Makoto Kobayashi

Prof. Makoto Kobayashi

Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8575, Japan
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

38Years (1989-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2005 in Antioxidants & Redox Signaling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MKMakoto Kobayashi
Makoto Kobayashi
MYMasayuki Yamamoto
Masayuki Yamamoto
Several years have passed since NF-E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) was demonstrated to regulate the induction of genes encoding antioxidant proteins and phase 2 detoxifying enzymes. Following a number of studies, it was realized that Nrf2 is a key factor for cytoprotection in various aspects, such as anticarcinogenicity, neuroprotection, antiinflammatory response, and so forth. These widespread functions of Nrf2 spring from the coordinated actions of various categories of target genes. The activation mechanism of Nrf2 has been studied extensively. Under normal conditions, Nrf2 localizes in the cytoplasm where it interacts with the actin binding protein, Kelch-like ECH associating protein 1 (Keap1), and is rapidly degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Signals from reactive oxygen species or electrophilic insults target the Nrf2-Keap1 complex, dissociating Nrf2 from Keap1. Stabilized Nrf2 then translocates to the nuclei and transactivates its target genes. Interestingly, Keap1 is now assumed to be a substrate-specific adaptor of Cul3-based E3 ubiquitin ligase. Direct participation of Keap1 in the ubiquitination and degradation of Nrf2 is plausible. The Nrf2-Keap1 system is present not only in mammals, but in fish, suggesting that its roles in cellular defense are conserved throughout evolution among vertebrates. This review article recounts recent knowledge of the Nrf2-Keap1 system, focusing especially on the molecular mechanism of Nrf2 regulation. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 7, 385–394.

1 July 2004 in Developmental Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KKKoichi Kawakami
Koichi Kawakami
HTHisashi Takeda
Hisashi Takeda
NKNoriko Kawakami
Noriko Kawakami
MKMakoto Kobayashi
Makoto Kobayashi
NMNaoto Matsuda
Naoto Matsuda
MMMasayoshi Mishina
Masayoshi Mishina

1 January 2006 in Advances in Enzyme Regulation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MKMakoto Kobayashi
Makoto Kobayashi
MYMasayuki Yamamoto
Masayuki Yamamoto

1 January 2009 in Molecular and Cellular Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMakoto Kobayashi
Makoto Kobayashi
LLLi Li
Li Li
NINoriko Iwamoto
Noriko Iwamoto
YNYaeko Nakajima-Takagi
Yaeko Nakajima-Takagi
HKHiroshi Kaneko
Hiroshi Kaneko
MYMasayuki Yamamoto
Masayuki Yamamoto
Animals have evolved defense systems for surviving in a chemically diverse environment. Such systems should demonstrate plasticity, such as adaptive immunity, enabling a response to even unknown chemicals. The antioxidant transcription factor Nrf2 is activated in response to various electrophiles and induces cytoprotective enzymes that detoxify them. We report here the discovery of a multiple sensing mechanism for Nrf2 activation using zebrafish and 11 Nrf2-activating compounds. First, we showed that six of the compounds tested specifically target Cys-151 in Keap1, the ubiquitin ligase for Nrf2, while two compounds target Cys-273. Second, in addition to Nrf2 and Keap1, a third factor was deemed necessary for responding to three of the compounds. Finally, we isolated a zebrafish mutant defective in its response to seven compounds but not in response to the remaining four. These results led us to categorize Nrf2 activators into six classes and hypothesize that multiple sensing allows enhanced plasticity in the system.

7 August 2002 in Genes to Cells
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMakoto Kobayashi
Makoto Kobayashi
KIKen Itoh
Ken Itoh
TSTakafumi Suzuki
Takafumi Suzuki
HOHitoshi Osanai
Hitoshi Osanai
KNKeizo Nishikawa
Keizo Nishikawa
MYMasayuki Yamamoto
Masayuki Yamamoto
Background: The transcription factor Nrf2 and its negative regulator Keap1 play important roles in transcriptional induction of a set of detoxifying and anti‐oxidant enzymes. To gain an insight into our present enigma as to how cells receive oxidative and electrophilic signals and transduce them to Nrf2, we have developed a zebrafish model system for molecular toxicological studies.Results: We systematically cloned zebrafish cytoprotective enzyme cDNAs and found their expression to be efficiently induced by electrophilic agents. We consequently identified the presence of Nrf2 and Keap1 in zebrafish. Both loss‐ and gain‐of‐function analyses demonstrated that Nrf2 is the primary regulator of a subset of cytoprotective enzyme genes, while Keap1 suppresses Nrf2 activity in zebrafish. An ETGE motif, critical for the Nrf2–Keap1 interaction, was identified in the Neh2 domain of Nrf2 by reverse two‐hybrid screening and found to be indispensable for the regulation of Nrf2 activity in zebrafish.Conclusion: Taken together, these results indicate that the Nrf2‐Keap1 system is highly conserved among vertebrates and that the interface between Nrf2 and Keap1 forms an important molecular basis of this regulatory system.

1 January 2002 in Development
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DKDaisuke Kobayashi
Daisuke Kobayashi
MKMakoto Kobayashi
Makoto Kobayashi
KMKen Matsumoto
Ken Matsumoto
TOToshihiko Ogura
Toshihiko Ogura
MNMasato Nakafuku
Masato Nakafuku
KSKenji Shimamura
Kenji Shimamura
Regionalization of the embryonic brain is achieved through multi-step processes that operate sequentially and/or simultaneously. Localized sources of various signaling molecules act as organizing centers that pattern neighboring fields to create molecularly distinct domains. We investigated the mechanisms underlying the regionally distinct competence for two such organizing signals, Fibroblast growth factor 8 (Fgf8) and Sonic hedgehog (Shh), using chick embryos. First, we demonstrated that FGF receptor 1 (Fgfr1) and Fgfr3, expressed differentially in the developing brain, possess an equivalent potential to induce the regionally distinct Fgf8-responsive genes, depending on the anterior-posterior dimension of the brain. Next we found that homeodomain transcription factors Six3 and Irx3 can alter the regional responses to both Fgf8 and Shh in the forebrain. Six3 confers the ability to express Bf1, a gene essential for the telencephalon and eye development, and Nkx2.1, which is required for development of the hypothalamus. In contrast, Irx3 confers the ability to express En2 and Nkx6.1 in response to Fgf8 and Shh, respectively. Furthermore, an alteration in the region-specific response to Fgf8 upon misexpression of Irx3 resulted in transformation of diencephalic and possibly telencephalic tissues into the optic tectum. Finally, we demonstrated that Six3 and Irx3 can mutually repress their expression, which may contribute to the establishment of their complementary expression domains in the neural plate. These repressive interactions are specific, as Six3 did not repress Gbx2, and Irx3 did not disturb Otx2 expression. These findings provide evidence that the early embryonic forebrain is demarcated into two domains with distinct genetic programs, which argues against the authentic telen-diencephalic subdivision.