Rudy Hidayat, M.D., Ph.D., Faisal Parlindungan, M.D., Jihan Izzatun Nisa, M.D., Arya Ivan Mahendra, M.D., Muhammad Izza Indika, M.D., Cristopher Efendi, M.D.. J Rheum Dis -0001;0:. https://doi.org/10.4078/jrd.2024.0062

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affects health care services. Our aim was to assess health care disruptions, treatment interruptions, and telemedicine reception regarding autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) in Indonesia. Method: A cross-sectional population online-based questionnaire was conducted in Indonesia from September to December 2021. Results: A total of 311 ARD patients were included, of whom 81 (26.0%) underwent consultations via telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic. The respondents showed increased concern about their susceptibility to COVID-19 (score of 3.9/5). Approximately 81 (26.0%) avoided hospital visits, and 76 (24.4%) stopped taking the medication without medical advice. Respondents’ concerns correlated with their social distancing behaviors (p value 0.000, r 0.458). Respondent concerns, behaviors, and blocked access to the hospital during the pandemic were associated with avoiding hospital visits (p value 0.014; 0.001; 0.045; 0.008). Sex was associated with stopping medication (p value 0.005). In multivariate analysis, blocked access and sex remained significant. Approximately 81 (26%) respondents who used telemedicine services during the COVID-19 pandemic as an alternative medical consultation method showed high satisfaction (3.8/5). Conclusion: Health care disruptions and treatment interruptions were affected by patients’ internal and external factors during the COVID-19 pandemic. Telemedicine may be the best option to address barriers to health care access in Indonesia’s rheumatology practice during and after the pandemic situation.

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients have a greater prevalence of anxiety and depression. Proinflammatory cytokines are elevated in RA. We aim to evaluate the association between systemic inflammation in RA and anxiety and depression. Methods: There were 31 RA patients, 16 with active disease activity and 15 in remission state; they were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and for RA disease activity using Disease Activity Score of 28 joints (DAS28) – CRP (C-reactive protein). Serum proinflammatory cytokines were measured, including interleukin (IL)-6, IL-17, and Tumour Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α). Results: Among 31 patients, ten patients showed anxiety symptoms, 19 patients showed depression symptoms, and two displayed mixed symptoms. Serum TNF-α levels were significantly higher in active disease than in the remission group (p-value 0.006). There was no association or correlation between proinflammatory cytokines to anxiety and depression symptoms in the active disease and remission groups. Conclusion: This suggests that other factors besides disease activity and state of systemic inflammation may cause anxiety and depression in RA patients.

Methotrexate (MTX) remains the recommended first-line treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA); however, its response varies and is influenced by various factors. This study aimed to identify predictors of MTX monotherapy treatment success in an Indonesian cohort. This retrospective cohort study included newly diagnosed RA patients receiving MTX monotherapy. Treatment success was defined as achieving remission or low disease activity according to Disease Activity Score-28 with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) after 12 months of MTX therapy. The association between demographic, clinical, and laboratory factors and achieving therapy targets was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Among 254 subjects, 59.4% achieved treatment success with MTX monotherapy, with remission attained in 33% and low disease activity in 26.4%. Most subjects were female (95.7%) with a mean age of 48 ± 11 years. Multivariate analysis revealed that lower disease activity (OR 1.97; 95% CI [1.04–3.72]), normal ESR (OR 2.58; 95% CI [1.05–6.34]), normoweight (OR 2.55, 95% CI [1.45–4.49]), and tender joint count ≤ 5 (OR 2.45, 95% CI [1.31–4.58]) were significant predictors of treatment success. The rate of MTX monotherapy success in our study was 59.4%. Lower disease activity, normal ESR, normoweight, and fewer tender joints at baseline were significant predictors of treatment success.