Various studies have suggested the possible cardiovascular (CV) protective effects of the pneumococcal vaccine (PV). Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the association between recipients of PV with mortality and CV outcomes among patients with and without established cardiovascular disease. We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus for studies evaluating the effect of PV on mortality and CV outcomes. A total of 15 studies with 347,444 patients were included in the meta-analysis: 111,784 patients received PV (32%) and 235,660 patients were in the unvaccinated group (68%). Recipients of PV were associated with decreased all-cause mortality (HR, 0.76 (95% CI: 0.66 to 0.87), p < 0.001). PV was associated with a decrease in the incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) (HR, 0.73 (95% CI: 0.56–0.96), p = 0.02), without significant reduction in CV mortality (HR, 0.87 (95% CI: 0.72–1.07), p = 0.18) and stroke (HR, 1.01 (95% CI: 0.93–1.10), p = 0.82). Our study found PV was associated with decreased risk of all-cause mortality and MI. Future RCTs will be necessary to confirm benefits associated with receipt of PV.

The prevalence, incidence, and characteristics of bacterial infections in patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 are not well understood and have been raised as an important knowledge gap. Therefore, our study focused on the most common opportunistic infections/secondary infections/superinfections in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Eligible studies were identified using PubMed/Medline since inception to June 25, 2021. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were selected. Statistical analysis was conducted in Review Manager 5.4.1. A random-effect model was used when heterogeneity was seen to pool the studies, and the result was reported as inverse variance and the corresponding 95% confidence interval. We screened 701 articles comprising 22 cohort studies which were included for analysis. The pooled prevalence of opportunistic infections/secondary infections/superinfections was 16% in COVID-19 patients. The highest prevalence of secondary infections was observed among viruses at 33%, followed by bacteria at 16%, fungi at 6%, and 25% among the miscellaneous group/wrong outcome. Opportunistic infections are more prevalent in critically ill patients. The isolated pathogens included Epstein-Barr virus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Acinetobacter baumannii, Hemophilus influenza, and invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Large-scale studies are required to better identify opportunistic/secondary/superinfections in COVID-19 patients.

Background: Inflammation plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of both acute and chronic heart failure. Recent studies showed that the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) could be related to adverse outcomes in patients with cardiovascular diseases. We sought to evaluate whether NLR could predict mortality in patients with acute heart failure by means of a meta-analysis. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases through January 2023 for studies evaluating the association of NLR with mortality in patients with acute heart failure. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and long-term all-cause mortality. Endpoints were pooled using a random-effects DerSimonian-and-Laird model and were expressed as a hazard ratio (HR) or mean difference (MD) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Results: A total of 15 studies with 15,995 patients with acute heart failure were included in the final study. Stratifying patients based on a cut-off NLR, we found that high NLR was associated with a significantly higher in-hospital mortality [HR 1.54, 95% CI (1.18–2.00), p < 0.001] and long-term all-cause mortality [HR 1.61, 95% CI (1.40–1.86), p < 0.001] compared to the low-NLR group. Comparing the highest against the lowest NLR quartile, it was shown that patients in the highest NLR quartile has a significantly heightened risk of long-term all-cause mortality [HR 1.77, 95% CI (1.38–2.26), p < 0.001] compared to that of lowest NLR quartile. However, the risks of in-hospital mortality were compared between both quartiles of patients [HR 1.78, 95% CI (0.91–3.47), p = 0.09]. Lastly, NLR values were significantly elevated among non-survivors compared to survivors during index hospitalization [MD 5.07, 95% CI (3.34–6.80), p < 0.001] and during the follow-up period [MD 1.06, 95% CI (0.54–1.57), p < 0.001]. Conclusions: Elevated NLR was associated with an increased risk of short- and long-term mortality and could be a useful tool or incorporated in the risk stratification in patients with acute heart failure.

