Renan Machry

Dr. Renan Machry


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 September 2022 in Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RMRenan Machry
Renan Machry
KDKiara Serafini Dapieve
Kiara Serafini Dapieve
ACAna Carolina Cadore-Rodrigues
Ana Carolina Cadore-Rodrigues
AWArie Werner
Arie Werner
NJNiek de Jager
Niek de Jager
CKCornelis J Kleverlaan
Cornelis J Kleverlaan

1 April 2020 in Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KDKiara Serafini Dapieve
Kiara Serafini Dapieve
RMRenan Machry
Renan Machry
Rafaela Oliveira PileccoRafaela Oliveira Pilecco
Rafaela Oliveira Pilecco
CKCornelis J Kleverlaan
Cornelis J Kleverlaan
Gabriel Kalil Rocha PereiraGabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira
Gabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira
LVLuiz Felipe Valandro
Luiz Felipe Valandro

6 December 2022 in Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LVLuiz Felipe Valandro
Luiz Felipe Valandro
ACAna Carolina Cadore-Rodrigues
Ana Carolina Cadore-Rodrigues
KDKiara Serafini Dapieve
Kiara Serafini Dapieve
RMRenan Machry
Renan Machry
Gabriel Kalil Rocha PereiraGabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira
Gabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira


1 May 2021 in Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RMRenan Machry
Renan Machry
Alexandre BorgesAlexandre Borges
Alexandre Borges
Gabriel Kalil Rocha PereiraGabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira
Gabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira
CKCornelis J Kleverlaan
Cornelis J Kleverlaan
AVAndressa Borin Venturini
Andressa Borin Venturini
LVLuiz Felipe Valandro
Luiz Felipe Valandro

18 April 2024 in Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Rafaela Oliveira PileccoRafaela Oliveira Pilecco
Rafaela Oliveira Pilecco
LRLucas Saldanha da Rosa
Lucas Saldanha da Rosa
ABAndrea Baldi
Andrea Baldi
RMRenan Machry
Renan Machry
João Paulo Mendes TribstJoão Paulo Mendes Tribst
João Paulo Mendes Tribst
Gabriel Kalil Rocha PereiraGabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira
Gabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira
The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of the combinations of two different intraoral scanners (IOS), two milling machines, and two restorative materials on the marginal/internal fit and fatigue behavior of endocrowns produced by CAD-CAM. Eight groups (n= 10) were considered through the combination of TRIOS 3 (TR) or Primescan (PS) IOS; 4-axes (CR; CEREC MC XL) or 5-axes (PM; PrograMill PM7) milling machines; and lithium disilicate (LD; IPS e.max CAD) or resin composite (RC; Tetric CAD) restorative materials. Specific surface treatments were applied to each material, and the bonding to its corresponding Endocrown-shaped fiberglass-reinforced epoxy resin preparations was performed (Variolink Esthetic DC). Computed microtomography (μCT) was performed to assess the marginal/internal fit, as well as a mechanical fatigue test (20 Hz, initial load = 100 N/5000 cycles; step-size = 50 N/10,000 cycles until a threshold of 1500 N, then, the step-size was increased if needed to 100 N/10,000 cycles until failure or a threshold of 2800 N) to evaluate the restorations long-term behavior. Complementary analysis of the fracture features and surface topography in scanning electron microscopy was performed. Three-way ANOVA and Kaplan-Meier test (α = 0.05) were performed for marginal/internal fit, and fatigue behavior data, respectively. PS scanner, CR milling machine, and RC endocrowns resulted in a better marginal fit compared to their counterparts. Still, the PM machine resulted in a better pulpal space fit compared to the CR milling machine. Regardless of the scanner and milling machine, RC endocrowns exhibited superior fatigue behavior than LD ones. LD endocrowns presented margin chipping regardless of the milling machine used. Despite minor differences in terms of fit, the 'IOS' and 'milling machine' factors did not impair the fatigue behavior of endocrowns. Resin-composite restorations resulted in a higher survival rate compared to glass-ceramic ones, independently of the digital devices used in the workflow.