Eleftheria Ztriva

Mrs. Eleftheria Ztriva

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2024 in Life
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GAGeorgios Anogianakis
Georgios Anogianakis
SDStylianos Daios
Stylianos Daios
NTNikolaos Topouzis
Nikolaos Topouzis
KBKonstantinos Barmpagiannos
Konstantinos Barmpagiannos
CKChristos Kaiafa
Christos Kaiafa
Christos SavopoulosChristos Savopoulos
Christos Savopoulos
Stroke is the third leading cause of death in the developed world and a major cause of chronic disability, especially among the elderly population. The major biomarkers of stroke which are the most promising for predicting onset time and independently differentiating ischemic from hemorrhagic and other stroke subtypes are at present limited to a few. This review aims to emphasize on the prognostic role of S100 calcium-binding protein b (S100B), and Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) in patients with stroke. An electronic search of the published research from January 2000 to February 2024 was conducted using the MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. The implementation of S100B and GFAP in existing clinical scales and imaging modalities may be used to improve diagnostic accuracy and realize the potential of blood biomarkers in clinical practice. The reviewed studies highlight the potential of S100B and GFAP as significant biomarkers in the prognosis and diagnosis of patients with stroke and their ability of predicting long-term neurological deficits. They demonstrate high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating between ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke and they correlate well with stroke severity and outcomes. Several studies also emphasize on the early elevation of these biomarkers post-stroke onset, underscoring their value in early diagnosis and risk stratification. The ongoing research in this field should aim at improving patient outcomes and reducing stroke-related morbidity and mortality by developing a reliable, non-invasive diagnostic tool that can be easily implemented in several healthcare settings, with the ultimate goal of improving stroke management.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MMMichail Makris
Michail Makris
Eleni GavriilakiEleni Gavriilaki
Eleni Gavriilaki
EZEleftheria Ztriva
Eleftheria Ztriva
Paschalis EvangelidisPaschalis Evangelidis
Paschalis Evangelidis
ELElmina Lefkou
Elmina Lefkou
GKGeorgia Kaiafa
Georgia Kaiafa
Background: In this prospective study, the prognostic role of ADAMTS13 activity and von Willebrand (VWF) antigen (VWF: Ag) levels in ischemic stroke outcomes was investigated. Methods: Patients diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke were prospectively enrolled in this study, while samples for ADAMTS13 activity and VWF: Ag level measurements were collected upon their admission to our unit. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was estimated upon admission and at discharge. The modified Rankin scale for neurologic disability (Rankin) score was estimated based on the patient’s history before the stroke onset, during admission (RankinAdm), and at discharge (RankinDis). Results: In the study, 29 patients with a median age of 82.5 (51, 92) were included. In univariate analysis, ADAMTS13 activity during admission was associated with platelet values at the same time point (r = 0.12, p = 0.01) and VWF: Ag levels were associated with age (r = 0.439, p = 0.04), previous ischemic stroke (r = 0.9176, p = 0.031), and glucose levels (r = 0.64, p = 0.049). Associations between ADAMTS13/VWF: Ag Ratio with RankinDis (r = 0.3253, p = 0.03), and the change between RankinDis and RankinAdm (r = 0.1589, p = 0.014) were identified. Additionally, VWF: Ag levels during admission were correlated with RankinDis (r = 0.0072, p = 0.049). Conclusions: These markers might be useful as biomarkers for the prediction of poor outcomes after stroke.

15 December 2022 in Medicina
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Eleni KarlaftiEleni Karlafti
Eleni Karlafti
Daniel ParamythiotisDaniel Paramythiotis
Daniel Paramythiotis
KPKonstantina Pantazi
Konstantina Pantazi
Vasiliki Epameinondas GeorgakopoulouVasiliki Epameinondas Georgakopoulou
Vasiliki Epameinondas Georgakopoulou
CKChristos Kaiafa
Christos Kaiafa
Christos SavopoulosChristos Savopoulos
Christos Savopoulos
In the last few years, the world has had to face the SARS-CoV-2 infection and its multiple effects. Even though COVID-19 was first considered to be a respiratory disease, it has an extended clinical spectrum with symptoms occurring in many tissues, and it is now identified as a systematic disease. Therefore, various drugs are used during the therapy of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Studies have shown that many of these drugs could have adverse side-effects, including drug-induced liver injury—also known as DILI—which is the focus of our review. Despite the consistent findings, the pathophysiological mechanism behind DILI in COVID-19 disease is still complex, and there are a few risk factors related to it. However, when it comes to the diagnosis, there are specific algorithms (including the RUCAM algorithm) and biomarkers that can assist in identifying DILI and which we will analyze in our review. As indicated by the title, a variety of drugs are associated with this COVID-19-related complication, including systemic corticosteroids, drugs used for the therapy of uncontrolled cytokine storm, as well as antiviral, anti-inflammatory, and anticoagulant drugs. Bearing in mind that hepatotoxicity is very likely to occur during COVID-19, especially in patients treated with multiple medications, we will also refer to the use of other drugs used for DILI therapy in an effort to control and prevent a severe and long-term outcome.

