Jessica Massonnié

Dr. Jessica Massonnié


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 April 2019 in Behavior Research Methods
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAlexander L. Anwyl-Irvine
Alexander L. Anwyl-Irvine
JMJessica Massonnié
Jessica Massonnié
AFAdam Flitton
Adam Flitton
NKNatasha Kirkham
Natasha Kirkham
JEJo K. Evershed
Jo K. Evershed
Behavioral researchers are increasingly conducting their studies online, to gain access to large and diverse samples that would be difficult to get in a la

1 April 2019 in Learning and Instruction
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JMJessica Massonnié
Jessica Massonnié
MBMaryse Bianco
Maryse Bianco
LLLaurent Lima
Laurent Lima
PBPascal Bressoux
Pascal Bressoux

1 September 2020 in Environment and Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJessica Massonnié
Jessica Massonnié
PFPhilippe Frasseto
Philippe Frasseto
DMDenis Mareschal
Denis Mareschal
NKNatasha Z. Kirkham
Natasha Z. Kirkham
Classrooms are noisy, yet little is known about pupils’ subjective reactions to noise. We surveyed 112 children between 8.70 and 11.38 years of age and extracted five dimensions in their reactions to noise by factorial analyses: (1) perceived classroom loudness, (2) hearing difficulties, (3) attention capture, (4) interference, (5) annoyance from noise. Structural Equation Models were run to better understand interindividual differences in noise interference and annoyance. Children reporting hearing and switching difficulties experienced more interference and annoyance from noise. Children who had a greater propensity for mind-wandering also experienced more interference from noise, but were annoyed by noise only to the extent that it produced interference—the relationship between mind-wandering and noise annoyance was indirect, and not direct, as was the case for reported hearing and switching difficulties. We suggest that the distinction between annoyance and interference has theoretical, empirical, and practical relevance for educational research.

26 February 2019 in Frontiers in Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJessica Massonnié
Jessica Massonnié
CRCathy Jane Rogers
Cathy Jane Rogers
DMDenis Mareschal
Denis Mareschal
NKNatasha Z. Kirkham
Natasha Z. Kirkham
Creativity is considered an important skill in learning but little is known about the environmental factors affecting it in classroom settings. Extending adult findings, this study assessed whether moderate multi-talker noise promotes children’s creativity, and whether this is modulated by children’s age, working memory, and selective attention. Forty-four elementary school children between 5 and 11 years of age, divided into younger and older age groups, participated in this within-subjects’ study. The children completed two idea generation tasks; each participant performed the task both in silence and in moderate (64 dB) classroom noise. Selective attention skills, verbal and visuospatial working memory were assessed with behavioral tasks. Results showed that there were no conditions in which classroom noise promoted children’s creativity whilst some negative effects of noise were observed. Younger children (between 5 and 8 years of age) with low selective attention skills were especially at risk: they gave fewer ideas in the presence of noise, and these ideas were rated as less original. Children with good selective attention skills were globally protected against the effects of noise, performing, similarly, in silence and noise. Future studies about children’s specific creative strategies might help shed light on the mechanisms underlying these effects.

1 March 2022 in Developmental Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TNTerry Ng-Knight
Terry Ng-Knight
KGKatie A. Gilligan-Lee
Katie A. Gilligan-Lee
JMJessica Massonnié
Jessica Massonnié
HGHanna Gaspard
Hanna Gaspard
DGDebbie Gooch
Debbie Gooch
NJNicola Johnstone
Nicola Johnstone
Emerging evidence suggests interventions can improve childhood self-regulation. One intervention approach that has shown promise is Taekwondo martial arts instruction, though little is known about its acceptability among stakeholders or its mechanisms of effect. We extend evidence on Taekwondo interventions in three ways: (a) testing the efficacy of a standard introductory course of Taekwondo, (b) assessing the acceptability of Taekwondo instruction among school children, and (c) investigating two self-regulatory mechanisms by which Taekwondo may operate (executive functions and motivation). This article reports findings from a randomized control trial implementing a standard 11-week beginners' course of Taekwondo. Participants were from a mixed-sex, nonselective U.K. primary school (N = 240, age range 7 to 11 years). Measures of self-regulation included teacher-rated effortful control, impulsivity, prosocial behavior, and conduct problems; computer-based assessments of executive functions; and child self-reported expectancies and values to use self-regulation. Postintervention, children in the Taekwondo condition were rated by teachers as having fewer symptoms of conduct problems and better effortful control (specifically attentional control), and they also had better executive attention assessed by a flanker task. Effects were not found for teacher-rated inhibitory control, activation control, impulsivity, and prosocial behavior or for assessments of response inhibition, verbal working memory, and switching. Taekwondo was rated very positively by children. Finally, there was evidence that children who completed Taekwondo classes reported higher expectancies and values to use self-regulation and that expectancies and values mediated intervention effects on self-regulation. We conclude that short standard Taekwondo courses are well received by pupils, improve attentional self-regulation, and reduce symptoms of conduct problems. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

16 March 2022 in Oxford Review of Education
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JMJessica Massonnié
Jessica Massonnié
ALAnna Llaurado
Anna Llaurado
ESEmma Sumner
Emma Sumner
JDJulie E. Dockrell
Julie E. Dockrell
There has been a resurgence in concern about the levels of pupils’ oral language skills at school entry. To support and develop these skills effectively an understanding of the key components of oral language is required. We examined the oral language skills of monolingual children in Reception (MAge = 57.9 months; n = 126) and Year 1 (MAge = 69.07; n = 124) classes in England. Children were recruited from schools that were representative of London primary schools and were assessed on measures designed to tap phonology, core language skills (vocabulary and grammar) and discourse skills, both in the receptive and expressive modalities. Using confirmatory factor analyses, we examined the associations between oral language skills by component and modality for each age group. Oral language was best represented by four dimensions in Reception (receptive core language skills, receptive discourse, expressive core language skills, and expressive discourse). By contrast in Year 1, three dimensions were identified, irrespective of modality: phonology, core language skills and discourse. Our data speak to the importance of capturing these dimensions in assessments and teaching and monitoring their development at school entry. The results also highlighted the foundational role of discourse skills at the start of school. Graphical Abstract