Less than 50 years since tau was first isolated from a porcine brain, its detection in femtolitre concentrations in biological fluids is revolutionizing the diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases. This review highlights the molecular and technological advances that have catapulted tau from obscurity to the forefront of biomarker diagnostics. Comprehensive updates are provided describing the burgeoning clinical applications of tau as a biomarker of neurodegeneration. For the clinician, tau not only enhances diagnostic accuracy, but holds promise as a predictor of clinical progression, phenotype, and response to drug therapy. For patients living with neurodegenerative disorders, characterization of tau dysregulation could provide much-needed clarity to a notoriously murky diagnostic landscape.

Neuroinflammation, particularly early astrocyte reactivity, is a significant driver of Alzheimer disease (AD) pathogenesis. It is unclear how the levels of astrocyte biomarkers change in patients across the AD continuum and which best reflect AD-related change. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of 3 blood astrocyte biomarkers (glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP], chitinase-3-like protein 1 [YKL-40], and S100B) in patients clinically diagnosed with AD. MEDLINE and Web of Science were searched on March 23, 2023, without restrictions on language, time, or study design, for studies reporting blood levels of the astrocyte biomarkers GFAP, YKL-40, or S100B in patients on the AD continuum (including those with mild cognitive impairment [MCI] and dementia) and a cognitively unimpaired (CU) control population. AD diagnosis was based on established diagnostic criteria and/or comprehensive multidisciplinary clinical consensus. Studies reporting indirect biomarker measures (e.g., levels of biomarker autoantibodies) were excluded. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. Pooled effect sizes were determined using the Hedge g method with a random-effects model. The review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (registration number CRD42023458305). The search identified 1,186 studies; 36 met inclusion criteria (AD continuum n = 3,366, CU n = 4,115). No study was assessed to have a high risk of bias. Compared with CU individuals, patients on the AD continuum had higher GFAP and YKL-40 levels (GFAP effect size 1.15, 95% CI 0.94-1.36, p < 0.0001; YKL-40 effect size 0.38, 95% CI 0.28-0.49, p < 0.0001). Both biomarkers were elevated in more advanced clinical stages of the disease (i.e., in AD dementia compared with MCI due to AD: GFAP effect size 0.48, 95% CI 0.19-0.76, p = 0.0009; YKL-40 effect size 0.34, 95% CI 0.10-0.57, p = 0.0048). No significant differences in blood S100B levels were identified. We demonstrated significant elevations in blood GFAP and YKL-40 levels in patients on the AD continuum compared with CU individuals. Furthermore, within the AD clinical spectrum, significant elevation correlated with more advanced disease stage. Our findings suggest that both biomarkers reflect AD-related pathology. Our findings are limited by the lack of cultural and linguistic diversity in the study populations meta-analyzed. Future meta-analyses using a biomarker-defined AD population are warranted.

S-adenosyl methionine (SAMe) is a pivotal metabolite in multiple pathways required for neuronal homeostasis, several of which are compromised in Alzheimer&