Interleukin 17 (IL-17) is an effector cytokine that plays a key role in the pathogenesis of both psoriasis and metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), a condition that is more prevalent and severe in patients with psoriasis. In liver inflammation, IL-17 is mainly produced by CD4+ T (TH17) and CD8+ T cells (Tc17), although numerous other cells (macrophages, natural killer cells, neutrophils and Tγδ cells) also contribute to the production of IL-17. In hepatocytes, IL-17 mediates systemic inflammation and the recruitment of inflammatory cells to the liver, and it is also implicated in the development of fibrosis and insulin resistance. IL-17 levels have been correlated with progression from MAFLD to steatohepatitis, cirrhosis, and even hepatocellular carcinoma. Clinical trials have shown that inhibiting IL-17A in patients with psoriasis could potentially contribute to the improvement of metabolic and liver parameters. A better understanding of the key factors involved in the pathogenesis of these chronic inflammatory processes could potentially lead to more efficient treatment for both psoriasis and MAFLD, and help to develop holistic strategies to improve the management of these patients.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a rare, chronic liver disease. Elafibranor, a dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α/δ agonist, was investigated in the phase II ELMWOOD trial (NCT05627362). This 12-week, double-blind trial enrolled adults with PSC and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≥1.5× the upper limit of normal. The primary endpoint was elafibranor safety vs. placebo. Additional endpoints included relative mean change from baseline in ALP and enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) score. A total of 68 participants (male: 54.4%; mean age: 46.3 years; inflammatory bowel disease: 55.9%) were randomized to elafibranor 80 mg (n = 22), elafibranor 120 mg (n = 23), or placebo (n = 23). At baseline, 70.6% were on ursodeoxycholic acid, 48.5% had ELF scores >9.8, and the mean ALP level was 369.5 U/L. At Week 12, rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and TEAEs leading to discontinuation in participants on elafibranor 80 mg, 120 mg, and placebo were 68.2%, 78.3%, and 69.6%, and 4.5%, 4.3%, and 8.7%, respectively. Serious TEAEs occurred only in participants on placebo (4.3%). Participants on elafibranor 80 mg and 120 mg had reductions in ALP vs. placebo (least squares mean treatment difference [95% CI]: -35.3% [-49.2, -21.4] and -54.7% [-68.3, -41.0], respectively). ALP normalization occurred only in participants on elafibranor 80 mg (9.1%) and 120 mg (17.4%). The LS mean treatment differences (95% CI) in change from baseline in ELF scores in participants on elafibranor 80 mg and 120 mg vs. placebo were -0.19 (-0.52, +0.15) and -0.28 (-0.62, +0.06), respectively. Elafibranor was well tolerated in people with PSC and associated with greater biochemical improvements over 12 weeks compared with placebo. A greater magnitude of response was observed with elafibranor 120 mg compared with 80 mg. For people with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), there is a need for a well-tolerated and effective treatment that will enhance quality of life, prevent disease progression, and improve long-term outcomes. Here, we present results from the double-blind period of the phase II ELMWOOD trial in PSC, wherein elafibranor, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α/δ agonist, demonstrated a favorable safety profile, provided greater biochemical improvements over 12 weeks compared with placebo, and appeared to stabilize markers of fibrosis and improve pruritus. These findings support larger and longer term investigations of elafibranor to explore its therapeutic potential as a treatment for people with PSC.

Summary: Background and Aims: The relationship between primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease, and its impact on treatment response and prognosis, remains underexplored.Methods: Patient cohort from two centres comprising long‐term follow‐up data. All patients had histologically confirmed PBC. Biopsies were classified according to Non‐Alcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network. Diagnosis of metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease was established when steatosis exceeded 5%, along with at least one metabolic risk factor. Patients with specific aetiologies of steatosis, other liver diseases, incomplete results and inadequate treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid were excluded. Data from patients initiating second‐line treatment were censored. Treatment response was assessed using the Toronto, Paris II and AST‐to‐platelet at 12‐month criteria. The UK PBC and Globe scores, and liver events were utilized as outcome measures.Results: The study included 129 patients, 36 showing histologically confirmed overlap between PBC and steatosis. Patients with overlap showed worse prognosis according to Paris II (61.1% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.004), Toronto (52.5% vs. 24.7%, p = 0.002), AST‐to‐platelet 12‐month >0.54 (36.1% vs. 17.2%, p = 0.021), Globe >0.30 (49.2% vs. 29.2%, p = 0.033) and UK PBC at 5, 10 and 15 years (p ≤ 0.001). Liver‐related mortality and liver transplant were more prevalent in the overlap group (p = 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, steatosis, dyslipidaemia and advanced fibrosis were independently associated to worse outcomes.Conclusions: Our findings suggest that metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease worsens the prognosis of PBC.

Summary: Background: Suboptimal response to ursodeoxycholic acid occurs in 40% of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) patients, affecting survival. Achieving a deep response (normalisation of alkaline phosphatase [ALP] and bilirubin ≤0.6 upper limit of normal) improves survival. Yet, the long‐term effectiveness of second‐line treatments remains uncertain.Aims: To evaluate the long‐term effectiveness of obeticholic acid (OCA) ± fibrates. Focusing on biochemical response (ALP ≤1.67 times the upper limit of normal, with a decrease of at least 15% from baseline and normal bilirubin levels), normalisation of ALP, deep response and biochemical remission (deep response plus aminotransferase normalisation).Methods: We conducted a longitudinal, observational, multicentre study involving ursodeoxyccholic acid non‐responsive PBC patients (Paris‐II criteria) from Spain and Portugal who received OCA ± fibrates.Results: Of 255 patients, median follow‐up was 35.1 months (IQR: 20.2–53). The biochemical response in the whole cohort was 47.2%, 61.4% and 68.6% at 12, 24 and 36 months. GLOBE‐PBC and 5‐year UK‐PBC scores improved (p < 0.001). Triple therapy (ursodeoxycholic acid plus OCA plus fibrates) had significantly higher response rates than dual therapy (p = 0.001), including ALP normalisation, deep response and biochemical remission (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, triple therapy remained independently associated with biochemical response (p = 0.024), alkaline phosphatase normalisation, deep response and biochemical remission (p < 0.001). Adverse effects occurred in 41.2% of cases, leading to 18.8% discontinuing OCA. Out of 55 patients with cirrhosis, 12 developed decompensation. All with baseline portal hypertension.Conclusion: Triple therapy was superior in achieving therapeutic goals in UDCA‐nonresponsive PBC. Decompensation was linked to pre‐existing portal hypertension.