Dimitry Schepetov

Dr. Dimitry Schepetov

Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie gori 1-12, 119234 Moscow, Russia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2016 in Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NBNataliya Budaeva
Nataliya Budaeva
Dimitry SchepetovDimitry Schepetov
Dimitry Schepetov
JZJoana Zanol
Joana Zanol
TNTatiana Neretina
Tatiana Neretina
EWEndre Willassen
Endre Willassen
Onuphid polychaetes are tubicolous marine worms commonly reported worldwide from intertidal areas to hadal depths. They often dominate in benthic communities and have economic importance in aquaculture and recreational fishing. Here we report the phylogeny of the family Onuphidae based on the combined analyses of nuclear (18S rDNA) and mitochondrial (16S rDNA) genes. Results of Bayesian and Maximum Likelihood analyses supported the monophyly of Onuphidae and its traditional subdivision into two monophyletic subfamilies: Onuphinae and Hyalinoeciinae. Ten of 22 recognized genera were monophyletic with strong node support; four more genera included in this study were either monotypic or represented by a single species. None of the genera appeared para- or polyphyletic and this indicates a strong congruence between the traditional morphology-based systematics of the family and the newly obtained molecular-based phylogenetic reconstructions. Intergeneric relationships within Hyalinoeciinae were not resolved. Two strongly supported monophyletic groups of genera were recovered within Onuphinae: ((Onuphis, Aponuphis), Diopatra, Paradiopatra) and (Hirsutonuphis, (Paxtonia, (Kinbergonuphis, Mooreonuphis))). A previously accepted hypothesis on the subdivision of Onuphinae into the Onuphis group of genera and the Diopatra group of genera was largely rejected.

24 March 2015 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Irina EkimovaIrina Ekimova
Irina Ekimova
TKTatiana Korshunova
Tatiana Korshunova
Dimitry SchepetovDimitry Schepetov
Dimitry Schepetov
TNTatiana Neretina
Tatiana Neretina
NSNadezhda Sanamyan
Nadezhda Sanamyan
Alexander MartynovAlexander Martynov
Alexander Martynov
The taxonomy of common northern nudibranch molluscs of the genus Dendronotus in the vast cold regions of Eurasia remains largely unknown. Abundant mat


15 December 2016 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KCKristen Cella
Kristen Cella
LCLeila Carmona
Leila Carmona
Irina EkimovaIrina Ekimova
Irina Ekimova
ACAnton Chichvarkhin
Anton Chichvarkhin
Dimitry SchepetovDimitry Schepetov
Dimitry Schepetov
TGTerrence M Gosliner
Terrence M Gosliner
Tergipedidae represents a diverse and successful group of aeolid nudibranchs, with approximately 200 species distributed throughout most marine ecosystems and spanning all biogeographical regions of the oceans. However, the systematics of this family remains poorly understood since no modern phylogenetic study has been undertaken to support any of the proposed classifications. The present study is the first molecular phylogeny of Tergipedidae based on partial sequences of two mitochondrial (COI and 16S) genes and one nuclear gene (H3). Maximum likelihood, maximum parsimony and Bayesian analysis were conducted in order to elucidate the systematics of this family. Our results do not recover the traditional Tergipedidae as monophyletic, since it belongs to a larger clade that includes the families Eubranchidae, Fionidae and Calmidae. This newly recovered clade is here referred to as Fionidae, the oldest name for this taxon. In addition, the present molecular phylogeny does not recover the traditional systematic relationships at a generic level, and therefore, systematic changes are required. We recognize the following clades within Fionidae: Calma, Cuthona, Cuthonella, Eubranchus, Fiona, Murmania, Tenellia, Tergipes, Tergiposacca gen. nov., Rubramoena gen. nov. and Abronica gen. nov. The type species of Tergiposacca, T. longicerata nov. sp. is described. The other two new genera have a previously described species as their type species. Most of these taxa, with the exceptions of Eubranchus, Tergipes and Fiona are composed of radically different constituent species from their traditional membership, but appear to be supported by morphological synapomorphies as well as molecular data. Aenigmastyletus, Catriona, Phestilla, Tenellia and Trinchesia are nested within other clades and, thus are here considered as synonyms of the larger clades. The phylogenetic position and validity of Myja, Guyvalvoria, Leostyletus and Subcuthona still need to be tested in future studies when material becomes available.

18 September 2012 in Molecular Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Lesya GarlitskaLesya Garlitska
Lesya Garlitska
TNTatyana Neretina
Tatyana Neretina
Dimitry SchepetovDimitry Schepetov
Dimitry Schepetov
NMNikolai Mugue
Nikolai Mugue
MTMarleen De Troch
Marleen De Troch
AAAndrey Azovsky
Andrey Azovsky

1 November 2016 in Canadian Journal of Zoology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Irina EkimovaIrina Ekimova
Irina Ekimova
ÁVÁ. Valdés
Á. Valdés
Dimitry SchepetovDimitry Schepetov
Dimitry Schepetov
ACA. Chichvarkhin
A. Chichvarkhin
Nudibranch molluscs of the genus Dendronotus Alder and Hancock, 1845 are widely distributed in the Northern Hemisphere. Taxonomic studies on the genus Dendronotus have been problematic due to high variability in the colour pattern of many species, as well as in the external morphology and anatomy. In the present paper, we studied specimens of Dendronotus from northern Pacific presumably belonging to the species Dendronotus albus MacFarland, 1966 (white frond-aeolis). Molecular and morphological data revealed the existence of two distinct species among the material examined: D. albus, which has a wide range from Kamchatka and the Kurile Islands (from where we report this species for the first time) to California in North America, and the pseudocryptic species Dendronotus diversicolor Robilliard, 1970 (multicolor frond-aeolis), which has been previously considered a junior synonym of D. albus. Dendronotus diversicolor occurs from California, USA, to British Columbia, Canada, in sympatry with D. albus. Dendronotus albus and D. diversicolor can be clearly distinguished by colour pattern, internal and external morphology, and molecular sequence data. Despite some similarities in radular and external morphology between D. albus and D. diversicolor, these two species are phylogenetically distant and belong to different clades within the genus Dendronotus, which suggests convergent evolution.