20 October 2022 in Life
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CKChristos Kaiafa
Christos Kaiafa
Christos SavopoulosChristos Savopoulos
Christos Savopoulos
Eleni KarlaftiEleni Karlafti
Eleni Karlafti
KPKonstantina Pantazi
Konstantina Pantazi
Daniel ParamythiotisDaniel Paramythiotis
Daniel Paramythiotis
TDTriantafyllos Didangelos
Triantafyllos Didangelos
Coronavirus disease is a viral infection that can affect multiple systems and be expressed with many—or no—symptoms. The viral infection begins when the virus binds to the host’s receptor and from that point on, it is transmitted to the rest of the body, where it causes inflammatory reactions. Among other tissues and systems, SARS-CoV-2 impacts the coagulation system, where it triggers the immunothrombotic response. Its effects are rather intense and can lead to many complications. COVID-19-associated coagulopathy is frequently observed in hospitalized patients, especially ICU patients, and can be proven detrimental. It is usually accompanied by other complications, such as sepsis-induced coagulopathy, disseminated intravascular coagulation and venous thromboembolism. Since all these conditions lead to poor prognosis for severely ill patients, thromboprophylaxis and coagulopathy prognosis are just as important as the therapeutic handling of these patients. Since the beginning of the pandemic, many biomarkers have been considered useful when trying to assess the thrombotic risk of hospitalized patients or evaluate the severity of their situation. At the same time, many drugs have already been tested—while others are still being trialed—in order to find the optimal therapy for each urgent situation.

31 August 2022 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EZEleftheria Ztriva
Eleftheria Ztriva
APAdonis A Protopapas
Adonis A Protopapas
PMPavlos Mentizis
Pavlos Mentizis
APAnastasios Papadopoulos
Anastasios Papadopoulos
CGChristiana Gogou
Christiana Gogou
Konstantinos TziomalosKonstantinos Tziomalos
Konstantinos Tziomalos
Background: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, particularly in the presence of hepatic fibrosis, is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events, including ischemic stroke. However, it is unclear whether hepatic fibrosis is associated with the severity and outcome of acute ischemic stroke. Aim: To evaluate the relationship between hepatic fibrosis and the severity at admission and in-hospital outcome of acute ischemic stroke. Patients and methods: We prospectively studied all patients who were admitted to our department with acute ischemic stroke between September 2010 and February 2018 (n = 1107; 42.1% males, age 79.8 ± 7.2 years). The severity of stroke was assessed at admission with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Severe stroke was defined as NIHSS ≥ 21. The presence of hepatic fibrosis was evaluated with the Fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4). The outcome was assessed with dependency at discharge (modified Rankin Scale between 2 and 5) and with in-hospital mortality. Results: Patients with severe stroke had a higher FIB-4 index than patients with non-severe stroke (2.7 ± 1.7 and 2.3 ± 1.4, respectively; p < 0.05). Independent risk factors for severe IS were age (relative risk (RR) 1.064, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.030–1.100, p < 0.001), female sex (RR 1.723, 95% CI 1.100–2.698, p = 0.012), atrial fibrillation (RR 1.869, 95% CI 1.234–2.831, p = 0.002), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (RR 1.019, 95% CI 1.006–1.033, p = 0.001), and the FIB-4 index (RR 1.130, 95% CI 1.007–1.268, p = 0.022). At discharge, 64.2% of patients were dependent. The FIB-4 index did not differ between patients who were dependent and those who were independent at the time of discharge (2.3 ± 1.5 and 2.1 ± 1.2, respectively; p = 0.061). During hospitalization, 9.8% of patients died. Patients who died during hospitalization had a higher FIB-4 index than those who were discharged (2.9 ± 1.8 and 2.3 ± 1.4, respectively; p < 0.005). Independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality were DBP (RR 1.022, 95% CI 1.010–1.034, p < 0.001), serum glucose levels (RR 1.004, 95% CI 1.001–1.007, p = 0.007), serum triglyceride levels (RR 0.993, 95% CI 0.987–0.999, p = 0.023), NIHSS (RR 1.120, 95% CI 1.092–1.149, p < 0.001), and the FIB-4 index (RR 1.169, 95% CI 1.060–1.289, p = 0.002). Conclusions: Hepatic fibrosis, evaluated with the FIB-4 index, appears to be associated with more severe ischemic stroke and might also represent an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality in patients admitted with acute ischemic stroke.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ATAlexandra Tsankof
Alexandra Tsankof
Dimitrios A. TsakirisDimitrios A. Tsakiris
Dimitrios A. Tsakiris
Lemonia SkouraLemonia Skoura
Lemonia Skoura
PTPanagiota Tsiatsiou
Panagiota Tsiatsiou
EZEleftheria Ztriva
Eleftheria Ztriva
CKChristos Kaiafa
Christos Kaiafa
Background/Objectives: Immature platelet fraction (IPF) and reticulated platelets (RPs) are biomarkers reflecting the youngest and most metabolically active platelets in circulation. RPs, a subset of immature platelets, contain residual RNA and have been associated with increased thrombotic potential. Elevated IPF levels indicate enhanced platelet production, commonly observed during elevated platelet turnover, such as in autoimmune reactions, consumption, and thrombotic events. This systematic review aims to evaluate the potential role of IPF and RPs in the context of cerebrovascular events, specifically ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, as well as transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), and to assess their clinical utility in stroke monitoring and management. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for studies published between 2000 and 2024, which focused on IPF and RPs in human subjects with cerebrovascular events. Results: Six studies met the inclusion criteria. Findings suggest that elevated levels of IPF and RP are associated with the acute and chronic phases of ischemic stroke and TIA and may reflect increased platelet turnover and thrombotic activity. Some evidence supports their role in predicting stroke severity, recurrence, and underlying etiology, although results are not yet consistent across all studies. Conclusions: IPF and RPs are emerging biomarkers with potential applications in acute ischemic stroke and risk stratification. While current evidence is promising, further research is needed to standardize measurement techniques and validate their routine use in clinical practice.