The aim of the current study was to evaluate the influence of severe radiation-induced lymphopenia (RIL) on the outcomes of esophageal cancer (EC). A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed through the PRISMA guideline. Seventeen studies were included in the current systematic review, with eight included in the meta-analyses. Meta-analyses found that severe RIL was associated with lower pathologic complete response (pCR) rate (odds ratio (OR) = 0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.30–0.66, I² = 0%), inferior overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.29–1.75, I² = 6%), and worse progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.39–2.07, I² = 0%) of EC patients. The lymphocyte nadir was found during 4–6 weeks after the start of radiotherapy. The leading dosimetric factors associated with severe RIL included larger PTV, higher dose to heart and body, and higher effective dose to the immune cells (EDIC). Clinical risk factors for RIL mainly comprised lower baseline ALC, higher tumor length and clinical stage, and distal EC. In conclusion, severe RIL might be associated with a lower pCR rate and worse OS and PFS of EC patients. Minimizing the dosimetric risk factors, especially in patients with clinical risk factors, might benefit their outcomes.

The aim of our study was to perform a comprehensive analysis of the gene expression, copy number variation (CNV) and mutation of key mitophagy genes in the progression and prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). We obtained the data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Clustering analysis was performed to stratify the mitophagy related groups. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) based cox model was used to select hub survival genes. An independent validation cohort was retrieved from Gene Expression Omnibus database. We found 24 out of 27 mitophagy genes were aberrantly expressed between tumor and normal samples. CNV gains were associated with higher expression of mitophagy genes in 23 of 27 mitophagy genes. The clustering analysis identified high and low risk mitophagy groups with distinct survival differences. The high risk mitophagy groups had higher tumor mutation burden, stemness phenotype, total CNVs and lower CD4+ T cells infiltration. Drugs targeted to high risk mitophagy groups were identified including the PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitor, HDAC inhibitor and chemotherapy agents such as cisplatin and gemcitabine. In addition, the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified between mitophagy groups. Further univariate Cox analysis of each DEG and subsequent LASSO-based Cox model revealed a mitophagy-related prognostic signature. The risk score model of this signature showed a strong ability to predict the overall survival of LUAD patients in training and validation datasets. In conclusion, the mitophagy genes played an important role in the progression and prognosis of LUAD, which might provide useful information for the treatment of LUAD.

Aim: The aim of this study was to assess whether rs1333049 was associated with coronary heart disease (CHD) in Han Chinese. Methods: This case-control study was involved with 599 CHD patients and 591 non-CHD controls. Meanwhile, a comprehensive meta-analysis was also conducted to establish the contribution of rs1333049 to CHD. Results: Our results showed that rs1333049 increased the risk of CHD by 38% (OR=1.38, 95% CI=1.18-1.62). A breakdown analysis by gender further indicated that rs1333049 increased the risk of CHD in men by 29% (OR=1.29, 95% CI=1.05-1.58) and in women by 64% (OR=1.64, 95% CI=1.25-2.16). A follow-up subgroup analysis by age showed there was a significant association between rs1333049 and CHD in women younger than 65 (≤55 years: p=0.001, 55-65 years: p=0.008) and in men aged between 55 and 65 years (p=0.005). Our meta-analysis was involved with 21 studies (25 stages) among 20969 cases and 34114 controls. Our results showed that rs1333049 led to a significantly increased risk of CHD (OR=1.30, 95% CI=1.21-1.39). Further subgroup analyses by ethnicity showed rs1333049 increased the CHD risk by 30% in Europeans (OR=1.30, 95% CI=1.16-1.47) and 27% in Asians (OR=1.27, 95% CI=1.22-1.33). Conclusions: Our case-control study and meta-analysis suggest that rs1333049 is a useful risk marker of CHD.