan J McDannold
Nathan J McDannold
GCGreg T. Clement
Greg T. Clement
PBPeter Black
Peter Black
FJFerenc Jolesz
Ferenc Jolesz
KHKullervo Hynynen
Kullervo Hynynen
OBJECTIVE. This work evaluated the clinical feasibility of transcranial magnetic resonance imaging–guided focused ultrasound surgery.METHODS. Transcrani

1 July 2008 in Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NSNickolai Sheikov
Nickolai Sheikov
NMNathan J McDannold
Nathan J McDannold
SSShipra Sharma
Shipra Sharma
KHKullervo Hynynen
Kullervo Hynynen

1 June 2014 in Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MAMuna Aryal
Muna Aryal
CACostas D. Arvanitis
Costas D. Arvanitis
PAPhillip M. Alexander
Phillip M. Alexander
NMNathan J McDannold
Nathan J McDannold

25 January 2006 in Physics in Medicine & Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NMNathan J McDannold
Nathan J McDannold
NVN Vykhodtseva
N Vykhodtseva
KHK Hynynen
K Hynynen
Acoustic emission was monitored during focused ultrasound exposures in conjunction with an ultrasound contrast agent (Optison) in order to determine if cavitation activity is associated with the induction of blood-brain barrier disruption (BBBD). Thirty-four locations were sonicated (frequency: 260 kHz) at targets 10 mm deep in rabbit brain (N = 9). The sonications were applied at peak pressure amplitudes ranging from 0.11 to 0.57 MPa (burst length: 10 ms; repetition frequency of 1 Hz; duration: 20 s). Acoustic emission was recorded with a focused passive cavitation detector. This emission was recorded at each location during sonications with and without Optison. Detectable wideband acoustic emission was observed only at 0.40 and 0.57 MPa. BBBD was observed in contrast MRI after sonication at 0.29-0.57 MPa. The appearance of small regions of extravasated erythrocytes appeared to be associated with this wideband emission signal. The results thus suggest that BBBD resulting from focused ultrasound pulses in the presence of Optison can occur without indicators for inertial cavitation in vivo, wideband emission and extravasation. If inertial cavitation is not responsible for the BBBD, other ultrasound/microbubble interactions are likely the source. A significant increase in the emission signal due to Optison at the second and third harmonics of the ultrasound driving frequency was found to correlate with BBBD and might be useful as an online method to indicate when the disruption occurs.

1 November 2005 in Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NMNathan J McDannold
Nathan J McDannold
NVNatalia Vykhodtseva
Natalia Vykhodtseva
SRScott Raymond
Scott Raymond
FJFerenc A. Jolesz
Ferenc A. Jolesz
KHKullervo Hynynen
Kullervo Hynynen