Hang Zhi Hu

Mr. Hang Zhi Hu

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 February 2022 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XWXuesong Wang
Xuesong Wang
GLGuo Lianjun
Guo Lianjun
ZXZhenyang Xu
Zhenyang Xu
JWJunxiang Wang
Junxiang Wang
DDDing Deng
Ding Deng
HHHang Zhi Hu
Hang Zhi Hu
Rock failure phenomena are accompanied by abundant energy variation, and the energy dissipation can explain the dynamic mechanical characteristics of the rock. In this study, a series of granite specimens (a total of 60) with different aspect ratios were dynamically loaded by a split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) to explain the energy dissipation and the rock-crushing degree under dynamic load. A new index, namely energy time density (wtd), is proposed to evaluate the energy dissipation considering the time factor. The relationships between strain rate, energy time density, and specific energy absorption are analyzed. A metric (Ku) is defined to describe the degree of rock fragmentation quantitatively. The correlations of fractal dimension and Ku with different impact pressures are compared. It was concluded that there is a noticeable peak point in the energy time density curve. The energy time density of the stress equilibrium point is three times that of the peak point. The energy time density declines after the peak point, then the energy consumption density tends to be stable. The linear relationship between strain rate and peak point energy time density is stronger. The new index can describe energy dissipation well under dynamic loading. In addition, the experimental results indicate that the degree of crush Ku can describe the degree of crush, and the effect of fractal dimension to quantify the fracture characteristics of the rocks is less good in this test. The crushing degree of rocks increases with the increase of strain rate. Furthermore, the prediction effect of energy time density is better than that of strain rate about Ku.

16 June 2022 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZXZhenyang Xu
Zhenyang Xu
YWyixuan wu
yixuan wu
XLXin Liu
Xin Liu
GLGuo Lianjun
Guo Lianjun
HHHang Zhi Hu
Hang Zhi Hu
Stress equilibrium time is an important index to judge the homogeneity of rocks. In order to study the relationship between stress equilibrium time and crushing energy consumption before rock destruction, Hopkinson tests were conducted on granite specimens with different length-to-diameter ratios. In this paper, by studying the size and strain rate effects of rocks, five different sizes of granite specimens with different aspect ratios were prepared and Hopkinson impact tests were conducted under four strain rate conditions. Data analysis and processing using the three-wave method to investigate the stress uniformity of granite specimens under impact loading. The energy balance factor was introduced to compare and analyze the stress equilibrium time of five kinds of long-diameter granite specimens, and it was found that the stress equilibrium time of rocks with the same length–diameter ratio decreased with the increase of loading strain rate, while the granite specimens with length–diameter ratio of 0.8 showed a better stress equilibrium time. In order to better find the aspect ratio and loading strain rate that can crush better and maintain a long equilibrium time, the energy consumption of rock crushing is further analyzed. The energy dissipation of granite specimens with loading strain rate of 156.8 s−1 and 253.2 s−1 was found to be more concentrated, and the energy dissipation rate was stable at about 48%. Subsequently, the relationship between stress equilibrium time and energy dissipation was established, and it was proved that the fastest growing time period of the energy dissipation curve was approximately equal to the rock stress equilibrium time, while the length-to-diameter ratio of the granite specimen that could better maintain the stress uniformity before rock crushing was 0.8 and the loading strain rate was 156.8 s−1.