Background: Despite intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) being used for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) for over two decades, its accessibility remains limited in various regions of the world. The Asian region, which experiences the highest age-standardized incidence of AIS, currently lacks comprehensive data on the utilization of IVT. Aims: This study aimed to provide precise estimates of IVT usage for AIS in Asian countries. Methods: A literature search was conducted on PubMed and Google using appropriate search terms. English language, peer reviewed articles published after 2010 were included in the analysis. The pooled proportion was calculated utilizing the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model. Additionally, a subgroup analysis was conducted, taking into account factors such as the study's country, the economic status of the country, specific Asian regions, publication year (before 2015 and from 2015 onwards), study location, study setting, hospital stroke protocol, and national stroke guidelines. Results: 67 observational studies with 778,046 patients with AIS were included in the meta-analysis. The overall utilization rate of IVT was found to be 9.1%. High-income countries had a higher rate (11.3%) compared to lower-middle-income (8.1%) and upper-middle-income countries (9%). Central and North Asia had the highest rate (17.5%) and Southeast Asia had the lowest rate (6.8%). Studies conducted after 2015 had a higher thrombolysis rate (11.3%) compared to those before 2015 (1.5%). Presence of hospital stroke protocols (10.7%) and national stroke guidelines (10.1%) were associated with higher thrombolysis rates. Conclusion: The overall utilization rate of IVT for AIS in Asia stood at 9.1%, showcasing noteworthy disparities across countries, regions, and income brackets. To improve thrombolysis rates in the region, addressing prehospital delays, increasing public awareness, and implementing stroke protocols and national guidelines are key strategies.

Background: Although myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is more common in women, it is unknown whether sex is a risk factor for adverse outcomes in patients with MINOCA. We aimed to investigate the relationship between sex differences and outcomes of patients with MINOCA. Methods and Results: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from their inception until August 2023 for relevant studies. End points were pooled using the Hartung–Knapp–Sidik–Jonkman random‐effects model as odds ratio (OR) with 95% CIs. Nine studies, involving 30 281 patients with MINOCA (comprising 18 079 women and 12 202 men), were included in the study. Women were older and had a higher prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and stroke compared with men. The median duration of follow‐up was 3.5 years, with an interquartile range of 2.2 to 4.2 years. Pooled analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in the risk of all‐cause mortality (OR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.87–1.22]), major adverse cardiovascular events (OR, 1.18 [95% CI, 0.89–1.58]), heart failure (OR, 1.32 [95% CI, 0.57–3.03]), stroke (OR, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.56–2.26]), and myocardial infarction (OR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.29–3.76]) between the 2 groups. Regarding short‐term outcomes, women had a significantly higher risk of in‐hospital major adverse cardiovascular events compared with men (OR, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.16–1.53]) whereas there was no significant difference in the risk of in‐hospital mortality (OR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.64–1.28]) between the 2 patient groups. Conclusions: Despite the differences in demographics and comorbidity profiles, there was no significant difference in the long‐term outcomes for patients with MINOCA between sexes. However, it is noteworthy that women experienced a higher risk of in‐hospital major adverse cardiovascular events compared with men.

Background: Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been recommended in the practice guidelines for the treatment of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; however, their effects among patients with preserved ejection fraction have been debatable. Objective: We aim to evaluate the SGLT2 inhibitor effect among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, including DELIVER and EMPEROR-Preserved trials. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search using the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane libraries for relevant articles from inception until August 30th, 2022. Statistical analysis was performed by calculating hazard ratio (HR) using the random effect model with a 95% confidence interval (CI) and probability value (P). Statistical significance was met if 95% CI does not cross numeric “1” and P < .05. Results: Six studies with a total of 15,989 total patients were included in the final analysis. The mean age of patients enrolled in SGLT2 inhibitors and placebo was 69.13 and 69.37 years, respectively. The median follow-up duration was 2.24 years. SGLT2 inhibitors reduced composite cardiovascular mortality or first hospitalization for heart failure (HR, 0.80 [95% CI: 0.74–0.87], P < .001, I ² = 0%), heart failure hospitalization (HR, 0.74 [95% CI: 0.67–0.82], P < .001, I ² = 0%) compared with placebo. However, all-cause mortality (HR, 0.97 [95% CI: 0.89–1.06], P = .54, I ² = 0%) and cardiovascular mortality (HR, 0.96 [95% CI: 0.82–1.13), P = .66, I ² = 35.09%] were comparable between both groups. Conclusion: Our study finding shows that SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of first HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization; however, all-cause mortality was comparable between the groups.